This is one of the webpages of Libarid A. Maljian at the Department of Physics at CSLA at NJIT.
New Jersey Institute of Technology
College of Science and Liberal Arts
Department of Physics
The Earth in Space
Spring 2023
Second Examination lecture notes
Mineralogy
Mineralogy is the study of
minerals, and a mineralogist is someone who studies minerals. A mineral is defined as a naturally occurring
solid inorganic object with a definite chemical structure. As we will discuss shortly, a rock does not
have a definite chemical structure. This
is the most important difference between a mineral and a rock; whereas a
mineral has a definite chemical structure, a rock does not have a definite
chemical structure. Every mineral has at
least two names: a mineral name and a chemical name. For example, the mineral thenardite
has the chemical name sodium sulfate Na2SO4. As another example, the mineral magnesite has
the chemical name magnesium carbonate MgCO3. Some minerals have a third name, its common
designation. For example, the mineral
halite has the chemical name sodium chloride NaCl and
the common designation table salt. As
another example, the mineral hematite has the chemical name ferric oxide Fe2O3 and the common designation
rust.
There are various properties
of minerals that enable us to uniquely identify a mineral. For example, the color of a mineral may help
us to identify a mineral. However, the
color of a mineral is the least reliable way to identify a mineral, since there
can be some variations in color of even a specific mineral. The streak of a mineral is its color in its
powdered form, which more reliably identifies a mineral than its color in its
solid form. The luster of a mineral is
how the mineral reflects light. For
example, minerals that reflect light very well have a metallic luster, since
most metals reflect light very well. A
dull luster is no luster, meaning the mineral does not reflect light well at
all. Yet another property of minerals is
how the mineral is able to transmit light through it. Some minerals are more transparent, meaning
they easily transmit light through them.
Some minerals are more opaque, meaning that light is not transmitted
through them. In between these two
extremes are translucent minerals, which permit light to be transmitted through
them but not particularly well.
The hardness of a mineral is
its resistance to scratching or rubbing.
We can test the hardness of two minerals by rubbing or scratching them
against each other. If one mineral is
able to scratch a second mineral, then the first mineral is more hard than the
second mineral. If instead the second
mineral is able to scratch the first mineral, then the second mineral is more
hard than the first mineral. The hardness
of minerals is quantified with the Mohs scale, named for the German
mineralogist Friedrich Mohs who defined this scale in the year 1812. The Mohs scale is numbered from one through
ten. Lower numbers on the Mohs scale are
less hard minerals, while higher numbers on the Mohs scale are more hard
minerals. The least hard mineral on the
Mohs scale is talc, which can easily be crumbled into talcum powder, more
commonly known as baby powder. The most
hard mineral on the Mohs scale is diamond, which is one of the mineral forms of
carbon. Since diamond is the most hard
mineral on the Mohs scale, no mineral can scratch a diamond except another
diamond.
The tenacity of a mineral is
its resistance to breaking or deforming.
We must break or at least deform a mineral to test its tenacity. There is no tenacity scale analogous to the
Mohs scale for hardness. Instead, we
describe the tenacity of minerals with various terms, such as brittle if the
mineral is easily breakable or malleable if the mineral is easily deformable.
The cleavage of a mineral is
its crystal geometry when broken. This
means that we must break a mineral to test its cleavage. Some examples of cleavage include cubic
cleavage if the mineral breaks into right angles, diagonal cleavage if the
mineral breaks into slanted angles, and lateral cleavage if the mineral breaks
into thin sheets. The habit of a mineral
is its crystal geometry if it happens to form without confinement. Some examples of habit include equant habit
if the mineral forms with equal angles, bladed habit if the mineral forms into
rods, and fibrous habit if the mineral forms with long threads. Most minerals form with some amount of
confinement; therefore, the habit of a mineral usually does not manifest
itself.
The density of anything in
the universe is the ratio of its mass to its volume. We can measure the density of a solid by
immersing it in a liquid. If the object
is more dense than the liquid, then the solid will sink until it lands at the
bottom of the container. If the object
is less dense than the liquid, then the solid will rise until it floats on the
surface of the liquid. We almost always
measure the density of a mineral by immersing it in liquid water. The density of a mineral as compared with the
density of liquid water is called the specific gravity of the mineral. For example, if a mineral has a specific
gravity of two, this means that its density is twice the density of liquid
water; such a mineral would sink in liquid water. As another example, if the specific gravity a
mineral is one-half, this means that its density is half the density of liquid
water; such a mineral would float in liquid water.
There are many other
properties of minerals, such as the taste of a mineral or the smell of a
mineral. Some minerals have magnetic
properties, which can be tested using an ordinary bar magnet such as a
refrigerator magnet. Some minerals are
highly chemically reactive. By using all
of these properties of minerals, we can uniquely identify minerals. This enables us to classify minerals based on
their chemical composition.
There are many classes of
minerals, but by far the most abundant group of minerals are the silicate
minerals, which are based on the silicon-oxygen tetrahedral group SiO44–. The carbon
atom usually forms covalent bonds with four other atoms with a tetrahedral
geometry. The silicon atom also usually
forms covalent bonds with four other atoms with a tetrahedral geometry. Therefore, we can build an almost infinite
diversity of molecules based on either the carbon atom or the silicon
atom. Molecules based on the carbon atom
are called organic molecules, an enormous category of molecules that is the
basis of all life on planet Earth. For
example, carbohydrates (including simple sugars and complex carbohydrates),
lipids (fats), proteins, and nucleic acids (such as deoxyribonucleic acid DNA
and ribonucleic acid RNA) are all organic molecules. Just as organic molecules form an enormous
category of molecules, silicate minerals form an enormous category of
minerals. More than ninety percent of
all minerals are silicate minerals.
Although the carbon-carbon
covalent bond is strong enough to build organic molecules, the silicon-silicon
covalent bond is not strong enough to build silicate minerals. However, the silicon-oxygen covalent bond is
strong enough to build silicate minerals.
Therefore, there is always an oxygen atom between any two silicon atoms
in a silicate mineral. Other atoms also
bond with the silicon atoms within silicate minerals, often metals such as iron
and magnesium. This is also analogous to
organic molecules, where other atoms such as hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen
bond with the carbon atoms within organic molecules.
All life on planet Earth has
evolved based on organic molecules because of the nearly infinite diversity of
molecules based on the carbon atom. It
is theoretically possible that life could evolve on another planet based on
silicate minerals, which themselves compose rocks, as we will discuss
shortly. There is a nearly infinite
diversity of silicate minerals, just as there is a nearly infinite diversity of
organic molecules. The tetrahedral
geometry of silicate minerals and organic molecules is also the same. On a hypothetical planet where life evolved
based on silicate minerals, all life would be composed of rocks, which would
themselves be composed of silicate minerals, just as all life on planet Earth
is composed of organic molecules.
Imagine a planet with rock people, rock dogs, rock cats, and rock
trees. This would be a planet where all
life evolved based on silicate minerals instead of organic molecules.
The simplest organic molecule
would be a single carbon atom covalently bonded to other atoms. These are the methanes. We may chemically bond two methanes to each other, resulting in two carbon atoms
covalently bonded to each other and to other atoms. These are the ethanes,
which are essentially double methanes. We may chemically bond another methane to an
ethane (a double methane), resulting in three carbon atoms covalently bonded to
one another and to other atoms. These
are the propanes, which are essentially triple methanes. We may
continue this process until we have constructed long chains of carbon atoms
covalently bonded to one another and to other atoms. These are one-dimensional, single-chain
organic molecules. We may chemically
bond two single-chain organic molecules to each other, resulting in a
double-chain organic molecule. We may
chemically bond another single-chain organic molecule to a double-chain organic
molecule, resulting in a triple-chain organic molecule. We may continue this process until we have
constructed a two-dimensional, single-sheet organic molecule. We may chemically bond two single-sheet
organic molecules to each other, resulting in a double-sheet organic
molecule. We may chemically bond another
single-sheet organic molecule to a double-sheet organic molecule, resulting in
a triple-sheet organic molecule. We may
continue this process until we have constructed three-dimensional organic
molecules. Remarkably, our discussion of
inorganic silicate minerals will be completely analogous to our discussion of
organic molecules. This further persuades
us that life could evolve on a hypothetical planet based on inorganic silicate
minerals instead of organic molecules.
The simplest silicate mineral
would be a single silicon atom covalently bonded to other atoms. These are the nesosilicates, such as the olivines and the garnets.
We may chemically bond two nesosilicates to each other, resulting in two
silicon atoms covalently bonded to each other (with an oxygen atom between them
of course) as well as to other atoms.
These are the sorosilicates, such as the
epidotes. The sorosilicates
are essentially double nesosilicates. We
may chemically bond another nesosilicate to a sorosilicate
(a double nesosilicate), resulting in three silicon atoms covalently bonded to
one another (with oxygen atoms between them of course) as well as to other
atoms. These are triple nesosilicates. We may continue this process until we have
constructed long chains of silicon atoms covalently bonded to one another (with
oxygen atoms between them of course) as well as to other atoms. These are one-dimensional, single-chain
inosilicates, such as the pyroxenes. We
may chemically bond two single-chain inosilicates to each other, resulting in a
double-chain inosilicate, such as the amphiboles. We may chemically bond another single-chain
inosilicate to a double-chain inosilicate, resulting in a triple-chain inosilicate. We may continue this process until we have
constructed two-dimensional, single-sheet phyllosilicates, such as the
serpentines and the micas. We may
chemically bond two single-sheet phyllosilicates to each other, resulting in a
double-sheet phyllosilicate. We may
chemically bond another single-sheet phyllosilicate to a double-sheet
phyllosilicate, resulting in a triple-sheet phyllosilicate. We may continue this process until we have
constructed three-dimensional tectosilicates, such as the zeolites, the
feldspars, and quartz.
The nesosilicates have
highest oxygen-to-silicon ratios as well as the most amount of metals, such as
iron and magnesium, chemically bonded with the silicon atoms. This is because a single silicon atom is free
to bond with four other atoms simultaneously.
However, as we progress from nesosilicates to sorosilicates
(double nesosilicates) to triple nesosilicates to single-chain inosilicates,
the oxygen-to-silicon ratios become smaller and smaller and there are fewer and
fewer metals, such as iron and magnesium, chemically bonded with the silicon
atoms. This is because more and more
bonding sites of the silicon atoms are occupied by silicon-oxygen covalent
bonds that hold the entire molecular structure of the mineral together, leaving
fewer and fewer sites where metals may bond with the silicon atoms. This progression continues from single-chain
inosilicates to double-chain inosilicates to triple-chain inosilicates to
single-sheet phyllosilicates. As more
and more bonding sites of the silicon atoms are occupied by silicon-oxygen
covalent bonds that hold the entire molecular structure of the mineral
together, there are fewer and fewer sites where metals may bond with the
silicon atoms. This progression
continues from single-sheet phyllosilicates to double-sheet phyllosilicates to
triple-sheet phyllosilicates and ultimately to tectosilicates, which have the
lowest oxygen-to-silicon ratios and the least amount of metals, such as iron
and magnesium, chemically bonded with the silicon atoms. In particular, the tectosilicate mineral
quartz is the only silicate mineral that is pure silicon and oxygen, with no
other atoms such as metals within the chemical structure of this mineral.
The abundance of metals in
nesosilicates and sorosilicates gives these minerals
a darker color. Consequently, these
silicate minerals are called the dark silicates. The scarcity of metals in tectosilicates
gives these minerals a lighter color.
Consequently, these silicate minerals are called the light
silicates. In between these two extremes
are the inosilicates and the phyllosilicates, which have intermediate amounts
of metals giving them an intermediate color.
Consequently, these silicate minerals are called the intermediate
silicates. The abundance of metals
within the dark silicates also makes these minerals the most dense among all
silicates. The scarcity of metals within
the light silicates also makes these minerals the least dense among all the
silicates. The intermediate silicates
have intermediate densities between these two extremes.
Suppose we begin with
tectosilicates and warm the temperature by adding thermal energy (heat). The added thermal energy (heat) breaks
chemical bonds. As we continue to make
the minerals warmer and warmer by adding more and more thermal energy (heat),
we break more and more chemical bonds.
Eventually, we have broken so many chemical bonds that we have destroyed
the three-dimensional structures of the tectosilicates, leaving two-dimensional
molecular sheets that are no longer bonded with one another. By warming the temperature, we have changed
the tectosilicate into a collection of phyllosilicates. If we continue to add thermal energy (heat),
we continue to break chemical bonds.
Eventually, we have broken so many chemical bonds that we have destroyed
the two-dimensional structure of the phyllosilicates, leaving one-dimensional
molecular chains that are no longer bonded with one another. By warming the temperature, we have changed
the phyllosilicates into a collection of inosilicates. If we continue to add thermal energy (heat),
we continue to break chemical bonds.
Ultimately, we have broken so many chemical bonds that we have destroyed
the one-dimensional structure of the inosilicates, leaving individual silicon
atoms that are no longer bonded with one another. By warming the temperature, we have changed
the inosilicates into a collection of nesosilicates. We deduce that the dark silicates
(nesosilicates and sorosilicates) have the hottest
melting temperatures, the light silicates (tectosilicates) have the lowest
melting temperatures, and the intermediate silicates (inosilicates and
phyllosilicates) have intermediate melting temperatures. We may confirm this progression of melting
temperatures by beginning with nesosilicates and cooling the temperature by
extracting thermal energy (heat). The
extraction of thermal energy (heat) forms chemical bonds. As we continue to make the minerals cooler
and cooler by extracting more and more thermal energy (heat), we form more and
more chemical bonds. Eventually, we have
formed so many chemical bonds that we no longer have individual silicon atoms
that are separate from one another; we have one-dimensional molecular chains of
silicon-oxygen bonds. By cooling the
temperature, we have changed the nesosilicates into inosilicates. If we continue to extract thermal energy
(heat), we continue to form chemical bonds.
Eventually, we have formed so many chemical bonds that we no longer have
inosilicates that are separate from one another; we have two-dimensional
molecular sheets of silicon-oxygen bonds.
By cooling the temperature, we have changed the inosilicates into
phyllosilicates. If we continue to
extract thermal energy (heat), we continue to form chemical bonds. Ultimately, we have formed so many chemical
bonds that we no longer have phyllosilicates that are separate from one
another; we have three-dimensional molecular structures of silicon-oxygen
bonds. By cooling the temperature, we
have changed the phyllosilicates into tectosilicates. Again, we deduce that the dark silicates
(nesosilicates and sorosilicates) have the hottest
melting temperatures, light silicates (tectosilicates) have the lowest melting
temperatures, and intermediate silicates (inosilicates and phyllosilicates)
have intermediate melting temperatures.
In summary, most silicate
minerals can be subdivided into three subcategories: the dark silicates, the
intermediate silicates, and the light silicates. At one extreme, the dark silicates have the
most amount of metals such as iron and magnesium chemically bonded with the
silicon atoms, which are themselves bonded with oxygen atoms between them. This abundance of metals give these dark
silicates a darker color, hence their name.
This abundance of metals also makes the dark silicates the most dense
silicates. Dark silicates also have the
warmest melting temperatures and the highest oxygen-to-silicon ratios. Caution: dark silicates have the least complex chemical structure. The dark silicates include nesosilicates,
such as olivines and garnets, and sorosilicates,
such as epidotes. At the opposite
extreme, the light silicates have the least amount of metals chemically bonded
with the silicon atoms, which are themselves bonded with oxygen atoms between
them. This scarcity of metals gives
these light silicates a lighter color, hence their name. This scarcity of metals also makes the light
silicates the least dense silicates.
Light silicates also have the coolest melting temperatures and the lowest
oxygen-to-silicon ratios. Caution: light
silicates have the most complex
chemical structure. The light silicates
include tectosilicates, such as zeolites, feldspars, and quartz. The intermediate silicates are in between
these two extremes, with an intermediate amount of metals, an intermediate
color, intermediate densities, intermediate melting temperatures, intermediate
oxygen-to-silicon ratios, and intermediate chemical complexity. The intermediate silicates include
inosilicates, such as pyroxenes and amphiboles, and phyllosilicates, such as
serpentines and micas. In brief, most
silicate minerals can be categorized into a spectrum. At one extreme, the dark silicates have the
greatest abundance of metals, the darkest color, the highest densities, the
warmest melting temperatures, the highest oxygen-to-silicon ratios, and the least complex chemical structure. At the other extreme, the light silicates
have the least abundance of metals, the lightest color, the lowest densities,
the coolest melting temperatures, the lowest oxygen-to-silicon ratios, and the most complex chemical structure. The intermediate silicates are in between
these two extremes.
Consider an organic molecule
where a carbon atom covalently bonds to another carbon atom which covalently
bonds to another carbon atom which covalently bonds to another carbon atom and
so on and so forth, but ultimately the last carbon atom covalently bonds back
to the first carbon atom. These rings of
carbon-carbon covalent bonds (also bonded with other atoms) are the cycloalkane
organic molecules. Once again, there are
silicate minerals analogous to these organic molecules, providing further
evidence that life could hypothetically evolve based on inorganic silicate
minerals instead of organic molecules. Consider a silicate mineral where a silicon
atom covalently bonds to another silicon atom (with an oxygen atom between them
of course) which covalently bonds to another silicon atom (with an oxygen atom
between them of course) which covalently bonds to another silicon atom (with an
oxygen atom between them of course) and so on and so forth, but ultimately the
last silicon atom covalently bonds back to the first silicon atom (with an
oxygen atom between them of course).
These rings of silicon-oxygen covalent bonds (also bonded with other
atoms) are the cyclosilicates. Examples of cyclosilicates
include three-silicon rings such as the benitoites,
four-silicon rings such as the axinites, and
six-silicon rings such as the beryls and the
tourmalines.
Although the vast majority of
all minerals are silicate minerals, there are other mineral groups. The sulfates are a mineral group based on the
sulfur-oxygen tetrahedral group SO42–. Examples of
sulfate minerals include gypsum, anglesite, epsomite,
and thenardite.
The carbonates are a mineral group based on the carbon-oxygen trigonal
planar group CO32–. Examples of carbonate minerals include
calcite, magnesite, dolomite, and smithsonite. The oxides are the mineral group where metals
bond with oxygen. Examples of oxide
minerals include iron oxides such as hematite, magnetite, and wüstite, aluminum oxides such as corundum, and copper
oxides such as cuprite and tenorite. The halides are the mineral group where
halogens such as fluorine, chlorine, and bromine bond with metals. Examples of halide minerals include halite, villiaumite, fluorite, and sylvite. The native elements are minerals composed of
a single type of atom, usually metals such as pure aluminum, pure iron, pure
nickel, pure copper, pure zinc, pure silver, pure platinum, pure gold, or pure
lead. Caution: if a metal bonds with
oxygen, the mineral is classified as an oxide, not as a native element. Also, if a metal bonds with a halogen, the
mineral is classified as a halide, not as a native element.
