radical artifice
Beyond Radical Artifice
Marjorie Perloff's study of twentieth century
poetics, Radical Artifice: Writing Poetry
in the Age of Media, studies a few
electronic texts and many printed texts as it presents an understanding
of the "interplay" between literature and media. Building a historical
perspective, as possibilities in most forms of media continue to develop
(especially networks and software), continuous investigations and understandings
of poetic artifice are necessary.
------------
...the electronic pulse of active charges flowing across
a continually shifting differential.
Visual allure, animation and other forms of multiplex
engagement alter the variables in literature's complexity in the current
creative moment. Examining various aspects of "cybertext" as outlined
by Espen Aarseth
in his critical study Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature,
then applying them as a lens on Johanna Drucker's The
History of the/my Wor(l)d, our presentation wishes to suggest further
areas of investigation with regards to aesthetics and purposes for machine
modulated text as cultural and poetic activity. Particularly under
inspection in this research are transformations enabled by the digitization
of documents already diverging from-the-norm, which allow and/or require
each reader to discover from a fresh perspective their meaning.
Drucker's
work (here and elsewhere) obviously questions and diverges from any
standardized notion of popular textuality; as Pamela
suggested in her paper, the reader of her work has to find a way to combine
disparate parts of the text. In Cybertext, Aarseth defines
such textual presentations, where the user effectuates a semiotic sequence,
where "nontrivial effort is required to allow the reader to traverse the
text," as ergodic literature (1). Readers and writers share the responsibility
of being conduits and mediators between world, image, thought, and language
in a (sometimes) mysterious intertextual environment.
Cybertext, in Aarseth's design, is not confined
to electronic texts. Focusing predominantly on the mechanical organization
of the text, Aarseth instead regards the intricacies of the medium as an
integral part of the text. The major defining point is that "a cybertext
must contain some kind of information feedback loop." This holds
true for any textual situation where "'text' is something more than just
marks upon a surface" (19). This perspective on all forms of textuality
expands the scope of literary studies. Michael
Joyce, a serious hypertext author and pedagogue, makes the claim that
hypertext no longer presents for users (and authors) a situation which
is "either/or" but rather "and/and/and". Yet, as Aarseth observes,
Joyce outlines just two broad lenses through which to examine and classify
hypertext and hypermedia: as either "constructive" or "explorative."
Joyce's critical vocabulary regarding hypertexts is too broad. Aarseth's
textology is not only descriptive; its particulars create a solid platform
upon which to illustrate and introduce aesthetic points. He attempts
to achieve a terminology that "has distinctive power as well as unproblematic
connotations" (59).
Cybertext, writes Aaresth, "is the wide-range
(or perspective) of possible textualities seen as a typology of machines,
as various kinds of literary communication systems where the functional
differences among the mechanical parts play a defining role in determining
the aesthetic process" (22). In his typology, terms such as scriptons,
textons, and traversal function are introduced in order to
determine different variables in any text. Specific variables outlined
by Aarseth are: Dynamics; Determinability; Transiency; Perspective;
Access; Linking; and User Functions. By analyzing such intricacies
within any text may we begin to develop a "cross-genral" vocabulary, an
apparatus by which to discuss textuality in a "(post) textual" world?
Putting these arbitrary dynamics into the mix, alternate attentions will
arise. In any event, "Until these practices are identified and examined,"
writes Aarseth, "a significant part of the question of interpretation must
go unanswered" (20).
The jacket cover of Johanna
Drucker's The
History of the/my Wor(l)d proclaims the book "provides a striking
alternative to the familiar telling of historical events," and combines
"the intersection of official history and individual memory". As
we describe, and as you see, The History of the/my Wor(l)d--originally
produced by hand on a letter-press--presents varied fonts, font sizing,
a mixture of symbols/icons (such as stars, triangles, telephones, airplanes),
images ("pods, ciphers, and other mysterious devices"), and alphanumeric
text. Stand-alone
lines are juxtaposed with blocks of text offer the reader various ways
to perceive it. This piece, to adopt another of Aarseth's concepts,
is multicursal: the reader faces a series of critical choices, as
they do in all ergodic literature. These particular symbols and found
images are pictographic referencing via elements of electronic and print
culture. History begins its literal or non-literal path with
its gist up front, even if it is dwarfed or obscured by visual effects
(especially the oversize article ("the"), and personal pronoun ("my")).
Directly stated, next to the image of a diagram used when mapping circuits,
the book contains "Fragments of a tesimonial to history, some lived and
realized moments open to claims of memory".
Drucker's process exhibits archetypical multiplex
possibilties, such as how "layering" functions to create the style of feedback
mechanism introduced by Aarseth. Reading her work, every formal projection
is important yet the importance of language is obvious. In Drucker's
history is "the word adored" (3). While each aspect is equally vital
to her poetics, in this piece we see word as word, its truth is taught
and transmittable, flexible, creative, and sometimes direct; it is a mythos
of law, word, muse made authority. Sometimes word becomes icon, as
iconbecomes word. Hopefully some of you were all able to piece out
this exquisite line across the first three pages of her story: "Soft,
fat, slow time takes its first breath following the initial explosion,
making light into a face swaddled in warmth and letters. Our earth
took us to heart and mind in the intellectual embrace of a cool companionship"
(2-4).
