Annotated Bibliography [Topic:
"The English Strategy at Agincourt"]
Burke, James. "The Battle of Agincourt, 1415 A.D." 29 May 1996.
(http://user.aol.com/plaszo/burke/done/artagin.htm).
popular educational television series, analyzes the power of the
Welsh longbow, the weapon that determined the outcome of the fighting
at Agincourt. Burke says that the longbow had a range of 400 yards
and, at closer range, could penetrate armor. The longbow, he says,
was the weapon that "turned the
medieval social order upside down."
on three of the most intense battles in European military history:
Agincourt, Waterloo, and the Somme. In his chapter on Agincourt,
Keegan emphasizes the logistical problems of the French cavalry when
faced by a much more maneuverable army of English archers and lightly
armored infantry.
International Press, 1996, III, 84-88.
According to this entry, the Battle at Agincourt produced one of the
most one-sided outcomes in military history. Despite the numerical
superiority of the French, the English strategy of luring the French
cavalry onto a muddy field and their tactical use of the longbow
illustrates the value of strategy
in medieval warfare.
This account of the long conflict between England and France provides
a French perspective on the political issues which lay behind the
conflict. Perroy stresses the lack of strong leadership at court and
the resulting dissension among the French nobility for their military
setbacks. He devotes only one paragraph to Agincourt and argues that
the English campaign there had
no long-term significance.
(1997): 104-10.
This article analyzes the image of the king as epic hero in two
film versions of Shakespeare’s Henry V. The author concentrates on
the visual effects of the Agincourt sequences to show a historical
figure evolving through a dramatic
hero into a film icon.
This biography of Henry V includes a chapter, "That Dreadful Day of
Agincourt," which describes Henry’s strategy both in building
his small army’s morale and in enticing the French horsemen to charge
into a killing field upon which the English archers could fire on
them from relatively safe positions. The outcome of the battle was
so overwhelming and so unexpected that the victors became convinced
that they had divine assistance and that Henry’s claim to the throne
of France was valid.