Petrology
Petrology is the study of
rocks, and a petrologist is someone who studies rocks. These words are derived from the Greek root
petro- for rock. For example, the name
Peter means rock. A rock is defined as a
naturally occurring solid inorganic object that is an aggregate (a mixture) of
minerals. Since a rock is an aggregate
(a mixture) of many different minerals, a rock does not have a definite
chemical structure. This is the most
important difference between a rock and a mineral. Both minerals and rocks are naturally
occurring solid inorganic objects.
However, a mineral has a definite chemical structure, while a rock does
not have a definite chemical structure, since it is an aggregate (a mixture) of
minerals. Since a rock does not have a definite
chemical structure, there are significant variations in density, composition,
and other properties even for a particular type of rock. In other words, whereas a particular mineral
is unique, a particular rock is not unique.
Petrography is the classification of rocks, the study of different types
of rocks. Petrogenesis
is the study of how rocks form. Broadly
speaking, there are three different ways that rocks can form. Hence, there are three broad categories of
rocks: igneous rocks, sedimentary rocks, and metamorphic rocks.
If we add sufficient heat to
a rock, it melts to become molten rock (liquid rock). If molten rock cools, it may crystallize
(solidify) back into solid rock. Any
rock that forms from the crystallization of molten rock is called igneous rock,
one of the three main types of rock. We
can classify igneous rocks based on where they form. Molten rock deep within the Earth is called
magma, while molten rock that has extruded out of the Earth is called
lava. We will discuss shortly a
significant difference between molten rock deep within the Earth and molten
rock that has extruded out of the Earth that justifies using these two
different terms, magma and lava. For
now, we simply mention that different names are often used for the same thing
in colloquial languages. While they are
living animals, chickens, turkeys, and ducks are called fowl, but after they
have been slaughtered and are prepared as food they are called poultry. While they are living animals, bulls and cows
are called cattle, but after they have been slaughtered and are prepared as
food they are called beef. While they
are living animals, pigs are called swine, but after they have been slaughtered
and are prepared as food they are called pork.
While they are living animals, deer, elk, moose, and reindeer are called
cervids, but after they have been slaughtered and are
prepared as food they are called venison.
The Spanish word for living fish is pez, but
the Spanish word for slaughtered fish that are prepared as food is pescado. There are
countless other examples in colloquial languages. Magma that crystallizes into solid rock is
called intrusive igneous rock, since it forms deep within the Earth. Lava that crystallizes into solid rock is
called extrusive igneous rock, since it formed from lava that extruded out of
the Earth. Another term for intrusive
igneous rock is plutonic igneous rock, and another term for extrusive igneous
rock is volcanic igneous rock.
Since they form deep within
the Earth where it is hot, intrusive/plutonic igneous rocks typically take a
long time to cool and crystallize. This
slower, more gradual cooling builds large crystals throughout the rock. The result is a rock with a coarse-grained
texture, meaning that it feels more rough to the touch. Since they form from lava that has extruded
out of the Earth, extrusive/volcanic igneous rocks typically take a short time
to cool and crystallize. This faster,
more rapid cooling only permits small crystals to be built throughout the
rock. The result is a rock with a
fine-grained texture, meaning that it feels more smooth to the touch. The term for the coarse-grained texture of
igneous rocks is phaneritic, since the Greek root phanero- means visible, meaning that the crystals in a phaneritic igneous rock are large enough to be visible with
the naked (unaided) eye. The term for
the fine-grained texture of igneous rocks is aphanitic, since again the Greek
root phanero- means visible and the Greek root a-
means not, meaning that the crystals in an aphanitic igneous rock are too small
to be visible with the naked (unaided) eye.
We require at least a magnifying glass, sometimes even a microscope, to
see the crystals in an igneous rock with an aphanitic texture. An igneous rock that takes an extremely long
time to cool and crystalize would have an extremely coarse-grained
texture. This extreme form of the phaneritic texture is called pegmatitic. An igneous rock can take an extremely short
time to cool and crystalize. This virtually
instantaneous crystallization is called quenching. In this case, the igneous rock has an
extremely fine-grained texture. This
extreme form of the aphanitic texture is called glassy, since the rock feels as
smooth as glass. The extrusive/volcanic igneous
rock obsidian has a glassy texture, since it forms by quenching. Obsidian is often black in color, which
together with its glassy texture makes obsidian a gorgeous rock. The extrusive/volcanic igneous rock pumice
also has a glassy texture, since it forms by quenching. However, the abundance of vesicles (cavities)
within pumice causes this rock to feel rough to the touch, even though it has a
glassy texture. The abundance of
vesicles (cavities) within pumice also gives this rock a density that is
usually less than liquid water, permitting this rock to float in liquid
water. In summary, igneous rocks that
take an extremely long time to cool and crystallize have a pegmatitic
(extremely coarse-grained) texture, igneous rocks that take a moderately long
time to cool and crystallize have a phaneritic
(moderately coarse-grained) texture, igneous rocks that take a moderately short
time to cool and crystallize have an aphanitic (moderately fine-grained)
texture, and igneous rocks that take an extremely short time to cool and
crystallize (quenching) have a glassy (extremely fine-grained) texture. Typically, extrusive/volcanic igneous rocks
have an aphanitic texture, perhaps even glassy, since they take a short amount
of time to cool and crystallize. Typically,
intrusive/plutonic igneous rocks have a phaneritic
texture, perhaps even pegmatitic, since they take a
long amount of time to cool and crystallize.
In brief, we can calculate the cooling history of an igneous rock (how
long it took the rock to form) by simply feeling its texture, whether it feels
more rough to the touch (coarse-grained texture) or more smooth to the touch
(fine-grained texture). Caution: some
igneous rocks have both large crystals and small crystals in the same
rock. This occurs when there is an
interruption in the cooling history of the rock. This unusual texture is called
porphyritic. The large crystals in a
porphyritic igneous rock are called the phenocrysts,
while the small crystals in a porphyritic igneous rock are called the
groundmass.
We can also classify igneous
rocks based on their mineral composition.
Since the vast majority of all minerals are silicates, we classify
igneous rocks based on their silicate mineral composition. Igneous rocks that are composed predominantly
of dark silicates are called mafic igneous rocks. The word mafic is a combination of the words
magnesium and ferrum, the Latin word for iron. As we discussed, dark silicates have the most
amount of metals such as iron and magnesium.
Igneous rocks that are composed predominantly of light silicates are
called felsic igneous rocks. The word
felsic is a combination of the words feldspar and silica, the word for molten
quartz. As we discussed, feldspar and
quartz are two examples of light silicates.
Igneous rocks that are composed predominantly of intermediate silicates
are simply called intermediate igneous rocks.
Everything we have discussed about silicates therefore also applies to
the igneous rocks that they compose. In
particular, mafic igneous rocks have the most amount of metals, are darkest in
color, are most dense, and have the hottest melting temperatures, while felsic
igneous rocks have the least amount of metals, are lightest in color, are least
dense, and have the lowest melting temperatures. Intermediate igneous rocks are between these
two extremes. The Bowen reaction series
quantifies the melting-temperature spectrum for igneous rocks, named for the
Canadian petrologist Norman L. Bowen who discovered this progression of melting
temperatures for igneous rocks in the early twentieth century. According to the Bowen reaction series, as we
add more and more heat to igneous rocks, felsic rocks melt first, intermediate
rocks then melt at somewhat hotter temperatures, and finally mafic rocks melt
at the hottest temperatures. Conversely,
if we extract more and more heat from molten rock, mafic rocks crystallize
first, intermediate rocks then crystallize at somewhat lower temperatures, and
finally felsic igneous rocks crystallize at the lowest temperatures.
The two most important mafic
igneous rocks are basalt and gabbro.
Both basalt and gabbro have large quantities of metals, are dark in
color, have high densities, and have hot melting temperatures. The only difference between basalt and gabbro
is where they form and thus their cooling histories and their textures. Gabbro forms intrusively/plutonically
deep within the Earth and therefore cools and crystallizes over a long period
of time. Thus, gabbro forms with large
crystals resulting in a coarse-grained (rough) texture. Basalt forms extrusively/volcanically
on the surface of the Earth and therefore cools and crystallizes over a short
period of time. Thus, basalt forms small
crystals resulting in a fine-grained (smooth) texture. In other words, gabbro is the
intrusive/plutonic form of basalt, or basalt is the extrusive/volcanic form of
gabbro. The two most important felsic
igneous rocks are rhyolite and granite. Both
rhyolite and granite have small quantities of metals, are light in color, have
low densities, and have low melting temperatures. The only difference between rhyolite and
granite is where they form and thus their cooling histories and their
textures. Granite forms intrusively/plutonically deep within the Earth and therefore cools and
crystallizes over a long period of time.
Thus, granite forms with large crystals resulting in a coarse-grained
(rough) texture. Rhyolite forms extrusively/volcanically on the surface of the Earth and
therefore cools and crystallizes over a short period of time. Thus, rhyolite forms small crystals resulting
in a fine-grained (smooth) texture. In
other words, granite is the intrusive/plutonic form of rhyolite, or rhyolite is
the extrusive/volcanic form of granite.
The two most important intermediate igneous rocks are andesite and
diorite. Both andesite and diorite have
intermediate quantities of metals, are intermediate in color, have intermediate
densities, and have intermediate melting temperatures. The only difference between andesite and diorite
is where they form and thus their cooling histories and their textures. Diorite forms intrusively/plutonically
deep within the Earth and therefore cools and crystallizes over a long period
of time. Thus, diorite forms with large
crystals resulting in a coarse-grained (rough) texture. Andesite forms extrusively/volcanically
on the surface of the Earth and therefore cools and crystallizes over a short
period of time. Thus, andesite forms
small crystals resulting in a fine-grained (smooth) texture. In other words, diorite is the
intrusive/plutonic form of andesite, or andesite is the extrusive/volcanic form
of diorite.
Rocks on the surface of the
Earth are subjected to wind, rain, and other natural forces that degrade
(weaken and destroy) the rocks, ultimately breaking them into small pieces
called sediments. These natural forces
also move these sediments from one location to another. Layer upon layer of sediments may accumulate
at a particular location until the weight of the sediments begins to compress
the sediments. Chemical reactions may
cement the sediments together.
Eventually, the sediments become lithified, meaning that they have
become a rock. Any rock that forms from
the lithification of sediment is called sedimentary
rock, one of the three main types of rock.
Sedimentary rocks are classified into three subcategories: clastic
sedimentary rocks, chemical sedimentary rocks, and biogenic sedimentary rocks.
A clastic sedimentary rock
lithifies through the action of physical forces. If large sediments are lithified to form a
clastic sedimentary rock, then the rock will have a coarse-grained texture,
meaning that it will feel rough to the touch.
If small sediments are lithified to form a clastic sedimentary rock,
then the rock will have a fine-grained texture, meaning that it will feel
smooth to the touch. The Wentworth scale
is a sediment size scale, named for the American geologist Chester K. Wentworth
who defined this scale in the year 1922.
According to the Wentworth scale, sediments are classified as gravels,
sands, silts, or clay/mud based on their size.
The largest sediments are gravels, which lithify into the extremely
coarse-grained clastic sedimentary rocks conglomerate (if the sediments are
rounded) or breccia (if the sediments are angular). Sands are somewhat smaller sediments, which
lithify into the moderately coarse-grained clastic sedimentary rock
sandstone. Silts are even smaller
sediments, which lithify into the moderately fine-grained clastic sedimentary
rock siltstone. Finally, the smallest
sediments are clay/mud, which lithify into the extremely fine-grained clastic
sedimentary rock shale.
Whenever natural forces
degrade (weaken and destroy) rocks, the resulting sediments always form with
irregular, jagged shapes. The technical
term for this irregular, jagged shape is angular. If the sediments are eroded (moved) over a
far distance, the sediments collide with each other. These collisions tend to smooth out the
shapes of sediments. Liquid water and
even water vapor in the air will also contribute to the smoothing of the shapes
of the sediments if they are eroded (moved) over a far distance. The technical term for this smoothed shape is
rounded. If the sediments are eroded
(moved) over a short distance, the sediments do not have the opportunity to
collide with each other significantly, which would have smoothed out their
shapes. Also, liquid water as well as
water vapor in the air will also not have much opportunity to smooth out the
shapes of the sediments if they are eroded (moved) over a short distance. Thus, the sediments retain their original
angular shape. In summary, we can
calculate the distance (from how far away) sediments were eroded (moved) from
the shape of the sediments, whether the shape is angular (more irregular or
jagged) or rounded (more smooth). For
example, the clastic sedimentary rock conglomerate is lithified from gravels
with more rounded shapes, while the clastic sedimentary rock breccia is
lithified from gravels with more angular shapes. Therefore, we conclude that the gravels that
lithified to form conglomerate were eroded (moved) over a far distance, while
the gravels that lithified to form breccia were eroded (moved) over a short
distance.
Some clastic sedimentary
rocks are lithified from poorly sorted sediments, meaning that the sediments
are all different sizes (some large and some small). Some clastic sedimentary rocks are lithified
from well sorted sediments, meaning that the sediments are all roughly the same
size (all small). This sorting of
sediments within a clastic sedimentary rock reveals the energy of the natural
force that eroded (moved) the sediment.
A major river has a large quantity of energy, meaning that it is able to
erode (move) large sediments and certainly small sediments. Hence, the resulting clastic sedimentary
rocks will be poorly sorted. Conversely,
a small stream has a small quantity of energy, meaning that it is only able to
erode (move) small sediments. Hence, the
resulting clastic sedimentary rocks will be well sorted. As we will discuss later in the course, a
glacier is a giant mass of ice with tremendous energy. Hence, a glacier is able to move giant
boulders in addition to small sediments.
Hence, the resulting clastic sedimentary rocks will be poorly sorted if
the sediments were eroded (moved) by a glacier.
As we will discuss shortly, we can determine the history of the Earth
from rocks, in particular from sedimentary rocks. Our current discussion already reveals how
this is possible. By studying the
sorting of sediments within a clastic sedimentary rock, we can actually
determine the history of the surrounding landscape. For example, the sorting of sediments within
a clastic sedimentary rock may reveal that perhaps there may have been a small
stream in a particular landscape followed by perhaps an ice age with glaciers
followed by perhaps a major river, and so on and so forth.
A chemical sedimentary rock
lithifies through the process of chemical reactions. Common examples of chemical sedimentary rocks
include limestone which is the lithification of the
mineral calcite, dolostone which is the lithification of the mineral dolomite, and chert which is the lithification
of the mineral quartz.
A biogenic sedimentary rock
is lithified from organic materials (lifeforms) together with inorganic
sediments. Chalk, coquina, and
bituminous coal are three common examples of biogenic sedimentary rocks. The biogenic sedimentary rock chalk forms
from the lithification of microscopic ocean
plankton. Caution: the chalk that is
used to write on chalkboards is artificially manufactured from the minerals
gypsum and calcite. The chalkboards
themselves are manufactured from slate, which is a rock that we will discuss
shortly. Coquina is a gorgeous biogenic
sedimentary rock that is lithified from many different types of shells from
various invertebrate animals. The
formation of the biogenic sedimentary rock bituminous coal is as follows. We begin with many layers of dead plants that
are compacted with clay/mud. In addition
to compacting the organic matter, the clay/mud also serves to prevent the
decomposition of the organic matter.
Over thousands of years, the accumulation of sediments over the organic
matter compresses it to high densities until it is classified as peat. As sedimentary rock continues to lithify over
the peat, it is further compressed until it is classified as lignite (or brown
coal). If the lignite (or brown coal) is
compressed to even higher densities over millions of years, it is eventually lithified
to the biogenic sedimentary rock bituminous coal. Note that if bituminous coal continues to be subjected
to high pressures, it may become anthracite, which is another type of rock that
we will discuss shortly. If anthracite
is subjected to further pressures, it may become graphite, one of the mineral
forms of carbon. Graphite is used in
writing utensils such as pencils, but note that the graphite in these writing
utensils is often incorrectly referred to as lead because humans used to write
with lead, which no one should do since lead is poisonous! If the mineral graphite is subjected to
enormous pressures over millions of years, it is compressed to diamond, another
mineral form of carbon that is the most hard mineral on the Mohs scale, as we
discussed. Lignite (or brown coal),
bituminous coal, and anthracite are all particular examples of fossil
fuels. All fossil fuels can be divided
into three broad categories: petroleum (crude oil), natural gas, and coal. Natural gas forms when particular microorganisms
that generate methane are compacted under modest pressures over millions of
years. As we discussed, coal forms when
plants are compacted under high pressures over millions of years. Geologists continue to debate how petroleum
(crude oil) forms. Older theories
claimed that petroleum (crude oil) forms over millions of years like coal and
natural gas, but some modern theories claim that petroleum (crude oil) can form
in only a few decades. One form of
petroleum is bitumen, which is also called asphalt. However, the word asphalt is colloquially
used for an artificially manufactured substance that is a mixture of bitumen
and various minerals. This manufactured
substance should be called asphalt concrete (or asphalt cement) to distinguish
it from naturally occurring asphalt, which should itself be called bitumen to
avoid confusion with asphalt concrete (or asphalt cement).
Heat, pressure, and chemical
reactions can gradually change one rock into a completely new rock. Any rock that forms by changing a
pre-existing rock is called a metamorphic rock, one of the three main types of
rock. The original rock is called the
parent rock, while the new metamorphic rock that formed from the parent rock is
called the daughter rock. Contact
metamorphism is the process by which metamorphic rocks form primarily from
heat, with pressure and chemical reactions being less important processes. Regional metamorphism is the process by which
metamorphic rocks form primarily from pressure, with heat and chemical
reactions being less important processes.
Hydrothermal metamorphism is the process by which metamorphic rocks form
primarily from chemical reactions, with heat and pressure being less important
processes. The term hydrothermal is
derived from the Greek root hydro- meaning water, since the chemicals are
almost always dissolved within water.