Reading History as a book, as cybertext
(in Aarsethian terms), its dynamics are static. It is a determinate
and intransient text. Its perspective is impersonal. Since
all aspects of the text are available to readers at all times it is a random
access text with no mechanical links. Its user functions are explorative
and interpretive. While Drucker states in her 1997
interview with Matthew Kirschenbaum that "electronic forms will and
already are allowing the popular imagination to reinvent its relation to
the received traditions of reading, writing and imagining," she nonetheless
declares, "I am so attached to print documents and objects that I can't
say whether I will ever manage to create a hypertext novel/work."
If yet another textual dimension is concievable, however, the Granary Books
edition of The History begins to make an example of how the mechanical
parts may be suddenly blurred by technological possibility.
In an endnote, Drucker states that the Granary
version is already an electronic adaptation, "Quarked on a Mac based on
original layout." Taking the further step of transforming just one--or
perhaps two--of the previously determined variables in an electronic version
of this book could completely expand the capabilities of the document.
For instance, let's consider a mode of hyper-feedback where an outwardly
linked reconstruction or version of the text is ventured. A transformation,
a translation of this cybertext into a linked cybertext (potentially with
textonic functions where users could not only make links but permanently
add their own text and links), furthers the radical artifice and potency
(poet instensity) that emerges from the layering of verbal and visual information.
On a large-scale, sophisticated network (i.e.
greater than the Internet), Drucker could not only express her vision in
this matter but "program" The History of the/my Wor(l)d by plugging
into a much larger body of textual materials. Language and image
become common denominators allowing pluralistic and subjective interpretation,
engaged self-directed exploration through (not-yet-available) vast archives
of history and other forms of cultural interpretation. As Kirschenbaum
points out, "...the use of different fonts and point sizes in conjunction
with visual layout cues which gesture toward an array of multiple reading
paths all simultaneously displayed on the open page." Drucker uses
these to help her in achieving alternatives to linear and sequential reading
patterns.
A hardwired non-linear History could lead
to databanks of self- or global histories. The application of this
poetics opens direct, random, and numerous other anthological possibilities
for texts. In the pages you are seeing alone, direct links could
be made through language, image, via intuitive and non-intuitive linking,
either (or both) on the part of the producer(s), users, or other forms
of agents. At least the following disciplines or areas are cognitively
accessed in these pages: global history (could include series of
definitions, dictionaries, encyclopedias), spiritual/religious history,
architecture, philosophy, athletics, world cultures, anthropology, biology,
mathematics, women's issues, history of technology, geology, geography,
"popular" culture, environment, industrial society, sociology, human and
material transportation. Opposites and relatives to each of these
would exist in an openly matrixed version. Diacritical marks could
be random or non-randomly generated links. Every icon and image could
be uniquely designed and programmed; every index could be textonic.
This user-guided endeavor may or may not be a virtually created model or
space. Both benefits and drawbacks would arise by creating instructionless
projections like Laurie
Anderson's Puppet Motel which tend to either frustrate users
or completely captivate them, absorbing--however temporarily--their attention
and interest. Some users will want to be led, others will want to
find their own way through history. Of course, this type of design--where
literature is literal investigation, and curiosity guides the user's way--entails
great organization and precision on the part of the producers. Visual
hypertextuality, as Michael Joyce writes, creates an "interaction between
viewers of its material and those who created or gathered that material"
(20). The purpose behind my ideas as here described is to have a
series of textual events. Information as drawing, graphic designs,
and as binary data, can be located more quickly than it can in books.
A user can either follow closely along with a literalist approach, or flip
quickly through. Utilizing visual and digital cues is a way of programming
our minds.
The body of the fine arts has suffered an infusion
of new processes and data
manipulations so that it now lives the same cyborg
hybrid life as every other entity.
-Drucker, "Critical Pleasure"
A poem or book can not be more than what they are, and at the
same time aspire to be farther-reaching than history has previously allowed.
Readers guide themselves to cognitive and creatives space of their own
choosing, using interactive principles and practices. What do these
technologies tell us about the principles and evolution of human communication?
In an essay on the art of Joseph Nechvatal, Drucker celebrates Nechvatal's
"network of visual pleasure whose critical insight resonates with a satisfying
complexity, providing a surface whose body indexes the corpus of the social,
proposing mutation as a process of reinvention and renewal." It is
not an issue of books versus computer networks but rather the limits to
the extent to which we involve ourselves with language, image, linking,
thinking, organization and patience.
--Chris Funkhouser
back to top
Works Cited
Aarseth, Espen. Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic
Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
U. Press, 1997.
Drucker,
Johanna. The History of the/my Wor(l)d. New York:
Granary Books, 1992.
- - - . "Critical Pleasure." Online.
http://www.dom.de/arts/artists/jnech/drucker.html
15 April 98
Joyce, Michael. Of Two Minds. Ann Arbor:
U. of Michigan Press, 1995.
Kirschenbaum, Matthew. "Through Light and the Alphabet":
An Interview with Johanna
Drucker. Postmodern Culture. Online.
http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/pmc/text-only/
issue.597/ kirschenbaum.597 7 April 98
Perloff, Marjorie. Radical Artifice: Writing Poetry
in the Age of Media.
<note>
"Scriptons" is a term used to describe strings of text as they appear
to a reader. "Textons" is used to describe strings as they exist
in the text. "Traversal function" is the mechanism by which scriptons
are revealed or generated from textons and presented to the user of the
text (62-65).