Summary of Jul7,2001 results
4 on 4: ginf 0.328                       0.47
        g    2                            4.64
        L    900  330/330/900/381/522    420/441/1700/1000/1400
        h    512
        40.180.25 : 25.200.35,40.200.25

4 on 2:ginf 0.45                         0.47
       g    1.8-2                         4.3
       L    980  300/300/980/400/540     360/360/1620/950/1200
       h    512
       40.180,25:40.200.25, 25.200.25

8 on 8: ginf 0.40       0.67
        g   3           11
        L   1500 460/460/1520/490/600   1000/1000/4400/2400/3400
        h   512 
        40.180.25: 25.180.25 25.200.25

8 on 4: gin 0.63      0.81
        g   3.5       10
        L  1700 500/470/1700-1900/300-500/900-1100 700/700/4200/2200/3100
        h  500 
       40.180.25:40.180.50 40.200.50

16 on 16: gin 0.72   1.4
          g 5.7      27
          L 2700   650/670/2700/680/1500  1550/1580/10000/5400/8500
          h 512
       40.200.30: 200.300.30 120.200.30 

16 on 8: gin 0.82-0.92        1.4
         g 8.6                43
         L 4000 740/700/4000/770/1600  1100/1300/9000/4300/4900
         h 512
-----
New file created Jul 7,2001


4 procs on 4 procs

1 : 4.40.180.25 second (g)
2 : 4.25.200.35 first  (L)
3 : 4.40.200.25
L  E/C/F/P/S in useconds
   2-3-1 : 331/318/872/363/555    420/441/1730/1080/1430
           331/361/900/586/527
           331/325/889/381/522 

      g     h
g :   0.324 16384     0.47
      0.382 8192      0.57
      0.49  4096      0.79
      0.732 2048      1.35
      1.234 1024      2.40
      2.0    512      4.64
Choose L=931 g=2  h_0 = 512
       L=860 g=2  h_0 = 512

Conclusion ginfty = 0.328
           L      = 900 usecs
           g      = 2            
           4.40.180.25 second 

-----------------
4 on 2 procs
1: 40.180.35
2: 40.200.25
3: 25.200.25

L  300/300/980/400/540    360/360/1620/950/1200


 2.19 512  4.30
 1.28      2.22
 0.86      1.25
 0.61      0.73
 0.50      0.53
 0.45 16384 0.47

test 1 better ass g and l
Conclusion ginfty = 0.45
           L      = 980 usecs
           g      = 2.2            
           40.180.35

-------------------
8 on 8 procs
1: 8.25.180.25j
2: 8.25.200.25
3: 8.40.180.25

L 460/460-500/1520/490/600     1030/1030/4455/2460/3400

 3.3  512  11.0
 1.8        5.9
 0.98       3.1
 0.66       1.7
 0.49       1.00
 0.39 16384 0.67
 0.49
   
Test 3 gives better results


Conclusion ginfy = 0.40
           g = 3
           L = 1500
           40.180.25

-----------------------------------------------------
8 on 4 procs
1: 40.180.50
2: 40.200.50
3: 40.1800.25

L 500/470/1700(3)-1900/300-525/900-1110  700/700/4200/2200/3100kj
  
 test1,2 give better Scomm te
 test 3 better Fcomm

3.9 512 10.8
2.2      5.9
1.26     3.12
0.92   1.99
.73 8192  1.12
0.63 16384  0.94

COnclusion
  L      = 1700
  ginfty = 0.63
  g      = 3.5
  h      = 500

----------------------------------------
16 procs on 16
1: 120.200.30
2: 200.300.30
3: 40.200.30

L 433/300/2500/500/1100o   1550/1580/10000/5400/8500-12000
  ^^^ 1run
  650/670/2700/680/1500

 g test 3 is better
5.7       27
3.0       14
1.7       7.5
1.8       3.9
1.1 8192  2.17
0.72      1.4
0.98      2.0


COnclu ginf = 0.72
       g    = 5.7
       L    = 2700
       h    = 512

----------------
16 on 8 procs
1: 100.200.30
2: 300.200.30
3: 300.200.40


  500/450/3700/464/1100 (1 run)
bet Fcomm is 3 better scomm is 1 better other is 1
better g  1/2
  740 / 70/4000/770/1600      1100/1300/8999-15000/4300-7200/4999-11000
bet Fcom 2 bett scomm 3/2 bett other 1/3/2
better g 1/2

2 better than 1
8.6     43
4.3     24
2.2     12
1.4     6
0.95    3.6
0.82    2.11
1.0    1.5

USe 2
   ginfy = 0.82-0.92
   g = 8.6 (better is 8)
   L = 4000
   h = 512



----------

----------


File below is old and apparently obsolete.
CLuster of PCs connected with a high performance switch 
(eg CISCO WS 2924M-XL-EN, of WS 2908-XL)
Ls in microseconds as reported by Test3
 g in microseconds/int(32-bit word)
 First 3 parameters are the set variables in Makefile LFLAGS

4 procs on 2 machines
               L    g
40/200/25/2k  1600 0.523
25/200/25/1k  1600 0.519
40/180/35/1k  1600 0.523


4 procs on 4 machines

40/200/25/4k 0.382 1175
25/200/35/1k 0.378 1194
40/180/25/1k 0.382 1159


8 procs on 4 machines
40/200/50 1k  3400 0.639
40/180/25?
40/180/50/1k 3400 0.645


8 procs on 8 machines
40/180/25 1k or 4k 2100 0.427
40/200/25
25/200/25 2200 0.418
25/180/25 1k 2200 0.42
25/180/30

16 procs on 8 machines
Low L 300/300/50 1k 7100 1.02
Low g 400/500/120 1k 7400 0.80

(50 below/3rd arg give better g 3-5% but worse L 5kinsteadof 4k)
40  200 30
100 200 30
300 200 30 
400 200 30