Metamorphic rocks can be subclassified based on their shape. Metamorphic rocks that have a folded shape
resulting from asymmetrical regional metamorphism (asymmetrical pressures) are
called foliated metamorphic rocks, while metamorphic rocks that do not have a
folded shape are called non-foliated metamorphic rocks. Non-foliated metamorphic rocks may form from
symmetrical regional metamorphism (symmetrical pressures), but non-foliated
metamorphic rocks may also form from contact metamorphism (heat) or from
hydrothermal metamorphism (chemical reactions).
If we begin with siltstone or shale as the parent rock and apply
asymmetrical pressures, the result is the daughter rock slate, a foliated
metamorphic rock. We can begin with
slate itself as the parent rock and apply further asymmetrical pressures to
yield the daughter rock phyllite, a more severely
foliated metamorphic rock. We can begin
with phyllite as the parent rock and apply even
further asymmetrical pressures to yield the daughter rock schist, an even more
severely foliated metamorphic rock. We
can begin with schist as the parent rock and continue to apply asymmetrical
pressures to yield the daughter rock gneiss, a severely foliated metamorphic
rock. If we begin with the biogenic
sedimentary rock bituminous coal as the parent rock and apply symmetrical
pressures, the result is the daughter rock anthracite, a non-foliated
metamorphic rock. Another non-foliated
metamorphic rock is marble, the daughter rock to the chemical sedimentary rocks
limestone and dolostone. Yet another non-foliated metamorphic rock is
quartzite, the daughter rock to the clastic sedimentary rock sandstone. Another non-foliated metamorphic rock is hornfels, the daughter rock to the clastic sedimentary rock
shale.
Metamorphic rocks that form
deep within the Earth may be subjected to sufficient heat to melt them. That molten rock may later cool and
crystallize into an igneous rock. Metamorphic
rocks may also be thrust to the surface of the Earth by a violet event, such as
an earthquake. This metamorphic rock
would now be subjected to wind, rain, and other natural forces that will
degrade (weaken and destroy) the rock, ultimately breaking it into sediments,
which may later lithify into a sedimentary rock. An intrusive/plutonic igneous rock that
formed deep within the Earth is subjected to heat, pressure, and chemical
reactions that may gradually change the igneous rock into a metamorphic
rock. In summary, rocks are continuously
changing from one type to another, and any rock can become any other type of
rock. This is called the rock
cycle. It is difficult for us to believe
that the rock cycle actually occurs, since in most cases we do not witness rocks
change before our eyes. Most rocks
change very slowly over long periods of time, although there are rare cases
when we can witness before our very eyes rocks forming in a short period of
time, such as quenching resulting in igneous rocks with a glassy texture. Throughout this course, we will discuss
innumerable manifestations of the dynamic planet Earth. The word dynamic means continuously changing. The opposite of the word dynamic is the word
static, meaning not changing. Our planet
Earth is not static. Our planet Earth is
dynamic, since it is continuously changing, and the rock cycle is one of the
many processes we will discuss in this course that reveals that our planet
Earth is continuously changing.
If heat changes a parent rock
into a metamorphic daughter rock, that heat must not melt the rock. If the rock were to melt and recrystallize
into a solid rock, then we must classify the rock as an igneous rock, not as a
metamorphic rock. The rock migmatite forms from heat that melts some parts of the rock
which then recrystallize into solid rock, but the heat also changes other parts
of the rock without melting those parts of the rock. Some petrologists classify migmatite as igneous, while other petrologists classify migmatite as metamorphic.
Still other petrologists classify migmatite as
both igneous and metamorphic, and yet other petrologists actually place migmatite in a unique category of rock that is intermediate
between igneous and metamorphic. There
will never be a consensus among petrologists on the classification of migmatite.
Therefore, migmatite is a rock that cannot be
classified. We now realize that not all
rocks can be classified as either igneous, sedimentary, or metamorphic. As another example, the rock tuff partly
forms from the crystallization of molten rock and partly forms from the lithification of sediment.
Some petrologists classify tuff as igneous, while other petrologists
classify tuff as sedimentary. Still
other petrologists classify tuff as both igneous and sedimentary, and yet other
petrologists actually place tuff in a unique category of rock that is
intermediate between igneous and sedimentary.
Again, there will never be a consensus among petrologists on the
classification of tuff. Therefore, tuff
is another rock that cannot be classified.
A more subtle example is the sedimentary rock marlstone, which is
intermediate between the sedimentary rocks limestone and shale. Although both limestone and shale are
sedimentary rocks and therefore marlstone is also a sedimentary rock, limestone
is a chemical sedimentary rock while shale is a clastic sedimentary rock. Therefore, marlstone is a sedimentary rock
that is intermediate between chemical sedimentary and clastic sedimentary. There will never be a consensus among petrologists
on the precise classification of marlstone.
Therefore, marlstone is yet another rock that cannot be classified.
The Structure and the Composition of the Geosphere
The Earth is mostly covered
with oceans, while a small fraction of the surface of the Earth is
continents. The continents are composed
of mostly felsic igneous rock, for reasons we will make clear shortly. On the surface of the continents is a thin
layer of sedimentary rock, having formed from the lithification
of sediments that themselves formed from natural forces degrading rocks into
sediments. Therefore, if we were to
drill into the continent, we would first drill through a layer of sedimentary
rock followed by rhyolite (extrusive/volcanic felsic rock, having crystallized
near the surface of the Earth) followed by granite (intrusive/plutonic felsic
rock, having crystallized deep within the Earth). The ocean basins (at the bottom of the ocean)
are composed of mostly mafic igneous rock, for reasons we will make clear
shortly. On the surface of the ocean
basins (at the bottom of the ocean) is a thin layer of sedimentary rock, having
formed from the lithification of sediments that
themselves formed from natural forces degrading rocks into sediments. Therefore, if we were to drill into the ocean
basins (at the bottom of the ocean), we would first drill through a layer of
sedimentary rock followed by basalt (extrusive/volcanic mafic rock, having
crystallized near the surface of the Earth) followed by gabbro
(intrusive/plutonic mafic rock, having crystallized deep within the Earth).
The geosphere (the solid part
of the Earth) is layered. The most dense
layer of the geosphere is the core at its center. The core is composed primarily of metals,
such as iron and nickel. The next layer
of the geosphere surrounding the core is the mantle, which is less dense than
the core. The mantle is composed
primarily of rocks, which are themselves composed primarily of silicate
minerals. There are also fair amounts of
metals in the mantle, such as iron. In
summary, the mantle is composed of iron-rich silicate rock. The outermost layer of the geosphere
surrounding the mantle is the crust. The
crust is the least dense layer of the geosphere and the thinnest layer of the
geosphere. The crust is also composed of
silicate rock, but there are fewer metals such as iron in the crust as compared
with the mantle. In summary, the crust
is composed of iron-poor silicate rock.
The Earth’s core is itself
layered. At the very center of the geosphere
is the inner core, composed primarily of metals such as iron and nickel. The temperature of the Earth’s core is very
hot, for reasons we will discuss shortly.
These hot temperatures should be sufficient to melt metals into the
molten state. However, the pressure of
the inner core is so enormous that the metals are compressed into the solid
state even though they are at temperatures where they should be in the molten
state. Since the inner core is composed
of solid metal, the inner core is also called the solid core. The layer around the solid (inner) core is
the outer core, which is also composed primarily of metals such as iron and
nickel. Again, the temperature of the
outer core is sufficiently hot to melt metals into the molten state. Although the pressure of the outer core is
enormous by human standards, the pressure is nevertheless not as high as the
pressure of the inner core. Therefore,
the pressure of the outer core is not sufficient to compress the metals into
the solid state. The outer core is
therefore molten, as metals should be at these hot temperatures. Since the outer core is composed of molten
metal, the outer core is also called the molten core. Surrounding the molten (outer) core is the
first layer of the mantle: the mesosphere.
The Greek root meso- means middle. For example, Central America is sometimes
called Mesoamerica, as in Middle America.
Therefore, the word mesosphere simply means middle sphere or middle
layer. The next layer of the mantle that
surrounds the mesosphere is the asthenosphere.
This layer of the mantle is composed of weak rock. Indeed, the Greek root astheno-
means weak. The asthenosphere is
composed of weak rock that is still mostly solid, although parts of the
asthenosphere are composed of rock that is partially molten. Finally, the rest of the mantle together with
the entire crust is called the lithosphere.
The lithosphere is of varying thickness.
Some parts of the lithosphere are so thick that they protrude out of the
oceans. These thick parts of the
lithosphere are called continents. The
parts of the lithosphere that are thin are the ocean basins at the bottom of
the ocean.
Since density is defined as
mass divided by volume, density is inversely proportional to volume. Therefore, more dense rock must occupy a
smaller volume, while less dense rock must occupy a larger volume. Some parts of the lithosphere are so thick
that they protrude out of the oceans; these are the continents. Since the continental parts of the
lithosphere are thick occupying a large volume, they must be composed of less
dense rock. This reveals why the
continents are composed primarily of felsic rock, since felsic rock is the
least dense igneous rock. Other parts of
the lithosphere are so thin that they do not protrude out of the ocean; these
are the ocean basins at the bottom of the ocean. Since the oceanic parts of the lithosphere
are thin occupying a small volume, they must be composed of more dense rock. This reveals why the ocean basins are
composed primarily of mafic rock, since mafic rock is the most dense igneous
rock.
How have geophysicists
determined the layers of the geosphere, their thicknesses, their compositions,
and their physical states (solid or molten)?
Have geologists drilled to the center of the Earth and directly studied
the interior of the Earth? No, we have
come nowhere near drilling to the center of the Earth. We have barely drilled through the Earth’s
crust, which is by far the thinnest layer of the geosphere. We will never have technology advanced enough
to drill far beyond the crust, and reaching the core is out of the
question. Geophysicists have determined
the layers of the geosphere, their thicknesses, their compositions, and their
physical states (solid or molten) using seismic waves. We will discuss earthquakes in more detail
shortly. For now, earthquakes cause
waves that propagate (travel) throughout the entire geosphere. These waves are called seismic waves, and a
seismometer is a device that detects seismic waves. There are millions of earthquakes on planet
Earth every day, as we will discuss shortly.
Most earthquakes are so weak that humans cannot feel them, but
seismometers sensitive (accurate) enough can detect incredibly weak seismic
waves. Geophysicists have placed thousands
of seismometers all over planet Earth to detect these seismic waves. Surface seismic waves propagate (travel)
along the surface of the geosphere, while body seismic waves propagate (travel)
throughout the interior of the geosphere.
There are two different types of body seismic waves: pressure waves and
shear-stress waves. A pressure is a
force exerted directly onto (perpendicularly onto) an area. Consequently, a pressure wave may propagate
(travel) through solids, liquids, and even gases, since all that is necessary
for a pressure wave to propagate is for atoms or molecules to collide with
other atoms or molecules in the direction of propagation. A shear-stress is a force exerted along
(parallel across) an area. Consequently,
a shear-stress wave may propagate (travel) through solids but not through
liquids or gases, since there must be strong chemical bonding for atoms or
molecules to pull other atoms or molecules along (parallel across) an
area. Also, pressure waves propagate
faster than shear-stress waves.
Therefore, a seismometer will always detect pressure waves first. For this reason, pressure waves are also
called primary waves. A seismometer will
always detect shear-stress waves second, since they propagate slower than
pressure (primary) waves. For this
reason, shear-stress waves are also called secondary waves. By an amazing coincidence, the words pressure
and primary both begin with the same letter.
Therefore, these waves are also called P-waves. By another amazing coincidence, the words
shear, stress, and secondary also all begin with the same letter! Therefore, these waves are also called
S-waves. We can calculate how distant an
earthquake occurred from a seismometer from the arrival times of the P-waves
and the S-waves. If a seismometer
detects the S-waves a long duration of time after the P-waves, the earthquake
must have occurred far from the seismometer, since the P-waves had sufficient
distance to propagate (travel) far ahead of the S-waves, resulting in a long
delay between them. If the seismometer
detects the S-waves immediately after the P-waves, the earthquake must have
occurred near the seismometer, since the P-waves did not have sufficient
distance to propagate (travel) that far ahead of the S-waves, resulting in a
short delay between them. In summary, we
calculate the distance the seismic waves propagated from the arrival times of
the P-waves and the S-waves. We now have
the distance of propagation, and we certainly know the time of propagation,
since we know when the earthquake occurred and when the seismometer detected
the seismic waves. We can then calculate
the speed of the seismic waves, since the speed of anything equals its distance
traveled divided by its time of travel.
Once we have the speed of the seismic waves, we can determine the
properties of the materials that would cause that speed of propagation, whether
the material was solid metal, molten metal, solid rock, or molten rock. We can program a computer with all of these
data, and the computer can calculate the layers of the geosphere, their
thicknesses, their compositions, and their physical states (solid or molten)
from all of these data. Also, we are
certain that the interior of the Earth is at least partially molten, since
seismometers on the opposite side of planet Earth from an earthquake do not
detect S-waves; these seismometers only detect P-waves. As we discussed, S-waves cannot propagate
through liquids; they can only propagate through solids. However, P-waves can propagate through either
solids or liquids, as we discussed. In
fact, the opposite side of planet Earth from any earthquake is called the
shadow zones of that particular earthquake.
This term comes from the idea that the molten (outer) core casts a
shadow, preventing those seismometers from detecting S-waves. In actuality, the S-waves cannot propagate
through the molten (outer) core, while the P-waves can propagate through the
molten (outer) core. Hence, seismometers
in the shadow zones only detect P-waves from earthquakes on the opposite side
of planet Earth. In summary, by using
thousands of seismometers all over planet Earth that detect seismic waves from
millions of earthquakes each day and by running computer simulations,
geophysicists have determined the layers of the geosphere, their thicknesses,
their compositions, and their physical states.
One of the earliest examples of the successful use of these techniques
was when the Croatian geophysicist Andrija Mohorovičić
discovered the boundary between the crust and the mantle in the year 1909 using
seismic waves. Consequently, the
boundary between the crust and the mantle is called the Mohorovičić
discontinuity in his honor.
It cannot be accidental or
coincidental that the geosphere (the solid part of the Earth) is layered according
to density. Why are the inner layers
more dense while the outer layers are less dense? To explain this layering, we must discuss the
formation of the Earth. The Earth, its
Moon, the other planets and their moons, the Sun, and the entire Solar System
formed roughly 4.5 billion years ago.
The four planets closer to the Sun (Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars)
were born as small, dense planetesimals (baby
planets) that grew larger through accretion, which is the gaining of mass
through sticky collisions. During a
sticky collision, a significant fraction of the kinetic energy (moving energy)
of the colliding objects is converted into thermal energy (heat energy). Thus, objects that suffer from sticky
collisions become significantly warmer.
Therefore, as the Earth was forming and growing larger through
accretion, it became warmer. Eventually,
the Earth became so hot that it became almost entirely molten. While the Earth was almost entirely molten,
more dense materials were able to sink toward the center of the planet while
less dense materials were able to rise toward the surface of the planet. Most metals are more dense than most
rocks. That is, most rocks are less
dense than most metals. Therefore, most
of the metals sank toward the center of the planet, forming the core. Most of the rocks rose toward the surface of
the planet, forming the mantle and the crust.
The process by which any planet separates materials according to density
is called differentiation, and the planet is said to be differentiated. A planet larger than the Earth would be more
severely differentiated than the Earth, since it would have more mass and
therefore stronger gravity that would pull the metals towards the center of the
planet more strongly. A planet smaller
than the Earth would be less severely differentiated than the Earth, since it
would have less mass and therefore weaker gravity that would pull the metals
toward the center of the planet less strongly.
For example, planet Mars is smaller than the Earth. Therefore, Mars has less mass and thus weaker
gravity as compared with the Earth.
Hence, Mars is less severely differentiated as compared with the
Earth. Of course, planet Mars is still
differentiated. It has a dense core
composed primarily of metals such as iron, and it has less dense outer layers
composed primarily of rock.
Nevertheless, Mars is less severely differentiated as compared with the
Earth, meaning that not all of the metals sank toward the center of Mars to
form its core. This is also the case with
the Earth. Although most of the metals
sank toward the center of the Earth to form its core, there are still fair
amounts of metals in the mantle and small amounts of metals in the crust. Since Mars is less severely differentiated as
compared with the Earth, we find more iron on the surface of Mars as compared
with the amount of iron on the surface of the Earth. The abundance of iron on the surface of Mars
has oxidized. As we discussed, iron
oxide is commonly known as rust, which has a reddish color. This is why Mars is red. In fact, the nickname of planet Mars is the
Red Planet. Mars even appears red to the
naked eye (without the aid of a telescope or even binoculars) in our sky.
The Earth has a magnetic
field, but we do not completely understand how this magnetic field is
generated. According to older theories,
the Earth’s magnetic field is generated by its solid (inner) core. This theory may seem reasonable, since the
solid (inner) core is composed of ferromagnetic metals such as iron and nickel. However, we now realize that this old model
is too simplistic. According to more
modern theories, the Earth’s magnetic field is created by its molten (outer)
core. This more modern theory also seems
reasonable, since the molten (outer) core is also composed of ferromagnetic
metals such as iron and nickel. These
modern theories claim that the rotation of the Earth causes circulating
currents of molten metal in the outer core.
These circulating currents of molten metal in turn generate the Earth’s magnetic
field. These more modern theories seem
reasonable, but nevertheless these theories are not fully developed. If these models are correct, then the two
equally important variables that create a metallic-rocky planet’s magnetic
field is a metallic core that is at least partially molten and reasonably rapid
rotation. Indeed, among the four planets
closer to the Sun (Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars), the Earth has the
strongest magnetic field, since it is the only one of these four planets that
has both a partially molten metallic core and reasonably rapid rotation. For example, Venus probably has a partially
molten metallic core, but Venus has very slow rotation. Hence, Venus has a very weak magnetic
field. As another example, Mars has
reasonably rapid rotation, but Mars has a metallic core that is no longer
partially molten. Hence, Mars also has a
very weak magnetic field. Caution: we
are only comparing the magnetic fields of the four inner planets closer to the
Sun. Although the Earth has the strongest
magnetic field among the inner planets, its magnetic field is still weak
compared with all four outer planets further from the Sun (Jupiter, Saturn,
Uranus, and Neptune).
The overall structure of the
Earth’s magnetic field is very much similar to the magnetic field created by a
bar magnet, such as a refrigerator magnet.
In fact, the only difference between the Earth’s magnetic field and a
bar magnet’s magnetic field is strength.
The Earth’s magnetic field is thousands of times weaker than a bar
magnet’s magnetic field. That is, a bar
magnet’s magnetic field is thousands of times stronger than the Earth’s
magnetic field. Students often cannot
believe that a small refrigerator magnet could create a stronger magnetic field
than an entire planet, but this stands to reason actually. A refrigerator magnet’s magnetic field is
strong enough to lift paper clips for example, but the Earth’s magnetic field
is not this strong. The Earth’s magnetic
field is everywhere around us, yet we do not see paper clips floating around
us! A refrigerator magnet’s magnetic
field is strong enough to lift paper clips against planet Earth’s gravitational
field, but planet Earth’s magnetic field is not strong enough to lift paper clips
against its own gravitational field.
Hence, the Earth’s magnetic field is indeed thousands of times weaker
than a bar magnet’s magnetic field.
The Earth’s magnetic field
reverses itself once every few hundred thousand years. We do not understand how or why this
occurs. We do know that it does happen
from the magnetization of iron within rocks.
The uppermost layer of rock has its iron magnetized in the same
direction of the Earth’s magnetic field; this is called normal polarity. However, a deeper layer of rock has its iron
magnetized in the opposite direction of the Earth’s magnetic field; this is
called reverse polarity. An even deeper
layer of rock has normal polarity again, and an even more deep layer of rock
has reverse polarity again. In other
words, the magnetization of iron within rock (the polarity) alternates from
normal to reverse and back again. The
reason for this is clear. When new rock
forms, the iron within that rock will become magnetized in whichever direction
the Earth’s magnetic field happens to point at the time of that rock’s
formation. The Earth’s magnetic field
must reverse itself periodically to cause the alternating polarity of rock
layers. Therefore, we are certain that
the Earth’s magnetic field reverses itself once every few hundred thousand
years, but again we do not understand how or why this occurs.
It is a common misconception
that the Earth’s magnetic field begins at the north pole and ends at the south
pole. This is false for a couple of
reasons. Firstly, it is a basic law of
physics that magnetic field lines are not permitted to begin or end anywhere;
magnetic field lines must form closed loops.
The magnetic field lines of a bar magnet, such as a refrigerator magnet
for example, do not begin at the north pole of the magnet, nor do they end at
the south pole of the magnet. The
magnetic field lines of a bar magnet go straight through the magnet, coming out
of its north pole, circulating around to go into its south pole, going straight
through the magnet, and coming out its north pole again. Similarly, the magnetic field lines of planet
Earth go straight through the planet, coming out one end, circulating around to
go into the opposite end, going straight through the planet, and coming out
again. Moreover, the Earth’s magnetic
field lines do not come out from nor do they go into the geographical
poles. The Earth’s magnetic field lines
come out from and go into the magnetic poles, which are different from the
geographical poles. Indeed, a magnetic
compass does not point toward geographical north as is commonly believed. A magnetic compass points toward magnetic
north, which again is different from geographical north. Admittedly, the Earth’s magnetic poles are
somewhat close to the planet’s geographical poles, but there is no reason to
expect that the magnetic poles should be the same or even close to the
geographical poles. The solid (inner)
core is literally floating within the molten (outer) core. Therefore, the solid (inner) core is actually
detached from the rest of the planet.
Consequently, there is no reason to expect that the solid (inner) core
is rotating in precisely the same direction as the rest of the planet. In addition, there are circulating currents
of molten metal within the molten (outer) core.
In brief, the rotation of the Earth is complicated; the entire planet
does not rotate together as one solid unit.
Therefore, there is no reason to expect that the magnetic poles should
be the same or even close to the geographical poles. To ask why the Earth’s magnetic poles are
different from the geographical poles is a wrong question to ask, since there
is no reason to expect that the magnetic poles should be the same as the
geographical poles. The correct question
to ask is why are the Earth’s magnetic poles even close to the Earth’s geographical
poles. We do not understand why this is
the case. Indeed, other planets have
magnetic poles that are completely different from their geographical poles.
The solar wind is a stream of
charged particles from the Sun composed primarily of protons and
electrons. This solar wind is capable of
substantially ionizing the Earth’s atmosphere in a fairly short amount of
time. Fortunately, the Earth’s magnetic
field, although weak compared with the magnetic field of bar magnets, is
sufficiently strong to deflect most of the Sun’s solar wind. Some of the charged particles in the solar
wind do however become trapped within the Earth’s magnetic field. These charged particles execute helical
trajectories around the Earth’s magnetic field lines. These regions of the Earth’s magnetic field
are called the Van Allen belts, named for the American physicist James Van
Allen who discovered these belts in the year 1958. The charged particles within the Van Allen
belts execute helical trajectories while drifting along the Earth’s magnetic
field lines toward the magnetic poles.
The charged particles eventually collide with the molecules of the
Earth’s atmosphere, surrendering their kinetic energy by emitting light. The result is gorgeous curtains of light or
sheets of light across the sky near the Earth’s magnetic poles. This is called an aurora. Near the Earth’s north magnetic pole it is
called aurora borealis (or more commonly the northern lights), and near the
Earth’s south magnetic pole it is called aurora australis
(or more commonly the southern lights).
If the Sun happens to be less active, its solar wind would be weaker,
the resulting aurorae would appear less spectacular, and we would only be able
to enjoy them near the Earth’s magnetic poles.
If the Sun happens to be more active, its solar wind would be stronger,
the resulting aurorae would appear more spectacular, and we would be able to
enjoy them further from the Earth’s magnetic poles. For example, the Battle of Fredericksburg in
December 1862 during the American Civil War was interrupted by the appearance
of the aurora borealis in the sky, even though Fredericksburg, Virginia is
quite far from the Earth’s north magnetic pole.
The interior of the geosphere
is hot due to geothermal energy. This
geothermal energy drives geologic activity, as we will discuss shortly. The source of this geothermal energy is
primarily radioactive decay. There are
certain atoms that have an unstable nucleus, since the nucleus has too much
energy. To stabilize itself, the nucleus
will emit particles to decrease its own energy.
These atoms are called radioactive atoms, and the emission of these
particles is called radioactive decay. A
certain naturally occurring fraction (percentage) of all the atoms in the
universe are radioactive. A certain
fraction (percentage) of the atoms that compose the geosphere are
radioactive. When these atoms suffer
from radioactive decay, the emitted particles are themselves a source of
energy. This is the source of the
Earth’s geothermal energy. A planet
larger than the Earth would have a longer geologic lifetime than the Earth,
since it would have more mass and therefore more radioactive atoms and hence a
greater supply of geothermal energy. A
planet smaller than the Earth would have a shorter geologic lifetime than the
Earth, since it would have less mass and therefore less radioactive atoms and
hence a smaller supply of geothermal energy.
Billions of years from now, most of the radioactive atoms of planet
Earth will have decayed. With very
little radioactive atoms remaining to provide geothermal energy, geologic
activity will end, and the Earth will become a geologically dead planet. This geological death has already occurred
for other planets smaller than the Earth.
The planets Mercury and Mars for example are geologically dead planets,
since they are significantly smaller than the Earth. However, planet Venus has almost the same
size as the Earth. Presumably, the
geologic lifetime of Venus is roughly the same as the geologic lifetime of the
Earth. Indeed, both Venus and the Earth
are currently geologically alive.
The three mechanisms by which
heat (energy) is transported from one location to another are conduction,
convection, and radiation. Conduction is
the transfer of heat (energy) from one object to another because they are in
direct contact with one another. For
example, our hand becomes hot when we grab a hot object because our hand is in
direct contact with the hot object when we grab it. The heat (energy) is transferred from the hot
object to our hand by conduction, since our hand is in direct contact with the
hot object. Convection is the transfer
of heat (energy) from one object to another by moving materials. It is commonly known that hot air rises and
cold air sinks. This is not just the
case for air; this is true for any gas and for any liquid as well. In physics, gases and liquids are called
fluids. Caution: in colloquial English,
the word fluid refers to liquids only, but in physics the word fluid refers to liquids
or gases. Convection is the transfer of
heat (energy) by moving fluids, since hot fluids rise and cool fluids
sink. For example, a heater on the first
floor of a house also warms the second floor by convection. The heater on the first floor warms the air
on the first floor; since hot fluids rise, the hot air rises to the second
floor and warms the second floor. When
the air that has risen to the second floor loses its heat and cools, it sinks
back to the first floor, where it is warmed again by the heater. Radiation is the transfer of heat (energy)
without direct contact and without moving fluids. Radiation typically transports heat (energy)
using electromagnetic waves. For
example, heat (energy) is not transported from the Sun to the Earth by
conduction, since the Earth is not in direct contact with the Sun, thank
God! Heat (energy) is not transported
from the Sun to the Earth by convection, since there is no fluid in outer space
that takes the Sun’s heat (energy) and moves it to the Earth. The Sun’s heat (energy) is transported to the
Earth across outer space by radiation, through electromagnetic waves.
The Theory of Plate Tectonics
Christopher Columbus
discovered America in the year 1492, more than five hundred years ago. Shortly thereafter, the Italian navigator Amerigo Vespucci further explored the American continents
and was the first to recognize that America was in fact a New World, and hence
this New World was named America in his honor.
Over the following decades, other navigators continued to explore the
American continents. As a result of all
of their achievements, the first maps of the entire world were eventually drawn
for the first time in human history. In
these world maps, cartographers noticed that the east coast of South America
has a similar shape to the west coast of Africa. Most cartographers believed that this was
only a coincidence, since the coastlines appeared to have similar shapes but
not precisely the same shape. The first
person to seriously investigate why these two coastlines share similar shapes
was the German meteorologist Alfred Wegener during the early twentieth
century. Although Wegener was not a
geologist, he discovered that the rocks on the east coast of South America and
the rocks on the west coast of Africa are similar to one another. He began to imagine that South America and
Africa were connected to each other in the distant past and have moved apart
from one another since that ancient time.
He also imagined that North America and Europe were connected to each
other in the distant past and have also moved apart from one another since that
ancient time. When Wegener connected
maps of North America and Europe to each other like a jigsaw puzzle, he noticed
that the Appalachian Mountains in North America connect with the Scandinavian
Mountains in Europe. Although Wegener
was not a geologist, he then discovered that the rocks that compose the
Appalachian Mountains are similar to the rocks that compose the Scandinavian
Mountains! Wegener then discovered that
South America and Africa were in the same cold climate in the distant past,
leading him to imagine that these continents were not only connected to each
other in the distant past but also further south where it is cold. If South America and Africa were connected to
each other and further south, Wegener imagined that North America and Europe
were not only connected to each other in the distant past but also further
south, perhaps near the equator where it is warm. Wegener then discovered that during the same
ancient cold climate in South America and Africa, North America and Europe were
indeed in the same warm climate!
Finally, Wegener discovered fossils of the same animals in South America
and Africa; these were fossils of land animals that could not swim across an
ocean. Putting all of these observations
together, Alfred Wegener proposed the hypothesis of continental drift in his
textbook The Origin of Continents and
Oceans, published in the year 1915.
According to his hypothesis, the continents were connected to one
another in the distant past and have drifted apart from one another since that
ancient time. Wegener’s hypothesis of
continental drift was rejected and ridiculed by the geological community at the
time. Today, we realize that some of
Alfred Wegener’s ideas were indeed incorrect.
For example, Wegener proposed that gravitational forces from the Moon
causes the continents to drift. Although
gravitational forces from the Moon (and the Sun) cause tides in the oceans as
we will discuss later in the course, these gravitational forces are not strong
enough to push continents. Wegener also
proposed that the continents cut through the rock at the ocean floor as they
drift. Today, we realize that this is
incorrect as well. Nevertheless, today
we do realize that Wegener’s basic idea that the continents are moving is in
fact correct. Alfred Wegener died in the
year 1930, shortly after his fiftieth birthday while on an expedition surveying
the enormous ice sheet that covers the microcontinent Greenland. If he had lived a few decades longer, he
would have lived to see that his hypothesis of continental drift was
essentially correct, although not entirely correct. In the late 1920s,
the British geologist Arthur Holmes proposed that convection within the mantle
may transfer thermal energy (heat) from the lower mantle deep within the
geosphere to the upper mantle near the surface of the geosphere. He also proposed that this thermal energy
could be transferred to the continents, pushing them as Alfred Wegener
envisioned. Unfortunately, it would take
a few decades before the ideas of Alfred Wegener and Arthur Holmes would be
combined to formulate the correct theory of the geology of planet Earth.
The Second World War occurred
from the year 1939 to the year 1945.
Before the Second World War, the United States maintained a small
standing army. Whenever the United
States needed to wage war, the federal government would assemble a massive army
that would fight and win the war. After
the war ended, the army was almost entirely disbanded. This occurred after the end of the American
Civil War and after the end of the First World War for example. However, the Axis Powers (Germany, Italy, and
Japan) almost succeeded in literal global domination during the Second World
War. Although the Axis Powers were
defeated, that threat was immediately replaced by another threat; the Union of
Soviet Socialist Republics (the U.S.S.R. or the Soviet Union) had used the
Second World War as an opportunity to conquer half of the entire world. After the United States defeated three
nations that almost succeeded in literal global domination and upon realizing
the new global threat that it faced, the political leadership of the United
States decided against disbanding its army, and the United States continues to
maintain a large standing army to the present day. Enormous amounts of funds have been invested
in the armed forces of the United States since the end of the Second World
War. As a result, the armed forces of
the United States have pioneered many branches of scientific research. In the context of this course, the United
States Navy founded the Office of Naval Research (ONR)
in the year 1946. The Office of Naval
Research (ONR) discovered the continental shelves,
which are the parts of the continents that are submerged under the ocean. The true shape of a continent is only
obtained when we include the continental shelves together with the rest of the
continent. When we include the
continental shelves, the east coast of South America in fact fits perfectly
into the west coast of Africa. This is
no longer a coincidence that we can simply ignore. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) also discovered oceanic ridges, which are mountain
ranges at the bottom of the ocean. In
particular, the Mid-Atlantic Ridge runs along the middle of the Atlantic Ocean
and itself has the same shape as the east coast of South America and the west
coast of Africa. This is also not a
coincidence that we can simply ignore. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) later discovered a continuum of rock ages at the
bottom of the ocean. The rocks that
compose oceanic ridges are youngest, and the rocks that compose the ocean basin
are progressively older and older further and further from the oceanic ridges,
closer and closer to continents. Indeed,
the rocks that compose the ocean basins nearest to continents are oldest. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) also discovered a continuum of sediment thickness at
the bottom of the ocean. The sediments
that cover the ocean floor are thinnest near the oceanic ridges, and the
sediments that cover the ocean floor are progressively thicker and thicker
further and further from the oceanic ridges, closer and closer to continents. Indeed, the sediments that cover the ocean
floor nearest to continents are thickest.
This continuum of sediment thickness is consistent with the continuum of
rock age. If rock is older, then there
has been more time for sediment to accumulate, and so the sediment must be
thicker; if rock is younger, then there has been less time for sediment to
accumulate, and so the sediment must be thinner. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) also mapped the global distribution of seismic
activity such as earthquakes and the global distribution of igneous activity
such as volcanic eruptions. These two
global distributions closely match each other.
Some locations on planet Earth have an abundance of both seismic and
igneous activity, while other locations on planet Earth have very little
seismic or igneous activity. Finally,
the Office of Naval Research (ONR) discovered
alternating magnetic polarities within rocks on the ocean floor. This alternating magnetic polarity is not
just vertically downward to deeper rock layers but also laterally
(horizontally) across neighboring rocks, providing the strongest evidence that
the ocean floor must be moving. All of
these observations led geologists to conclude that continents and ocean basins
slowly move over millions of years.
During the 1960s, American geophysicists Harry
Hammond Hess, Robert S. Dietz, and Robert R. Coats, British geophysicists
Drummond Matthews and Frederick Vine, Canadian geophysicists Lawrence Morley
and John Tuzo Wilson, American geophysicist W. Jason
Morgan, British geophysicists Dan P. McKenzie and Robert L. Parker, French
geophysicist Xavier Le Pichon, and American
geophysicists Jack Oliver, Bryan Isacks, and Lynn R.
Sykes, together formulated the fundamental theory of the geology of planet
Earth: the Theory of Plate Tectonics.
Whereas Alfred Wegener and Arthur Holmes were the grandfathers of this
theory, these fourteen geophysicists were the true fathers of the Theory of
Plate Tectonics.
According to the Theory of
Plate Tectonics, the lithosphere is fractured (or broken) into roughly twenty
pieces called tectonic plates. The
adjective tectonic is derived from a Greek word meaning construction or
building. In other words, the Theory of
Plate Tectonics states that the lithosphere is composed of (built from or
constructed from) pieces. These tectonic
plates are floating on the asthenosphere and are being pushed very slowly by
convection cells in the asthenosphere.
Mostly solid but nevertheless weak rock in the lower layers of the
asthenosphere are heated by the Earth’s geothermal energy. Since hot fluids rise, this hot rock rises
until it reaches a tectonic plate of the lithosphere. The risen rock then pushes the tectonic plate
in a certain direction, since the thermal energy (heat energy) of the rock is
transformed into the kinetic energy (moving energy) of the tectonic plate. Since the tectonic plate gains kinetic energy
at the expense of the thermal energy of the rock, the rock must become cooler
as it pushes the tectonic plate. Since
cool fluids sink, the now cooler rock sinks back into the asthenosphere, where
it is warmed again by the Earth’s geothermal energy. In brief, there are circulating currents of
weak rock within the asthenosphere.
These are called convection cells.
These convection cells push the tectonic plates very slowly, a few
centimeters per year on average.
According to the Theory of Plate Tectonics, much geologic activity
occurs at the boundary between two tectonic plates. There are three different types of tectonic
plate boundaries: divergent plate boundaries, convergent plate boundaries, and
transform fault boundaries.
At a divergent plate
boundary, two tectonic plates are being pushed away from each other. The verb to diverge means to spread out. As the tectonic plates are pushed away from
each other, hot rock within the asthenosphere can rise and deposit itself onto
the tectonic plates. As the rock cools,
it may crystallize into solid igneous rock.
Hence, this is the youngest part of a tectonic plate, since newborn rock
forms at divergent plate boundaries.
Entire mountain ranges can be built at divergent plate boundaries. For example, the Mid-Atlantic Ridge runs
along the middle of the Atlantic Ocean and assumes the same shape as the east
coast of South America and the west coast of Africa. The South American continent is actually a
part of a much larger tectonic plate called the South American plate, and the
African continent is actually a part of a much larger tectonic plate called the
African plate. The South American plate
and the African plate are being pushed away from each other, permitting hot
rock to rise out of the asthenosphere.
The hot rock has deposited onto both plates, has cooled, and has
crystallized to form the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
This is why the shape of the east coast of South America, the west coast
of Africa, and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between them are all similar to each
other. South America and Africa were
connected to each other roughly two hundred million years ago, but they have
been pushed apart from one another, thus forming the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at the
boundary between these two tectonic plates.
North America and Europe were also connected to each other roughly two
hundred million years ago, and they are also being pushed apart from one
another. The Atlantic Ocean is
continuously becoming wider very slowly, only a few centimeters per year. The Red Sea between the Arabian peninsula and
northeastern Africa is the result of another divergent plate boundary. The Arabian peninsula was ripped off of the
continent of Africa millions of years ago, opening up the Red Sea. The African continent is still being ripped
apart in southeastern Africa, forming the African Rift Valleys. If we wait millions of years, the African
Rift Valleys will rip open to become a narrow sea like the Red Sea. If we wait millions of more years, that
narrow sea will open even wider to become a growing ocean like the Atlantic
Ocean.
At a convergent plate
boundary, two tectonic plates are being pushed toward each other. The verb to converge means to come
together. As the tectonic plates are
pushed toward each other, they eventually collide. The more dense tectonic plate will sink into
the asthenosphere, while the less dense tectonic plate will rise out of the
asthenosphere. Hence, the more dense
plate will sink underneath the less dense plate. As the more dense tectonic plate sinks into
the asthenosphere, it is heated by the Earth’s geothermal energy. Eventually, the plate becomes sufficiently
hot that it melts. Hence, this is the
oldest part of a tectonic plate, since the tectonic plate is being destroyed as
it melts into molten rock. Liquids are
usually less dense than solids. Hence,
this less dense molten rock may rise and collide underneath the other tectonic
plate; the molten rock may even push through the other tectonic plate, forming
active volcanoes. For example, the Nazca
plate at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean and the South American plate are being
pushed toward each other. The Nazca
plate is more dense, since it is an oceanic plate composed primarily of mafic
igneous rock. The South American plate
is less dense, since it is a continental plate composed primarily of felsic
igneous rock. Thus, the Nazca plate is
sinking underneath the South American plate.
As the Nazca plate sinks, it is heated by the Earth’s geothermal
energy. The Nazca plate melts, and the
less dense molten rock rises. The molten
rock collides underneath and even pushes through the South American plate,
forming the Andes Mountains on the west coast of South America. Indeed, many of the mountains in the Andes
are volcanically active. The Nazca plate
is an example of an oceanic plate, since it is at the bottom of the Pacific
Ocean. The South American plate is an
example of a continental plate, since it is mostly the South American
continent. Hence, the Andes Mountains
have formed at an oceanic-continental convergent plate boundary. It is always the oceanic plate that sinks
underneath the continental plate at an oceanic-continental convergent plate
boundary, since oceanic plates are composed primarily of more dense mafic
igneous rock and continental plates are composed primarily of less dense felsic
igneous rock. These oceanic-continental
convergent plate boundaries form continental volcanic arcs, such as the Andes
Mountains. At an oceanic-oceanic
convergent plate boundary, two oceanic plates collide. Again, the more dense plate will sink
underneath the less dense plate. The
more dense plate is heated and melts.
The molten rock rises and collides underneath and may even push through
the other tectonic plate, again forming active volcanoes. These are volcanic island arcs, such as the
Aleutian Islands in Alaska or the Japanese Islands or the Philippine Islands. A subduction zone is wherever one tectonic
plate sinks underneath another tectonic plate.
There are two different types of subduction zones: oceanic-continental
convergence forming continental volcanic arcs such as the Andes Mountains and
oceanic-oceanic convergence forming volcanic island arcs such as the Aleutian
Islands, the Japanese Islands, or the Philippine Islands. However, continental-continental convergence
does not result in a subduction zone, since continental plates are too thick to
permit one plate to sink underneath the other plate. If two continental plates collide and if the
convection cells in the asthenosphere continue to push them toward each other,
the rock of both plates becomes folded.
If we apply a large force to rock in a short duration of time, we will
fault (break) the rock. However, if we
apply a small force to rock over a long duration of time, we will bend or
deform or warp the rock. The technical
term for this bending or deforming or warping is folding. If we apply a small force to rock over a long
duration of time, we will fold the rock.
Hence, two colliding continental plates become folded. The rocks are folded upward forming
non-volcanic mountains, since there is no subduction. The technical term for these non-volcanic
mountains is fold mountains. For
example, millions of years ago the Indian plate was near the South Pole. The Indian plate was pushed northward and
closed up an ancient ocean that no longer exists. The Indian plate eventually collided with the
Eurasian plate. As the plates continue to
be pushed toward each other, they have folded upward forming the Himalayas, the
tallest mountains in the world. The
Himalayas continue to grow taller, although very slowly, as the Indian plate
and the Eurasian plate continue to be pushed toward each other. Mount Everest is in the Himalayas, is the
tallest mountain in the world, and is still growing taller, although only a few
centimeters per year. The Appalachian
Mountains are another example of fold mountains. Two hundred million years ago, the North
American plate and the Eurasian plate collided and folded upward, forming the
Appalachian Mountains. The Appalachian
Mountains were the tallest mountains in the world roughly two hundred million
years ago. However, over the past two
hundred million years, the North American plate and the Eurasian plate have
diverged from one another, and thus the Appalachian Mountains are no longer
growing taller. In fact, the Appalachian
Mountains are continuously becoming shorter as natural forces such as wind and
rain degrade (weaken and destroy) their rocks, ultimately breaking them down
into sediment and moving the sediment to other landscapes. The Ural Mountains are also fold
mountains. Hundreds of millions of years
ago, Europe and Asia were two separate continents. They collided, forming the Ural
Mountains. For hundreds of years, humans
believed that the Ural Mountains were an arbitrary geographical boundary
between Europe and Asia. The Theory of
Plate Tectonics has revealed that the Ural Mountains are not an arbitrary
geographical boundary between Europe and Asia.
The Theory of Plate Tectonics has revealed that the Ural Mountains are
the actual geological boundary between Europe and Asia! In summary, there are three different types
of convergent plate boundaries: oceanic-continental convergence,
oceanic-oceanic convergence, and continental-continental convergence. At oceanic-continental convergence, we have
continental volcanic arcs such as the Andes Mountains. At oceanic-oceanic convergence, we have volcanic
island arcs such as the Aleutian Islands, the Japanese Islands, and the
Philippine Islands. These two cases are
subduction zones. However, at
continental-continental convergence, we do not have subduction; we have fold
mountains such as the Himalayas, the Appalachians, or the Urals.
The Wilson cycle describes
the evolution (the birth, growth, decline, and death) of ocean basins, named
for the Canadian geophysicist John Tuzo Wilson, one
of the fathers of the Theory of Plate Tectonics. According to the Wilson cycle, we begin with
no ocean basin at a continental rift valley, such as the African Rift
Valleys. After millions of years, the
continental rift valley will rip open to form a narrow widening sea, such as the
Red Sea. After millions of more years,
the narrow sea will gradually widen to form a growing ocean, such as the
Atlantic Ocean. After millions of more
years, the margins of that ocean basin may begin to subduct
beneath other tectonic plates. The
result is a dying ocean, such as the Pacific Ocean. Although the Pacific Ocean is much larger
than the Atlantic Ocean, the Pacific Ocean is a dying ocean that is gradually
closing up. After millions of more
years, the ocean basin has closed up so much that it is now a narrow closing
sea, such as the Mediterranean Sea.
Finally, that narrow sea will close entirely forming fold mountains,
such as the Himalayas, the Appalachians, or the Urals. In millions of years, fold mountains will
form when Africa collides with Europe thus closing up the Mediterranean
Sea. Geologists have given these future
mountains a name even though they have not yet been born; they are called the
Mediterranean Mountains. The rock around
the Mediterranean Sea has already started folding, forming the Atlas Mountains
in Africa and the Alps in Europe.
At a transform fault
boundary, two tectonic plates slide across each other. Tectonic plates are not smooth, since they
are composed of rock. Hence, the sliding
of the tectonic plates across each other causes seismic activity, such as weak
vibrations. On occasion, the two
tectonic plates become stuck, but the convection cells in the asthenosphere
continue to try to push the plates across each other. It may take years or even decades, but
eventually the plates become unstuck and slide across each other by a
tremendous amount, perhaps several meters.
An enormous amount of energy is liberated from years or even decades of
accumulated stored energy within the rock, thus causing intense vibrations. This powerful type of seismic activity is
called an earthquake. For example, the
San Andreas Fault is the boundary between the North American plate and the
Pacific plate. The North American plate
is being pushed south, while the Pacific plate is being pushed north. The sliding of these two tectonic plates
across each other causes seismic activity, including earthquakes. This explains why there is an abundance of
seismic activity, including earthquakes, in California, since it is on the west
coast of North America at the boundary between the North American plate and the
Pacific plate. This also explains why
the shape of Baja California fits into the shape of Mexico. Millions of years ago, Baja California was connected
to Mexico. As these two tectonic plates
were pushed in two opposite directions, Baja California was ripped off of the
Mexican mainland, opening up the Sea of Cortez.
If we wait millions of years, all of Baja California together with upper
California (the State of California) will be ripped off of the North American
mainland forming an enormous island off the west coast of North America. Geologists have given this future island a
name even though it has not yet been born; it is called the Island of
California. The Island of California
will then continue to move north as the Pacific plate continues to be pushed
north.
Most geologic activity occurs
at ocean basins (at the bottom of the ocean), simply because most of the world
is covered with ocean. For example, most
seismic activity such as earthquakes occurs at the bottom of the ocean. Most igneous activity such as volcanic
eruptions occurs at the bottom of the ocean.
Most mountains are at the bottom of the ocean. Even most landslides occur at the bottom of
the ocean. The San Andreas Fault is
actually an example of a continental-continental transform fault boundary. The Queen Charlotte Fault off the west coast
of Canada is an example of an oceanic-oceanic transform fault boundary that
causes earthquakes at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean and near the west coast
of Canada. Just as it is popularly known
among many Americans that the San Andreas Fault continually causes earthquakes
near their west coast, it is popularly known among many Canadians that the
Queen Charlotte Fault continually causes earthquakes near their west coast.
According to the Theory of
Plate Tectonics, geologic activity does not just occur at plate
boundaries. Geologic activity also
occurs at hotspots, which are caused by mantle plumes. A mantle plume is a rising mass of hot rock
within the asthenosphere. The rising
mantle plume eventually collides underneath a tectonic plate. This collision can occur anywhere underneath
the tectonic plate depending on the location of the mantle plume. The collision need not be located at a plate
boundary; the collision could even occur in the middle of a tectonic
plate. After the collision, the hot rock
may push through the tectonic plate, causing geologic activity at this location
on the tectonic plate. This is called a
hotspot. For example, there is volcanic activity
in the Hawaiian Islands, but the Hawaiian Islands are nowhere near a plate
boundary; the Hawaiian Islands are in the middle of the Pacific plate. The volcanic activity in the Hawaiian Islands
is caused by a hotspot, which is itself caused by a mantle plume. Molten rock pushes out of the Pacific plate
at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. The
extruding molten rock builds a volcano at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. More extruding molten rock grows the volcano
taller and taller until it protrudes out of the Pacific Ocean. It is now a volcanic island. We all learn in primary (elementary) school
that Mount Everest in the Himalayas is the tallest mountain in the world. Actually, if we measure the height of the
Hawaiian Islands above their true base, which is at the bottom of the Pacific
Ocean, then the Hawaiian Islands are in fact the tallest mountains in the
world. As measured from their true base
at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean, the Hawaiian Islands are much taller than
Mount Everest. It is however strictly
correct to state that Mount Everest has the highest elevation above sea level.
The rocks that compose the
westernmost Hawaiian island are oldest, while the rocks that compose the
Hawaiian Islands further and further east are younger and younger. The rocks that compose the easternmost
Hawaiian island (the main Hawaiian island) are youngest, and that is the only
Hawaiian island with active volcanism.
All the other volcanoes on all the other Hawaiian Islands are
extinct. This suggests that the hotspot
is moving east, but in actuality the Pacific plate is moving west over the
hotspot. As the Pacific plate moves
west, the hotspot pushes up a Hawaiian island with active volcanism. As the Pacific plate continues to move west,
that Hawaiian island moves west and off of the hotspot causing its volcanoes to
become extinct, while the hotspot pushes up a new Hawaiian island with active
volcanism. As the Pacific plate
continues to move west, that Hawaiian island moves west and off of the hotspot
causing its volcanoes to become extinct, while the hotspot pushes up a new
Hawaiian island, and so on and so forth.
If we wait millions of years, the main Hawaiian island will move off of
the hotspot, its volcanoes will become extinct, and the hotspot will push up a
new Hawaiian island to the east of the easternmost (main) Hawaiian island. This is already beginning to occur. To the east of the easternmost (main)
Hawaiian island, there is a small active volcano at the bottom of the Pacific
Ocean. If we wait millions of years,
that active volcano will grow to become the new Hawaiian island.
Although the Hawaiian Islands
are volcanic islands, we cannot classify the Hawaiian Islands as a volcanic
island arc, since we must reserve that term for volcanic islands that are
caused by subduction, such as the Aleutian Islands, the Japanese Islands, or
the Philippine Islands. The Hawaiian
Islands are not caused by subduction; the Hawaiian Islands are caused by a
hotspot, which is itself caused by a mantle plume. Geologists use the term nematath
to describe volcanic islands caused by a hotspot caused by a mantle plume. The word nematath
literally means string/trail/chain of
dung/excrement/defecation/feces/turds.
The vulgar word for dung/excrement/defecation/feces/turds is sh!#$&*t. Just
as a string/trail/chain of dung/excrement/defecation/feces/turds, vulgarly
known as sh!#$&*t, left by geese reveals in which
direction the geese have walked, a nematath such as
the Hawaiian Islands reveals in which direction a tectonic plate is
moving. We can even calculate the speed
of the tectonic plate from the spacing of the islands of the nematath and the ages of the rocks that compose the islands
of the nematath.
This is why geologists use the term nematath
for volcanic islands caused by a hotspot caused by a mantle plume, since such
volcanic islands is rather like a string/trail/chain of
dung/excrement/defecation/feces/turds, vulgarly known as sh!#$&*t.
Imagine a globe that depicts
the shapes of the continents and the oceans. The Theory of Plate Tectonics has revealed
that the Earth has never looked this way before and that the Earth will never
look this way again. If the tectonic
plates are slowly but continuously being pushed by convection cells in the
asthenosphere, then the shapes of the continents and the oceans are slowly but
continuously changing. We do not notice
this occurring, but we would notice significant changes if we wait millions of
years. During some eras of Earth’s
history, the continents may have been more uniformly (evenly) distributed
around the planet. During other eras in
Earth’s history, the continents may have all been together as one giant
landmass called a supercontinent. A
supercontinent is surrounded by a superocean, the
unity of all the oceans around the supercontinent. According to the supercontinent cycle, once
every roughly five hundred million years, all the continents are together as a
supercontinent surrounded by a superocean. If planet Earth is roughly 4.5 billion years
old and if there is a supercontinent every roughly five hundred million years,
this means that there have been roughly nine or ten supercontinents thus far in
Earth’s history. In roughly five billion
years, the Sun will swell to become a red giant, thus destroying all four of
the inner planets, including the Earth.
If the Earth will be destroyed in roughly five billion years and if
there is a supercontinent every roughly five hundred million years, then there
will be roughly ten supercontinents in the Earth’s future. Therefore, over the entire history of planet
Earth, there have been and there will be very roughly twenty
supercontinents. Many students believe
that we happen to be alive when the continents are uniformly (evenly) distributed
around the planet, but this is not the case.
The continents are presently crowded together on the opposite side of
planet Earth from the Pacific Ocean, which is by far the largest ocean in the
entire world. The continents are also
presently more crowded toward the northern hemisphere as compared with the
southern hemisphere. Therefore, we
happen to be alive not when the continents are more uniformly (evenly)
distributed; we happen to be alive when the continents are rather crowded
together. This is because rather
recently, roughly two hundred million years ago, all the continents were
together in one giant supercontinent called Pangaea surrounded by a superocean called Panthalassa. It is a common misconception that when the
Earth formed, the continents were all together as Pangaea and have been
spreading apart ever since. This is
false. Again, there have been roughly
ten supercontinents in Earth’s history thus far, and there will be another
roughly ten supercontinents in the Earth’s future. Not only was Pangaea not the first supercontinent
in Earth’s history, Pangaea was in fact the most recent supercontinent in
Earth’s history. There were several
other supercontinents before Pangea ever formed, and there will be several
other supercontinents in the Earth’s future.
The Theory of Plate Tectonics
has explained seismic activity, such as earthquakes in California. The Theory of Plate Tectonics has explained subductive igneous activity, such as the volcanic activity
in the Andes Mountains, the Aleutian Islands, the Japanese Islands, and the
Philippine Islands. The Theory of Plate
Tectonics has explained the formation of non-volcanic mountains, such as the
Himalayas, the Appalachians, and the Urals.
The Theory of Plate Tectonics has explained why the continents fit
together like a jigsaw puzzle, such as the east coast of South America fitting
into the west coast of Africa and the Arabian peninsula fitting into
northeastern Africa and Baja California fitting into Mexico. The Theory of Plate Tectonics has even
explained the igneous activity of the Hawaiian Islands. The Theory of Plate Tectonics is truly the
fundamental theory of the geology of planet Earth. Caution: the Theory of Plate Tectonics has
not explained all geologic phenomena on planet Earth; there are still many
examples of geologic activity that geologists do not completely
understand. Nevertheless, whenever a
geologist tries to understand any geologic activity on planet Earth, the
geologist does so within the context of the Theory of Plate Tectonics.
During eras of Earth’s
history when there was a supercontinent at the equator, the climate of the
entire planet would be warm, since the equator is warm throughout the entire
year. During other eras of Earth’s
history when there were continents and/or microcontinents that were relatively
isolated at one or both poles, the climate of the entire planet would be cold,
since the poles are cold throughout the entire year. An ice age is a long period of time, lasting
millions of years, when the climate of the entire planet is cold. There have been a few ice ages throughout
Earth’s history thus far. It is truly
remarkable how we have just applied the Theory of Plate Tectonics to
climatology. The Theory of Plate
Tectonics is the fundamental theory of the Earth’s geology, the study of the
geosphere (the solid part of the Earth).
We might suspect that this theory therefore has nothing to do with
meteorology and climatology, which are the study of the Earth’s atmosphere. However, we have just applied the Theory of
Plate Tectonics to explain ice ages, a climatological phenomenon. Therefore, the Theory of Plate Tectonics is
not just the fundamental theory of geology of planet Earth; the Theory of Plate
Tectonics is one of the fundamental theories of all the Earth Sciences.
Evidence for the Theory of
Plate Tectonics includes the matching shapes of different continents, similar
rocks on different continents, matching mountain ranges on different
continents, similar ancient climates on different continents, fossils of the
same land animal on different continents, the continuum of rocks ages of
ocean-basin rocks, the continuum of sediment thickness on the ocean basins, the
magnetic reversals within ocean-basin rocks, seismic activity, and igneous
activity. There is also astronomical
evidence for the Theory of Plate Tectonics.
Quasars are the most distant galaxies in the universe from us. These quasars are so distant that they should
not appear to move. However,
astronomical observations of quasars using ground-based telescopes reveal that
they do appear to move slowly over periods of several years. We must conclude that it is not the quasars
that are moving; in fact, it is the telescope that is itself moving in the
opposite direction. Since the
ground-based telescope is upon a continent which is itself a part of a tectonic
plate, the apparent motion of quasars reveals that the lithosphere is indeed
fractured (broken) into tectonic plates that are all moving in various
directions. We can even use the apparent
motion of quasars to measure the actual motion of tectonic plates. Furthermore, the global positioning system
(GPS) is further evidence of the Theory of Plate Tectonics. The global positioning system (GPS) is a
collection of many artificial satellites that humans have placed in orbit
around the Earth that accurately measure the motion of ground-based receivers,
such as mobile telephones for example.
However, the global positioning system (GPS) has measured the motion of
apparently stationary ground-based receivers.
Once again, these apparently stationary ground-based receivers are upon
continents which are themselves part of tectonic plates. Hence, the global positioning system (GPS)
has further revealed that the lithosphere of the Earth is fractured (broken)
into tectonic plates that are all moving in various directions. Before the global positioning system (GPS),
we were only able to measure the relative motions of tectonic plates, the
motions of tectonic plates relative to one another. Using the global positioning system (GPS), we
are now able to measure the absolute motions of tectonic plates, the motions of
tectonic plates relative to the center of the Earth.
Although the Theory of Plate
Tectonics is the fundamental theory of the geology of planet Earth, the Theory
of Plate Tectonics is not a universal law of geology. In other words, the Theory of Plate Tectonics
does not apply to every metallic-rocky planet in the universe. The Theory of Plate Tectonics does not even
apply to every metallic-rocky planet in our Solar System. In particular, the Theory of Plate Tectonics
is not the correct theory to explain the geologic activity on planet
Venus. Geophysicists continue to search
for the correct theory of the geology of planet Venus.
Orology
Orology is the study of mountains,
and an orologist is someone who studies
mountains. These words are derived from
the Greek root oro- for mountain. A collection of a few mountains is called a
mountain massif. A collection of a few
mountain massifs, which is therefore a large number of mountains, is called a
mountain range. A collection of a few
mountain ranges, which is therefore a large number of mountain massifs and thus
an enormous number of mountains, is called a cordillera. Orography is the classification of mountains,
the study of different types of mountains.
Orogenesis is the study of how mountains
form. Again, these words are derived
from the Greek root oro- for mountain. In order to discuss orogenesis
(the formation of mountains), we must make a distinction between ductile
deformation and brittle deformation. If
we apply a large force to a rock in a short duration of time, we will break the
rock. This is brittle deformation, and
the technical term for a break within rock resulting from brittle deformation
is a fault. If we apply a small force to
a rock over a long duration of time, we will bend or deform or warp the
rock. This is ductile deformation, and
the technical term for the bending or deforming or warping of rock due to
ductile deformation is a fold. In brief,
ductile deformation causes folds, while brittle deformation causes faults.
Small forces over long
periods of time result in folded rock through ductile deformation. Some parts of rock will be folded upward,
while other parts of the rock will be folded downward. Rocks that are folded upward are called
anticlines, which grow larger to become domes, which eventually over millions
of years grow to become fold mountains.
The rocks that are folded downward are called synclines, which grow
larger to become basins, which eventually over millions of years grow to become
valleys between fold mountains. Since
they do not form from subduction, fold mountains are non-volcanic cordilleras. Examples of fold mountains include the
Himalayas, the Appalachians, and the Urals.
The Atlas Mountains, the Alps, and the Caucasus Mountains are also fold
mountains in the process of formation.
Large forces over short
periods of time result in faulted rock through brittle deformation. Vertical faults are called dip-slip faults,
while horizontal faults are called strike-slip faults. Note that dip-slip faults need not be
perfectly vertical. A fault that is
slanted in elevation would still be classified as a dip-slip fault. Caution: most faults are small breaks within
a tectonic plate. Some faults are
between different tectonic plates, but these are the largest faults in the
entire world. The largest dip-slip
faults in the world are called thrust faults, which is simply another term for
subduction zones. The largest strike-slip
faults in the world are called transform faults. We need vertical motion to create mountains
and valleys. Therefore, strike-slip
faults do not form mountains and valleys; only dip-slip faults form mountains
and valleys. With a dip-slip fault, some
parts of the rock will be faulted upward, while other parts of the rock will be
faulted downward. Rocks that are faulted
upward are called horsts, which eventually grow to become fault mountains. Rocks that are faulted downward are called grabens, which eventually grow to become rift valleys
between fault mountains. The steep cliff
between a fault mountain and a rift valley is called a fault scarp. The African Rift Valleys in southeastern
Africa is an example of fault mountains and rift valleys. Thrust faults (subduction zones) create
volcanic arcs, either continental volcanic arcs such as the Andes Mountains or
volcanic island arcs such as the Aleutian Islands, the Japanese Islands, and
the Philippine Islands.
Most mountains are at the
bottom of the ocean, simply because most of the world is covered with
ocean. Some oceanic mountains are
volcanic island arcs that form from oceanic-oceanic subduction, such as the
Aleutian Islands, the Japanese Islands, and the Philippine Islands. Other oceanic mountains are nemataths that form from hotspots caused by mantle plumes,
such as the Hawaiian Islands. Still
other oceanic mountains are oceanic ridges that form from oceanic-oceanic
divergent plate boundaries, such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
We have discussed the
formation of the Himalayas, the Appalachians, the Urals, the Atlas Mountains,
the Alps, the Caucasus Mountains, the African Rift Valleys, the Andes
Mountains, the Aleutian Islands, the Japanese Islands, the Philippine Islands,
the Hawaiian Islands, and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. However, there is one cordillera we have yet
to discuss: the Rocky Mountains. We have
avoided a discussion of these mountains because orologists
continue to debate how they formed. The
most popular theory to explain the formation of the Rocky Mountains is the
subduction of an oceanic plate underneath the western margin of the North
American plate. This theoretical oceanic
plate is called the Juan de Fuca plate.
One argument in favor of this theory is the three parallel mountain
ranges near the west coast of North America: the Rocky Mountains, the Cascade
Range further west, and the Pacific Coastal Range furthest west directly along
the west coast of the North American continent.
As an oceanic plate subducts underneath a continental
plate, some of the rock that composes the subducting
plate is heated and melts into molten rock.
This molten rock rises and pushes its way through the margin of the
overlying continental plate, forming a mountain range. As the oceanic plate continues to subduct deeper within the Earth, the hotter temperatures
melt more of its rock. This molten rock
rises and pushes its way through the overlying continental plate, forming
another mountain range parallel to the first mountain range but toward the interior
of the continent. As this process
continues, the result is mountain ranges on the continent that are parallel to
one another and parallel to the coastline where the oceanic plate is subducting. The same
is true with the formation of the Andes Mountains near the west coast of South
America. As we discussed, the Nazca
plate is currently subducting underneath the western
margin of the South American plate, forming the Andes Mountains. In actuality, the Andes Mountains are a
collection of three parallel mountain ranges: Cordillera Oriental furthest
east, Cordillera Occidental to the west, and the Chilean Coastal Range furthest
west directly along the west coast of the South American continent.
Further evidence that the
Rocky Mountains, the Cascade Range, and the Pacific Coastal Range formed from
the subduction of the Juan de Fuca plate underneath the North American plate is
the accretionary wedge along the west coast of North America. When an oceanic plate subducts
underneath a continental plate, the continental plate rips islands,
microcontinents, and entire island arcs off of the subducting
oceanic plate. These pieces stick to the
continental plate, causing the continent to grow larger and larger as the
oceanic plate subducts beneath it. This edge of the continent, which is an
amalgamation of islands, microcontinents, and island arcs that were ripped off
of a subducting oceanic plate, is called an
accretionary wedge, since accretion is the gaining of mass through sticky
collisions. Each piece of an
accretionary wedge has its own unique geology, different from the geology of
neighboring parts of the accretionary wedge.
Each of these parts of an accretionary wedge with its own unique geology
is called a terrane. Caution: the common
English word terrain is spelled differently.
The common English word terrain simply means a description of the
topography of a landscape, commonly known as the lay of the land. The western margin of North America is indeed
an accretionary wedge, since it is a collection of terranes, each with its own
unique geology, different from the geology of even neighboring terranes.
When the Earth first formed,
there were probably small accumulations of felsic igneous rock distributed
somewhat uniformly (evenly) throughout the lithosphere. These were the first microcontinents. As these microcontinents were pushed by
convection cells in the asthenosphere, some of them collided with each other to
form larger masses of felsic igneous rock: small-sized continents. These small-sized continents grew even larger
as oceanic plates subducted underneath them, since
the continents ripped pieces off of these oceanic plates as they subducted. Hence,
the small-sized continents grew larger by gaining accretionary wedges,
eventually becoming medium-sized and even large-sized continents. Therefore, the deep center of a modern-day
continent was originally an ancient microcontinent from when the Earth was much
younger. Indeed, the oldest rocks in the
entire world are found within the deep centers of modern-day continents. The ancient deep center of a modern-day
continent is called the craton of the continent, originally an ancient
microcontinent that first formed billions of years ago when the Earth was young. As we will discuss shortly, these cratons are
composed of batholiths, enormous masses of intrusive/plutonic felsic igneous
rock.
If a tectonic plate becomes
heavier, it will sink into the asthenosphere.
If a tectonic plate becomes lighter, it will rise out of the
asthenosphere. This vertical motion of a
tectonic plate is called isostasy. For
example, during the glacial period of an ice age, water that evaporates from
the oceans will form enormous ice sheets upon continents. This extra weight will push the continental
plates downward into the asthenosphere.
As another example of isostasy, at the end of a glacial period of an ice
age, the enormous ice sheets upon continents will melt into liquid water that
returns to the oceans. This removed
weight permits the continental plates to rise out of the asthenosphere. As yet another example of isostasy, natural
forces degrade (weaken and destroy) mountains, breaking their rocks into
sediment. These same natural forces move
this sediment to other locations. Thus,
weight is removed from the mountains, causing that particular part of the
continental plate to become lighter.
Hence, it will rise out of the asthenosphere. In other words, as mountains become shorter,
they are buoyed upward to become taller!
The isostatic upward motion of a continental plate is comparable to the
shortening of mountains by degradation.
Hence, the actual elevation of mountaintops above sea level only changes
by small amounts as they are degraded by natural forces, since the shortened
mountain is compensated by the isostatic rising of the continental plate. A similar compensation occurs with
climatological effects upon sea level.
As we will discuss later in the course, we may naďvely predict sea level
to drop during the glacial period of an ice age, since water that has
evaporated from the oceans will form enormous ice sheets upon continents
instead of returning to the ocean through rivers. However, these enormous ice sheets also push
the continental plates into the asthenosphere, and hence we would predict that
sea level should rise relative to the sinking continents during the glacial
period of an ice age! The dropping sea
level from subtracted water is compensated by the rising sea level relative to
the isostatic sinking of the continental plates. Hence, the actual change in sea level is
small. As we will also discuss later in
the course, we may naďvely predict sea level to rise at the end of a glacial
period of an ice age, since enormous ice sheets will now melt into liquid water
that will return to the oceans through rivers.
However, this removed weight permits the continental plates to rise out
of the asthenosphere, and hence we would predict that sea level should drop
relative to the rising continents at the end of a glacial period of an ice
age! The rising sea level from added
water is compensated by the dropping sea level relative to the isostatic rising
of the continental plates. Again, the
actual change in sea level is small.
Seismology
Seismology is the study of
vibrations within the geosphere, and a seismologist is someone who studies
vibrations within the geosphere. These
words are derived from the Greek root seismo- for
shake. Any vibration in the geosphere is
called seismic activity, and earthquakes are the most powerful form of seismic
activity. Although seismic activity can
occur anywhere in the world, seismic activity is most clearly understood at
transform fault boundaries. At a
transform fault boundary, tectonic plates are pushed across each other. This slow, continuous motion of two tectonic
plates across each other at a transform fault boundary is called fault
creep. Since tectonic plates are
composed of rock, they are not smooth.
Hence, fault creep results in frequent weak vibrations. On occasion, the tectonic plates may become
stuck, but the convection cells within the asthenosphere continue to try to
push the tectonic plates across each other.
When there is active fault creep, the thermal energy (heat energy) of
the rock within the asthenosphere is being transformed into the kinetic energy
(moving energy) of the tectonic plates, as we discussed. If there is not active creep, the tectonic
plates do not have kinetic energy (moving energy). Thus, the thermal energy (heat energy) of the
rock in the asthenosphere must be transformed instead into elastic potential
energy. Potential energy is any form of
stored energy, and elastic potential energy is compressional stored
energy. In other words, if there is not
active creep, the rock must be suffering from compression over many years, perhaps
many decades. Eventually the rock
rebounds to its original shape, releasing the stored energy accumulated over
years or even decades. The result is
intense vibrations, an earthquake. In
other words, the mechanism by which an earthquake occurs is the elastic rebound
of compressed rock to its original shape, liberating the potential (stored)
energy. Note that all solids have
elastic properties. Just as stretching
an elastic band stores energy in the elastic band which can be liberated by
relaxing the elastic band, a rock or a table or a chair or a mobile telephone
can store energy by being compressed, and that stored energy can be liberated
by alleviating the applied pressure, thus causing the solid object to
elastically rebound to its original shape.
If there is no active fault creep at a transform fault boundary, all the
transferred thermal energy of the rock within the asthenosphere is being
transformed into elastic potential energy, thus compressing the rock. This stored energy is eventually liberated,
and hence a powerful earthquake more likely to occur where there is no active
fault creep. If there is active fault
creep at a transform fault boundary, a significant fraction of the thermal
energy of the rock within the asthenosphere is being transformed into kinetic
energy, thus moving the tectonic plates.
Hence, less energy is stored as elastic potential energy, making a
powerful earthquake less likely to occur where there is active fault creep. In summary, a powerful earthquake is less likely
to occur at a transform fault boundary where there is active creep, but a
powerful earthquake is more likely to occur at a transform fault boundary where
there is no active creep!
As we discussed, seismic
waves propagate (travel) throughout the entire geosphere from any seismic
event. As we also discussed, there are
surface seismic waves that propagate (travel) along the surface of the
geosphere, and there are body seismic waves that propagate (travel) throughout
the interior of the geosphere. The two
types of body seismic waves are P-waves (pressure waves or primary waves) and
S-waves (shear-stress waves or secondary waves). A seismometer is a device that detects
seismic waves. The operation of a
seismometer is based on the principle of inertia, which states that it is more
difficult to change the motion of a more massive (heavier) object and it is
less difficult (easier) to change the motion of a less massive (lighter)
object. If an object is at rest, it has
a tendency to remain at rest, and a more massive (heavier) object has a greater
tendency to remain at rest. To build a
primitive seismometer, we suspend a very massive (very heavy) object from the
ceiling. This object is so massive
(heavy) that it will not move, even during intense vibrations. We attach writing utensils such as pencils to
the heavy object, and these writing utensils will make marks upon paper during
vibrations. The pencils make marks not
because the pencils move; the pencils are attached to the massive (heavy)
object, which does not move. The writing
utensils make marks upon the paper because the paper moves! We can attach three mutually perpendicular
writing utensils to the massive (heavy) object to record vibrations in all
three dimensions. The piece of paper
with the pencil marks is called a seismograph, the seismometer’s recording of
the detected seismic waves.
From the arrival times of the
P-waves and the S-waves, we can calculate the distance between the seismic
event and the seismometer, as we discussed.
However, this does not reveal precisely where the seismic event
occurred. For example, suppose we
calculate that a seismic event occurred one hundred kilometers from a
seismometer. Was the seismic event one
hundred kilometers to the north? Was the
seismic event one hundred kilometers to the west? Was the seismic event one hundred kilometers
to the southeast? We can draw a circle
with a radius of one hundred kilometers centered on the seismometer, and all we
can deduce is that the seismic event occurred somewhere on the circumference of
that circle. Suppose a second
seismometer at a different location, again using the arrival times of the
P-waves and the S-waves, reveals that the same seismic event occurred fifty
kilometers from that seismometer. We can
draw a circle with a radius of fifty kilometers centered on that seismometer,
and we can deduce that the seismic event occurred somewhere on the
circumference of that second circle.
However, if the seismic event occurred somewhere on the circumference of
the first circle and somewhere on the circumference of the second circle, then
the seismic event must have occurred somewhere on the intersection of these two
circles. In general, two circles
intersect at two different points. If we
had a third seismometer at a third location, we could construct a third circle
centered on that seismometer, and therefore the seismic event must have
occurred at the intersection of all three circles. In general, three circles intersect at a single
point. Therefore, to pinpoint the
precise location of a seismic event, we must have at least three
seismometers. The geometrical procedure
of finding the intersection of three circles is called trilateration. Therefore, we determine the precise location
of a seismic event using trilateration.
The source of the seismic
energy from a seismic event is a point deep within the geosphere called the
focus. The seismic waves propagate
outward from the focus in all directions.
The point on the surface of the geosphere directly above the focus is
called the epicenter, but the epicenter is not the source of the seismic
energy. Again, the focus deep within the
geosphere is the source of the seismic energy.
However, while standing on the surface of the geosphere, it appears as
if the epicenter is the source of the seismic energy, when in fact the source
of the seismic energy is the focus deep within the geosphere underneath the
epicenter. As seismic waves propagate
outward, the total energy of the seismic event is spread over a larger and
larger sphere. Hence, the seismic energy
becomes diluted, and seismometers further and further from the seismic event
will detect weaker and weaker vibrations.
Seismometers closer to the seismic event will detect stronger vibrations
from the same seismic event. The total
energy liberated from a seismic event is called the magnitude of the seismic
event, while the strength of vibrations detected by a seismometer is called the
local intensity of the vibrations. The
local intensity measured by a seismometer depends upon how near or how distant
the seismometer is from the seismic event.
In other words, the local intensity measured by a seismometer depends
upon the distance of the seismometer from the seismic event. However, the magnitude of the seismic event
is a fixed number, since it is the total energy liberated by the seismic
event. The Mercalli
scale is a local intensity scale, named for the Italian geologist and Catholic
priest Giuseppe Mercalli who formulated this scale in
the year 1902. Weaker vibrations
measured by a seismometer are lower numbers on the Mercalli
scale, while stronger vibrations measured by a seismometer are higher numbers
on the Mercalli scale. We can calculate the magnitude (the total
energy) liberated by the seismic event from the local intensity of the
vibrations measured by a seismometer together with the distance between the
seismic event and the seismometer, as determined from the arrival times of the
P-waves and the S-waves. The Richter scale
is a magnitude scale that measures the total energy liberated by seismic
events, named for the American seismologist Charles Francis Richter who
formulated this scale in the year 1935.
Less energetic seismic events have lower Richter magnitudes, while more
energetic seismic events have higher Richter magnitudes. The Richter scale is also a logarithmic
scale, meaning that higher Richter magnitudes are unimaginably more powerful
than lower Richter magnitudes, which are unimaginably weaker. In particular, every unit on the Richter
scale is roughly thirty times more powerful than the previous unit on the
Richter scale. For example, a five on
the Richter scale is roughly thirty times more powerful than a four. A six on the Richter scale is roughly thirty
times more powerful than a five, which makes a six roughly nine hundred (thirty
times thirty) times more powerful than a four.
A seven on the Richter scale is roughly thirty times more powerful than
a six, which makes a seven roughly nine hundred (thirty times thirty) times
more powerful than a five, which makes a seven roughly twenty-seven thousand
(thirty times thirty times thirty) times more powerful than a four. This reveals that higher Richter magnitudes
are unimaginably more energetic than lower Richter magnitudes, since we must
multiply by a string of thirties to calculate their relative energies. This also reveals that lower Richter
magnitudes are unimaginably less energetic than higher Richter magnitudes,
since we must divide by a string of thirties to calculate their relative
energies. Higher Richter magnitude
seismic events are much more rare, while lower Richter magnitude seismic events
are much more common. For example, there
are roughly ten million first-magnitude seismic events on planet Earth every
year. This is roughly once every three
seconds! However, eighth-magnitude
earthquakes only occur roughly once a year on planet Earth. Ninth-magnitude earthquakes only occur
roughly once a decade on planet Earth, and tenth magnitude earthquakes only
occur roughly once a century on planet Earth.
Note that there is no upper limit to the Richter scale. Theoretically, an eleventh-magnitude
earthquake would only occur roughly once a millennium! There is also no lower limit to the Richter
scale. For example, there are roughly
one hundred million zeroth-magnitude seismic events on planet Earth every
year. There are roughly one billion
negative-first-magnitude seismic events on planet Earth every year, and there
are roughly ten billion negative-second-magnitude seismic events on planet Earth
every year.
Seismology was an inexact
science before the 1960s. In particular, all Richter magnitudes before
the 1960s were estimates, not exact
calculations. Seismology became an exact
science in the 1960s thanks to the underground detonation
of thermonuclear fusion bombs.
Throughout the 1950s, thermonuclear fusion
bombs were detonated above ground; entire islands in the Pacific Ocean were
obliterated during these above-ground tests.
In the year 1963, the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics (the U.S.S.R. or the Soviet Union) signed the Limited Test Ban
Treaty, banning the test-detonation of any nuclear weapon underwater or above
ground, including outer space. However,
this treaty did not ban underground detonations. Hence, when the United States and the Soviet
Union began test-detonating thermonuclear fusion bombs underground,
seismologists began detecting the resulting seismic waves. From knowing the precise location of the
detonated bomb and its precise energy yield, seismologists calibrated the
Richter scale into a precise energy scale.
For example, a Richter magnitude of 3.21 has an energy yield of one ton
of trinitrotoluene (one ton of TNT), a Richter magnitude of 5.21 has an energy
yield of one thousand tons of trinitrotoluene (one kiloton of TNT), and a
Richter magnitude of 7.21 has an energy yield of one million tons of
trinitrotoluene (one megaton of TNT).
Often, not all of the elastic
potential (stored) energy is liberated during an earthquake. Several hours after the earthquake, weaker
vibrations may occur called aftershocks.
Small amounts of energy may also be liberated before the earthquake
occurs. These are called foreshocks. The word foreshock is derived from the word
before. Our discussion of seismology may
have given the impression that earthquakes can only occur at transform fault
boundaries without active creep always following foreshocks. In actuality, we cannot predict when or where
an earthquake will occur. Firstly, an
earthquake may not be preceded by any foreshocks. Secondly, earthquakes not only occur at
transform fault boundaries without active creep; earthquakes may occur at
transform fault boundaries where there is active creep. Furthermore, earthquakes need not even occur
at transform fault boundaries.
Earthquakes also occur at convergent plate boundaries and at divergent
plate boundaries for example. Finally,
earthquakes need not even occur near plate boundaries. For example, it is a common misconception
that earthquakes in the United States can only occur near its west coast due to
the San Andreas Fault. In actuality,
earthquakes occur throughout the United States.
The east coast of the United States is far from any plate boundary, yet
there are earthquakes near its east coast.
These earthquakes need not be weak either. In fact, some of the most powerful
earthquakes that have ever occurred in the United States have occurred near its
east coast. Geologists do not yet
understand how powerful earthquakes occur far from plate boundaries.
Vulcanology
Vulcanology is the study of igneous activity, and a vulcanologist is someone who studies igneous activity. These words are derived from Vulcan, the
ancient mythological Roman god of fire.
The study of intrusive/plutonic igneous activity deep within the Earth
is simply called intrusive/plutonic vulcanology,
while the study of extrusive/volcanic igneous activity near the surface of the
Earth is simply called extrusive/volcanic vulcanology. Not much is known about intrusive/plutonic vulcanology, since we cannot directly observe the deep
interior of the geosphere. Intrusive
molten rock deep within the geosphere is called magma, while extrusive molten
rock near the surface of the geosphere is called lava. Magma is not just molten rock; magma is
actually a mixture of the three states of matter. The molten (liquid) component of magma is
called the melt. There are solid rocks
mixed with the melt, called the crystallized solids. There are gases trapped within magma, called
the volatiles. The most abundant
volatile within magma is water vapor.
We can classify molten rock
based on its mineral composition. Since
the vast majority of all minerals are silicate minerals, we therefore classify
molten rock based on its silicate composition.
In this course, we will refer to molten rock (either magma or lava)
composed predominantly of dark silicates as mafic molten rock, since such
molten rock when cooled will crystallize to form mafic igneous rock. In particular, mafic magma crystallizes to
form gabbro since gabbro is an intrusive/plutonic mafic igneous rock, while
mafic lava crystallizes to form basalt since basalt is an extrusive/volcanic
mafic igneous rock. In this course, we
will refer to molten rock (either magma or lava) composed predominantly of
light silicates as felsic molten rock, since such molten rock when cooled will
crystallize to form felsic igneous rock.
In particular, felsic magma crystallizes to form granite since granite
is an intrusive/plutonic felsic igneous rock, while felsic lava crystallizes to
form rhyolite since rhyolite is an extrusive/volcanic felsic igneous rock. In this course, we will refer to molten rock
(either magma or lava) composed predominantly of intermediate silicates as
intermediate molten rock, since such molten rock when cooled will crystallize
to form intermediate igneous rock. In
particular, intermediate magma crystallizes to form diorite since diorite is an
intrusive/plutonic intermediate igneous rock, while intermediate lava
crystallizes to form andesite since andesite is an extrusive/volcanic
intermediate igneous rock. Since
continental plates are composed predominantly of felsic rock, we find felsic
magma underneath these continental plates.
If this felsic magma extrudes out of the continent, it becomes felsic
lava. Since oceanic plates are composed
predominantly of mafic rock, we find mafic magma underneath oceanic plates,
which are themselves at the bottom of the ocean. If this mafic magma extrudes out of the ocean
basins at the ocean floor, it becomes mafic lava.
As we discussed, quartz is a
light silicate, and molten quartz is called silica. Hence, we redefine felsic molten rock as
either magma or lava composed of the greatest quantity of silica. We also redefine mafic molten rock as either
magma or lava composed of the least quantity of silica. Finally, we redefine intermediate molten rock
as either magma or lava composed of an intermediate quantity of silica. The quantity of silica within molten rock
determines the viscosity of the molten rock.
The viscosity of any fluid is a measure of the internal friction within
the fluid. A high viscosity fluid has
much internal friction, thus making it difficult for the high viscosity fluid
to flow. A low viscosity fluid has
little internal friction, thus making it easier for the low viscosity fluid to
flow. For example, honey and molasses
have high viscosity, and indeed honey and molasses do not flow easily. Liquid water by comparison has a low
viscosity, and indeed liquid water does flow much more easily than honey or
molasses. Since felsic molten rock is
composed of the most silica, felsic molten rock is most viscous. If high viscosity felsic lava extrudes out of
a continent, it will build a tall, steep volcano, since the high viscosity
felsic lava cannot flow far before it cools and crystallizes into
rhyolite. These tall, steep volcanoes on
continents are called stratovolcanoes.
Since mafic molten rock is composed of the least silica, mafic molten
rock is least viscous. If low viscosity
mafic lava extrudes out of an ocean basin, it will build a wide, shallow
volcano, since the low viscosity mafic lava can flow far before it cools and
crystallizes into basalt. These wide,
shallow volcanoes in the ocean are called shield volcanoes, such as the
Hawaiian Islands for example.
When an oceanic plate subducts underneath a continental plate, the oceanic plate
melts into mafic magma with the least quantities of silica. Underneath the continental plate, there is
felsic magma with the greatest quantities of silica. Hence, the mafic magma with the least silica
mixes with the felsic magma with the most silica to form intermediate magma
with intermediate quantities of silica at these subduction zones. This intermediate magma may extrude out of
the overlying continent, becoming intermediate lava. For example, the Andes Mountains near the
west coast of South America formed from the subduction of the Nazca plate
underneath the west coast of the South American plate, as we discussed. The mixture of the mafic magma from the
melting Nazca plate and the felsic magma underneath the South American plate
forms intermediate magma, which extrudes out of the South American plate as
intermediate lava. Therefore, the Andes
Mountains are built from intermediate igneous activity. Andesite is an extrusive/volcanic
intermediate igneous rock, and indeed andesite is named for the Andes
Mountains, much of which is composed of andesite.
When magma deep within the
geosphere extrudes out of the geosphere to become lava, the trapped volatiles
are liberated to the Earth’s atmosphere.
This is an important distinction between magma and lava. Magma is not only intrusive/plutonic molten
rock deep within the geosphere; magma also has large quantities of volatiles
trapped within it. Lava is not only
extrusive/volcanic molten rock near the surface of the geosphere; lava has also
liberated most of its volatiles. This
significant difference warrants these two different terms for molten rock,
magma for intrusive molten rock deep within the geosphere and lava for
extrusive molten rock near the surface of the geosphere. The large quantities of silica within felsic
magma are able to trap an abundance of volatiles within it. Hence, when felsic lava erupts from a
stratovolcano, all of these trapped volatiles are liberated. Thus, stratovolcanic
eruptions are the most violent eruptions.
These eruptions are often explosive; a stratovolcano can obliterate
itself when it erupts! The small
quantities of silica within mafic magma can only trap a small amount of
volatiles within it. Hence, when mafic
lava erupts from a shield volcano, only small quantities of trapped volatiles
are liberated. Thus, shield-volcanic
eruptions are the most gentle eruptions.
For example, the active volcanoes on the main Hawaiian island suffer
from continuous but very gentle eruptions.
These eruptions are so quiet that there are actually vulcanologists
living on the side of these active volcanoes directly studying these gentle but
continuous eruptions!
It is not just lava that
extrudes from igneous activity. Gases
are also liberated, predominantly water vapor.
These gases were formerly the trapped volatiles within the magma deep
within the geosphere. The liberation of
gases from igneous activity is called outgassing. Solids are also ejected from igneous
activity; these solids are called pyroclastic materials. The smallest pyroclastic material is called
ash, which is small enough and therefore light enough to drift in the Earth’s
atmosphere. Other pyroclastic materials
are heavy enough that after ejecting from the eruption, the Earth’s gravity
pulls them back downward onto either the side of the volcano or onto the
surrounding landscapes. With every
eruption from a volcano, pyroclastic materials are ejected, many of which land
on the side of the volcano. Eventually,
many layers of pyroclastic materials on the side of the volcano will slide down
the volcano. This landslide composed
primarily of pyroclastic materials is called a lahar. With each lahar, pyroclastic materials slide
down the volcano and land at the base of the volcano. After many lahars, an accumulation of
pyroclastic materials builds a small volcano at the base of the major volcano. This small volcano is called a cinder
cone. These cinder cones are the most
common type of volcano. Caution: the
definition of a volcano is not a mountain with lava extruding out from it, as
is commonly believed. The strict definition
of a volcano is any landform built from extrusive igneous activity. Lava is not required to extrude out of a
landform for it to satisfy this definition and be classified as a volcano. Since cinder cones are indeed landforms built
from extrusive igneous activity, they are classified as volcanoes. Lava could still extrude out of a cinder
cone, since lava is not required to extrude out of a major volcano or any
volcano for that matter. Lava may
extrude out from any location on the surface of the geosphere. In fact, on most occasions lava does not
extrude out of volcanoes. Most extrusive
igneous activity is from fissures, cracks on the surface of the geosphere from
which lava may erupt.
Any landform built from
extrusive igneous activity is called a volcano.
Therefore, any landform built from intrusive igneous activity should
properly be called a plutano. However, all vulcanologists
call any landform built from intrusive igneous activity a pluton. If magma deep within the geosphere flows
within a fault and cools, it may crystalize into an intrusive/plutonic
landform. These plutons are called
dikes. Two other types of plutons are
sills and laccoliths. Mafic molten rock
flows easily, since it has low viscosity.
Hence, when mafic magma deep within the geosphere cools, it may
crystallize to form wide and thin intrusive/plutonic landforms. These plutons are called sills, since they
are similar in shape to a windowsill.
Felsic molten rock does not flow easily, since it has high viscosity. Hence, when felsic magma deep within the
geosphere cools, it may crystallize to form bulged intrusive/plutonic
landforms. These plutons are called
laccoliths. The largest laccoliths in
the world are called batholiths. These batholiths
compose cratons, the deep and ancient interiors of continents. Not much more is known about plutons or intrusive
igneous activity in general, since it occurs deep within the geosphere.
The entire margin of the
Pacific Ocean is subduction zones, resulting in igneous activity nearly
everywhere along the margin of the Pacific Ocean. This is called the Pacific Ring of Fire. For example, the Andes Mountains on the west
coast of South America are volcanically active.
The Aleutian Islands in Alaska are volcanically active. There is igneous activity in the Japanese
Islands and the Philippine Islands.
There is also igneous activity near the west coast of North
America. For example, Mount Saint Helens
in the Cascade Range suffered from a violent eruption in the year 1980.
Every igneous eruption ejects
pyroclastic materials, and the smallest type of pyroclastic material is called
ash. This ejected ash is small enough
and therefore light enough to drift in the Earth’s atmosphere. A single igneous eruption powerful enough
could eject enough ash into the atmosphere to surround the entire planet,
significantly reducing the amount of incoming sunlight to the Earth. The result is global cooling, significantly
cold temperatures across the entire planet.
For example, the eruption of Laki Fissure in
Iceland in June 1783 caused the winter of late 1783 to early 1784 to be
bitterly cold. The eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia in April 1815 caused the year 1816 to
be so cold that that year is commonly known as the Year Without a Summer; there
was heavy snow in June and frost in July and August of that year! The eruption of Mount Krakatoa/Krakatau in
Indonesia in August 1883 caused five years of global cooling. The eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the
Philippines in June 1991 caused a measurable cooling of planet Earth.
The Newhall-Self scale is a
volcanic explosivity scale, named for American
geologists Christopher Newhall and Stephen Self who together formulated the
scale in the year 1982. Lower numbers on
the Newhall-Self scale are more gentle igneous eruptions that occur more frequently,
while higher numbers on the Newhall-Self scale are more violent igneous
eruptions that are more rare. The
continuous but gentle eruptions of the volcanoes on the main Hawaiian island
ranks zero, the lowest rank, on the Newhall-Self scale. Eruptions of rank one on the Newhall-Self scale
occur roughly once per day, eruptions of rank two on the Newhall-Self scale
occur roughly twice per week, and eruptions of rank three on the Newhall-Self
scale occur roughly once per month. The
eruption of Laki Fissure in the year 1783 ranks four
on the Newhall-Self scale. Such
eruptions occur roughly once per year.
The eruption of Mount Saint Helens in the year 1980 and the eruption of
Mount Vesuvius anno Domini 79, which destroyed several ancient Roman cities
such as Pompeii, both rank five on the Newhall-Self scale. Such eruptions occur roughly once per
decade. The eruption of Mount
Krakatoa/Krakatau in the year 1883 and the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the
year 1991 both rank six on the Newhall-Self scale. Such eruptions occur roughly once per century. The eruption of Mount Tambora
in the year 1815 ranks seven on the Newhall-Self scale. Such eruptions occur roughly once per
millennium. The last eruption of the
underground supervolcano Yellowstone roughly 630,000
years ago ranks eight, the highest rank, on the Newhall-Self scale. Such eruptions occur roughly once every ten
thousand years. If the underground supervolcano Yellowstone were to erupt again, it would
cause a catastrophic loss of life across most of the North American continent.
Paleogeology
Paleogeology is the study of the ancient geosphere, and a paleogeologist is someone who studies the ancient
geosphere. These words are derived from
the Greek root paleo- for ancient. The
ultimate goal of paleogeology is to determine the
history of planet Earth. Nearly
everything paleogeologists have deduced about the
history of the Earth is from rocks, and all of the information about Earth
history recorded in rocks is called the rock record. In determining the history of planet Earth,
we must make a distinction between relative dating and absolute dating. With relative dating, we can determine the
events of Earth history and even the correct ordering of these events, but we
cannot determine how long ago these events occurred. In other words, relative dating reveals that
event A was followed by event B which was itself followed by event C for
example, but relative dating does not reveal how long ago these events
occurred. Did these events occur thousands
of years ago? Did they occur millions of
years ago? Did they occur billions of
years ago? Relative dating cannot answer
these questions. Absolute dating does
reveal how long ago events in Earth history occurred. Paleogeologists
have actually succeeded in determining the events in Earth history and their
proper order using relative dating.
Therefore, most of our discussion on paleogeology
will be in the context of relative dating.
We will however conclude our discussion of paleogeology
with a brief overview of absolute dating.
Sedimentary rock lithifies
from layers of sediments, as we discussed.
A layer of lithified sedimentary rock is called a stratum. This word stratum is derived from a Latin
word meaning layer. The lower strata of
sedimentary rock are older since they were deposited first, and higher strata
of sedimentary rock are younger since they were deposited later on top of the
lower strata. This obvious truth is the
most fundamental technique of relative dating and is called the Law of
Superposition. Another technique of
relative dating is the Principle of Original Horizontality, which states that a
geologic event that folded rock for example must have occurred later (more
recently) than the formation of the sedimentary rock in the first place. More plainly, sedimentary rock forms
originally horizontally, hence the name of this technique of relative
dating. Another technique of relative
dating is the Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships, which states that
anything that cuts across strata of sedimentary rock such as a fault for
example must have occurred later (more recently) than the formation of the
strata themselves. A fossil is the
remains of any ancient organism that has been lithified into rock. Fossils are always found within sedimentary
rock in a certain particular order, the order of biological evolution (from
less evolved to more evolved). This is
called the Principle of Fossil Succession, and it is another technique of
relative dating. There are some species
of organisms that only existed on this planet for a brief period of time,
perhaps only a few million years.
Whenever we find such a fossil in one stratum in one rock formation, we
can be certain that that stratum corresponds with another stratum in another
rock formation with the same fossil. These
valuable fossils are called index fossils, and they provide an essential
technique of relative dating.
Roughly one century ago, the
oldest rocks paleogeologists discovered were roughly
five hundred and fifty million years old.
Therefore, paleogeologists formerly believed
that planet Earth is roughly that age.
It was only later that much older rocks were discovered, and today we
now know that planet Earth is nearly ten times older, roughly 4.5 billion years
old. Nevertheless, paleogeologists
from roughly a century ago took what they believed was the entire history of
planet Earth and divided it into three eras: the Paleozoic Era, the Mesozoic
Era, and the Cenozoic Era. The Greek
root paleo- means ancient, as we discussed, and the Greek root zoo- means
animal. For example, zoology is the
study of animals, a zoologist is someone who studies animals, and humans visit
animals in a zoo. Paleogeologists
use the Greek root zoo- for life in general, not just animal life. Therefore, the term Paleozoic Era literally
means the era of ancient life. The Greek
root meso- means middle, as we discussed, and again paleogeologists use the Greek root zoo- for life in
general. Therefore, the term Mesozoic
Era literally means the era of middle life.
The Greek root ceno- means recent, and
therefore the term Cenozoic Era literally means the era of recent life. Today, we understand that these three eras
together only constitute the most recent five hundred and fifty million years
of Earth history. The first four billion
years of Earth history is placed into an extremely long period of time called
the Precambrian. In summary, the first
four billion years of the history of planet Earth is the Precambrian followed
by the Paleozoic Era (the era of ancient life) followed by the Mesozoic Era
(the era of middle life) followed by the Cenozoic Era (the era of recent life).
Because of the rock cycle,
rocks are continuously changing from one type to another. Hence, it is more likely for an old rock to
have already changed into another younger rock; that is, it is less likely for
an old rock to remain the same type of rock to the present day. Therefore, young rocks are more common, while
old rocks are more rare. As a result,
the rock record is more and more scarce as paleogeologists
attempt to push our understanding of the history of the Earth further and
further backward in time. Paleogeologists have determined recent Earth history, over
tens of millions of years, in detail. Paleogeologists are less certain about what occurred in
Earth history hundreds of millions of years ago, and paleogeologists
are most uncertain about what occurred in Earth history billions of years
ago. As we discussed, the Earth formed
almost entirely molten. Hence, there
were virtually no rocks when the Earth first formed, and therefore there is no
rock record left from the actual formation of the Earth. Without a rock record, paleogeologists
will never know with certainty what occurred during the earliest periods of
Earth history. We have deduced that the
Earth formed almost entirely molten and differentiated itself into a core,
mantle, and crust from the laws of physics, not from the rock record.
The Precambrian began when
the Earth formed roughly 4.5 billion years ago and ended roughly five hundred
and fifty million years ago. At the
beginning of the Precambrian, the Earth formed almost entirely molten and
differentiated itself into a most dense metallic core, a less dense mantle
composed of iron-rich silicate rock, and a least dense crust composed of
iron-poor silicate rock. The felsic
parts of the lithosphere were the first microcontinents, which collided with
one another to form small-sized continents.
The small-sized continents eventually became medium-sized and even
large-sized continents as oceanic plates subducted
beneath them, as we discussed. We will
discuss the formation of the Earth’s atmosphere and the Earth’s oceans later in
the course. Roughly one billion years
after the Earth formed (roughly 3.5 billion years ago), the most primitive
lifeforms evolved in the Earth’s oceans.
These lifeforms were unicellular microorganisms, perhaps bacteria and
blue-green algae. Over a couple of
billion years, these primitive lifeforms transformed the composition of the
Earth’s atmosphere, as we will discuss later in the course. Eventually, these unicellular microorganisms
evolved into multicellular microorganisms.
By the end of the Precambrian, the most primitive macroscopic organisms
had evolved, such as invertebrate animals.
All life that ever existed throughout the entire Precambrian was
entirely in the Earth’s oceans.
The Paleozoic Era began
roughly five hundred and fifty million years ago and ended roughly two hundred
and fifty million years ago. The
beginning of the Paleozoic Era is commonly known as the age of invertebrates,
since the most evolved organisms on this planet were invertebrate animals, such
as modern-day jellyfish. Over many
millions of years, some invertebrate animals evolved into vertebrate
animals. The most primitive vertebrate
animals are fishes, which can only breathe underwater with gills. The first fish that evolved were the jawless
fish, such as certain modern-day species of eel. Over many millions of years, some of the
jawless fish evolved into cartilaginous fish, such as modern-day sharks and
rays. Over many more millions of years,
some of the cartilaginous fish evolved into bony fish, such as modern-day tuna
and salmon. Hence, the middle of the
Paleozoic Era is commonly known as the age of fishes. By the end of the Paleozoic Era, some of the
fishes evolved to amphibians. The strict
definition of an amphibian is a vertebrate animal that spends its infancy
breathing underwater with gills, loses its gills during adolescence and grows
lungs, and spends its adulthood breathing air with lungs. Examples of modern-day amphibians include
frogs, toads, and salamanders. Hence,
the end of the Paleozoic Era is commonly known as the age of amphibians. As some fish evolved into amphibians, there
must have been vertebrate animals that were intermediate between fish (which
can only breathe underwater with gills) and amphibians (which as adults can
only breathe air with lungs). These
intermediate vertebrate animals may have required both gills and lungs to
breathe. A modern-day example of such an
intermediate vertebrate is the lungfish, which has both gills and lungs. Some species of lungfish must inhale air with
their lungs and must exhale underwater with their gills.
At the end of the Paleozoic
Era, some amphibians evolved further to become reptiles. The strict definition of a reptile is a
vertebrate animal that spends its entire life breathing air with lungs after
hatching from a hard-shelled egg.
Examples of modern-day reptiles include alligators, crocodiles, lizards,
turtles, tortoises, and snakes. The
entire Mesozoic Era is commonly known as the age of reptiles. Since the dinosaurs were particularly
dominant during this era, the entire Mesozoic Era is also commonly known as the
age of dinosaurs. The Mesozoic Era began
roughly two hundred and fifty million years ago and ended roughly sixty-six
million years ago.
At the end of the Mesozoic
Era, most of the organisms on planet Earth suddenly became extinct, thus ending
the Mesozoic Era and beginning the Cenozoic Era. During the Cenozoic Era, the mammals are the
most evolved organism on this planet.
Hence, the entire Cenozoic Era is commonly known as the age of mammals. A mammal is a vertebrate animal that spends
its entire life breathing air with lungs after being born live. The strict definition of a mammal is a
vertebrate animal where the females feed their young with mammary glands, hence
the term mammal. As mammals evolved,
there must have been vertebrate animals that were intermediate between reptiles
(which lay and hatch from eggs) and mammals (which are born live). A modern-day example of such an intermediate
vertebrate is the platypus, which although it is a mammal nevertheless lays and
hatches from eggs. Mammals are also
endothermic, commonly known as warm blooded, while all the other vertebrate
animals we have discussed are ectothermic, commonly known as cold blooded. Ectothermic animals are not particularly
adaptable, since they can only regulate their body temperatures within a narrow
range of the surrounding environmental temperature. Mammals are endothermic; they are able to
regulate their body temperatures over a fairly wide range of the surrounding
environmental temperature. As a result,
mammals are extraordinarily adaptable, and indeed mammals have adapted to live
in every environment on planet Earth.
This makes the diversity of mammals enormous. Examples of modern-day mammals include
rodents (mice, rats, hamsters, gerbils, lemmings, muskrats, voles, guinea pigs,
porcupines, gophers, beavers, squirrels, chipmunks, groundhogs/woodchucks, and
prairie dogs), lagomorphs (rabbits and hares), moles, shrews, hedgehogs, bats,
anteaters, sloths, hyenas, mongooses, felids (cats, lions, tigers, leopards,
jaguars, cheetahs, cougars/pumas, and lynxes), canids (dogs, wolves, coyotes,
jackals, and foxes), ursids (bears), raccoons,
mustelids (weasels, badgers, ferrets, minks, wolverines, and otters), skunks,
aardvarks, pinnipeds (seals and walruses), elephants, equids (horses, donkeys,
and zebras), rhinoceroses, tapirs, bovids (cattle,
bison, buffaloes, antelopes, yaks, sheep, and goats), suids
(swine), giraffes, camelids (camels and llamas), cervids
(deer, elk, moose, and reindeer), hippopotami, and cetaceans (whales, dolphins,
and porpoises). Late in the Cenozoic
Era, the most intelligent group of mammals evolved: the primates (lemurs,
monkeys, baboons, gibbons, orangutans, gorillas, and chimpanzees). Even later in the Cenozoic Era, the most
intelligent group of primates evolved, making them the most evolved mammals and
therefore the most evolved organisms on planet Earth: humans. The first species of humans evolved roughly
four million years ago, and the particular species Homo sapiens evolved much more recently, very roughly two hundred
thousand years ago. Homo sapiens are the most evolved organisms on Earth because they
are sentient, meaning that they are consciously aware of their own existence,
consciously aware of the existence of the world around them, and can express
abstract ideas with spoken language. The
Cenozoic Era began roughly sixty-six million years ago and continues to the
present day.
Note that there is a clear
evolutionary progression of vertebrate animals, from fish to amphibians to
reptiles to mammals. We see this clear
evolutionary progression when we study not just the anatomy of vertebrate
animals but also the physiology of vertebrate animals. Consider the respiratory systems of
vertebrate animals for example. Fish are
only able to breathe underwater with gills.
Amphibians spend their infancy breathing underwater with gills and spend
their adulthood breathing air with lungs.
Reptiles spend their entire lives breathing air with lungs after
hatching from hard-shelled eggs. Mammals
spend their entire lives breathing air with lungs after being born live. Consider the cardiovascular/circulatory
systems of vertebrate animals as another example. Fish have a two-chambered heart. Amphibians have a three-chambered heart. Reptiles have a three-and-a-half chambered
heart. Mammals have a four-chambered
heart. Consider the nervous systems of
vertebrate animals as yet another example.
The fish brain has an enormous medulla oblongata, a medium-sized
cerebellum, and a tiny cerebrum. The
amphibian brain has a smaller medulla oblongata, and the reptile brain has an
even smaller medulla oblongata. Finally,
the mammal brain has a tiny medulla oblongata, a medium-sized cerebellum, and
an enormous cerebrum. Again, note the
clear evolutionary progression of vertebrate animals from fish to amphibians to
reptiles to mammals. Birds are regarded
as intermediate in evolution between reptiles and mammals. For example, birds hatch from hard-shelled
eggs like reptiles, but birds are endothermic like mammals. In the correct order from less evolved to
more evolved, the vertebrate animals include jawless fish, cartilaginous fish,
bony fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. There are also vertebrates that are
intermediate in evolution between these classes, such as the lungfish
(intermediate between bony fish and amphibians) and the platypus (intermediate
between birds and mammals).
Once every roughly one
hundred million years, almost all the organisms on planet Earth suddenly become
extinct. This is called an extinction
level event. The most recent extinction
level event ended the Mesozoic Era and began the Cenozoic Era roughly sixty-six
million years ago. One theory to explain
extinction level events is the asteroid-impact theory. An asteroid is a large chunk of metal and
rock in outer space. According to the
asteroid-impact theory, once every roughly one hundred million years, an
asteroid falls from outer space toward the Earth and collides with the surface
of the Earth. It is not difficult to
calculate that such a collision would unleash roughly one thousand times the
combined nuclear arsenal of the entire world!
This much liberated energy would completely obliterate all life at and
near the point of impact. In addition,
this much energy would shatter the asteroid into innumerable extremely hot
fragments that would shoot outward from the point of impact and then rain back
downward, igniting global forest fires and heating most of the Earth’s
atmosphere to inhospitable temperatures, eradicating life over an even larger
area. Most significantly, this much
energy would pulverize rock at the point of impact into dust and ash, and the
force of the collision would eject that dust and ash into the atmosphere,
surrounding the entire planet and blocking most sunlight for several months,
perhaps even a couple of years. Without
sunlight, most plants would die, since plants require the energy of sunlight to
synthesize their own food (photosynthesis).
Most herbivorous animals would then die, since herbivores eat
plants. Most carnivorous animals would
then die, since carnivores eat herbivores.
The result is an extinction level event, when most of the organisms
across the entire planet suddenly become extinct. In the late 1970s,
a crater was discovered in Yucatán in Mexico, named the Chicxulub crater. This crater is roughly the correct size that
would be caused by an asteroid impact.
The Chicxulub crater is also the correct age, having formed at the
stratum of sedimentary rock between the end of the Mesozoic Era and the
beginning of the Cenozoic Era. Finally,
this stratum of rock is rich in dense elemental metals such as iridium and
osmium that are less abundant on the surface of the Earth but more abundant in
asteroids. Indeed, this stratum of rock
between the end of the Mesozoic Era and the beginning of the Cenozoic Era is
rich in iridium and osmium throughout the entire planet. Hence, this asteroid-impact theory for
extinction level events has been proven, at least for the most recent
extinction level event that ended the Mesozoic Era and began the Cenozoic
Era. We are certain an extinction level
event occurs once every roughly one hundred million years from the sudden
disappearance of fossils within the rock record. From the observations of the orbits of
asteroids around the Sun relative to the Earth’s orbit around the Sun and
calculating probabilities, we estimate that an asteroid should collide with the
Earth once every roughly one hundred million years. This further supports the theory that all
extinction level events are caused by asteroid impacts. There are other theories to explain
extinction level events however. Another
theory states that roughly once every one hundred million years, there is an
accumulation of poisonous gases within the oceans from a sudden increase in
submarine volcanic activity. These
poisonous gases would kill most life in the oceans. In addition, these poisonous gases would
bubble out of the oceans, also killing most life on the continents. Perhaps all of the poisonous gases in the
oceans accumulate at a certain location within the ocean and bubble out of the
ocean as a single burst, killing most life on the continents. To summarize this alternative theory, once
every roughly one hundred million years, the ocean flatulates
(farts), and the stink kills most life on Earth!
The most reliable method of
absolute dating is radioactive dating.
As we discussed, certain atoms in the universe are radioactive, meaning
that their nucleus is unstable because it has too much energy. This radioactive nucleus emits particles to lower
its own energy to achieve greater stability.
The original radioactive atom is called the parent atom, and the new
atom transmuted from the original atom is called the daughter atom. The radioactive half-life is the amount of
time it takes for one-half of the radioactive parent to transmute into a more
stable daughter. This means that after
two half-lives, one-fourth of the radioactive parent remains, since one-half of
one-half is one-fourth. After three
half-lives, one-eighth of the radioactive parent remains, since one-half of
one-half of one-half is one-eighth.
After four half-lives, one-sixteenth of the radioactive parent remains,
since one-half of one-half of one-half of one-half is one-sixteenth. Hence, by measuring the quantity of radioactive
parent within a rock, we can determine how many half-lives have passed since
the formation of the rock. The half-life
of the radioactive carbon-fourteen
isotope is roughly six thousand years. Hence, this radioactive isotope is used to
date comparatively young rocks. The
half-life of the radioactive uranium-235
isotope is roughly seven hundred million
years. Hence, this radioactive isotope
is used to date comparatively middle-aged rocks. The half-life of the radioactive uranium-238
isotope is roughly 4.5 billion years. Hence, this radioactive isotope is used to
date comparatively old rocks. Using
radioactive dating, paleogeologists have determined that the Cenozoic Era began
roughly sixty-six million years ago, the Mesozoic Era began roughly two hundred
and fifty million years ago, and the Paleozoic Era began roughly five hundred
and fifty million years ago. The oldest
rocks that paleogeologists have ever dated are
roughly 4.5 billion years old. We assume
that planet Earth is slightly older than these oldest rocks, since the Earth
was born almost entirely molten when there were no rocks, leaving no rock
record available to us from the Earth’s initial formation. Hence, a somewhat more accurate estimate for
the age of the Earth is roughly 4.6 billion years.
Libarid A. Maljian homepage at the Department of Physics at CSLA at NJIT
Libarid A. Maljian profile at the Department of Physics at CSLA at NJIT
Department of Physics at CSLA at NJIT
College of Science and Liberal Arts at NJIT
New Jersey Institute of Technology
This webpage was most recently modified on Monday, the twenty-seventh day of February, anno Domini MMXXIII, at 04:15 ante meridiem EST.