This is one of the webpages of Libarid A. Maljian at the Department of Physics at CSLA at NJIT.
New Jersey Institute of Technology
College of Science and Liberal Arts
Department of Physics
The Earth in Space
Fall 2024
Second Examination lecture notes
Mineralogy
Mineralogy is the study of
minerals, and a mineralogist is someone who studies minerals. A mineral is defined
as a naturally occurring solid inorganic object with a definite chemical
structure. As we will discuss shortly, a
rock does not have a definite chemical structure. This is the most important difference between
a mineral and a rock; whereas a mineral has a definite chemical structure, a
rock does not have a definite chemical structure. Every mineral has at least two names: a
mineral name and a chemical name. For
example, the mineral thenardite has the chemical name
sodium sulfate Na2SO4. As another example, the mineral magnesite has
the chemical name magnesium carbonate MgCO3. Some minerals have a third name, its common
designation. For example, the mineral
halite has the chemical name sodium chloride NaCl and
the common designation rock salt or table salt.
As another example, the mineral hematite has the chemical name ferric
oxide Fe2O3 and the common
designation rust.
There are various properties
of minerals that enable us to uniquely identify a
mineral. For example, the color of a
mineral may help us to identify a mineral.
However, the color of a mineral is the least reliable way to identify a
mineral, since there can be some variations in color of even a specific
mineral. The streak of a mineral is its
color in its powdered form, which more reliably identifies a mineral than its
color in its solid form. The luster of a
mineral is how the mineral reflects light.
For example, minerals that are highly reflective
have a metallic luster, since most metals reflect light very well. A dull luster is no luster, meaning the
mineral does not reflect light well at all.
Yet another property of minerals is how the mineral is able to transmit
light through it. Some minerals are more
transparent, meaning they easily transmit light through them. Some minerals are more opaque, meaning that
light is not transmitted through them. In between these two extremes are translucent
minerals, which permit light to be transmitted through
them but not particularly well.
The hardness of a mineral is
its resistance to scratching or rubbing.
We can compare the hardness of two minerals by rubbing or scratching
them against each other. If one mineral
is able to scratch a second mineral, then the first mineral is more hard than the second mineral. If instead the second mineral is able to
scratch the first mineral, then the second mineral is more
hard than the first mineral. The
hardness of minerals is quantified with the Mohs
scale, named for the German mineralogist Friedrich Mohs who defined this scale
in the year 1812. The Mohs scale is numbered from one through ten. Lower numbers on the Mohs scale are assigned to less hard minerals, while higher numbers on
the Mohs scale are assigned to more hard minerals. The least hard mineral on the Mohs scale is
talc, which can easily be crumbled into talcum powder,
commonly known as baby powder. The most hard mineral on the Mohs scale is diamond, which is one
of the mineral forms of carbon. Since
diamond is the most hard mineral on the Mohs scale, no
mineral can scratch a diamond except another diamond.
The tenacity of a mineral is
its resistance to breaking or deforming.
We must break or at least deform a mineral to test its tenacity. There is no tenacity scale analogous to the
Mohs scale for hardness. Instead, we
describe the tenacity of minerals with various terms, such as brittle if the
mineral is easily breakable or malleable if the mineral is easily deformable.
The cleavage of a mineral is
its crystal geometry when broken. This
means that we must break a mineral to test its cleavage. Examples of cleavage types include cubic
cleavage if the mineral breaks with right angles, diagonal cleavage if the
mineral breaks with slanted angles, and lateral cleavage if the mineral breaks
into thin sheets. The habit of a mineral
is its crystal geometry if it happens to form without confinement. Examples of habit types include equant habit
if the mineral forms with equal angles, bladed habit if the mineral forms into
rods, and fibrous habit if the mineral forms with long threads. Most minerals form with some amount of
confinement; therefore, the habit of a mineral often does not manifest itself.
The density of anything in
the universe is the ratio of its mass to its volume. We can measure the density of a solid by
immersing it in a liquid. If the object
is more dense than the liquid, then the solid will
sink until it lands at the bottom of the liquid. If the object is less dense than the liquid,
then the solid will rise until it floats on the surface of the liquid. We almost always
measure the density of a mineral by immersing it in liquid water. The density of a mineral as compared with the
density of liquid water is called the specific gravity
of the mineral. For example, if a
mineral has a specific gravity of two, this means that its density is twice the
density of liquid water; such a mineral would sink in liquid water. As another example, if the specific gravity a
mineral is one-half, this means that its density is half the density of liquid
water; such a mineral would float in liquid water.
There are many other
properties of minerals, such as the taste of a mineral or the smell of a
mineral. Some minerals have magnetic
properties, which can be tested using an ordinary bar magnet such as a
refrigerator magnet. Some minerals are
highly chemically reactive. By using all
of these properties of minerals, we can uniquely identify minerals. This enables us to classify minerals based on
their chemical composition.
There are many classes of
minerals, but by far the most abundant group of minerals are the silicate minerals,
which are based on the silicon-oxygen tetrahedral
group SiO44–. The carbon atom usually forms covalent bonds
with four other atoms with a tetrahedral geometry. The silicon atom also usually forms covalent
bonds with four other atoms with a tetrahedral geometry. Therefore, we can build an almost infinite
diversity of molecules based on either the carbon atom or the silicon
atom. Molecules based on the carbon atom
are called organic molecules, an enormous category of
molecules that is the basis of all life on planet Earth. For example, carbohydrates (including simple
sugars and complex carbohydrates), lipids (fats), proteins, and nucleic acids
(such as deoxyribonucleic acid DNA and ribonucleic acid RNA) are all organic
molecules. Just as organic molecules
form an enormous category of molecules, silicate minerals form an enormous
category of minerals. More than ninety
percent of all minerals are silicate minerals.
Although the carbon-carbon
covalent bond is strong enough to build organic molecules, the silicon-silicon
covalent bond is not strong enough to build silicate minerals. However, the silicon-oxygen covalent bond is
strong enough to build silicate minerals.
Therefore, there is always an oxygen atom between any two silicon atoms
in a silicate mineral. Other atoms also
bond with the silicon atoms within silicate minerals, often metals such as iron
and magnesium. This is also analogous to
organic molecules, where other atoms such as hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen
bond with the carbon atoms within organic molecules.
All life on planet Earth has
evolved based on organic molecules because of the nearly infinite diversity of
molecules based on the carbon atom. It
is theoretically possible that life could evolve on another planet based on silicate
minerals, which themselves compose rocks, as we will discuss shortly. There is a nearly infinite diversity of
silicate minerals, just as there is a nearly infinite diversity of organic
molecules. The tetrahedral geometry of
silicate minerals and organic molecules is also the same. On a hypothetical planet where life evolved
based on silicate minerals, all life would be composed of rocks, which would
themselves be composed of silicate minerals, just as all life on planet Earth
is composed of organic molecules.
Imagine a planet with rock people, rock dogs, rock cats, and rock
trees. This would be a planet where all
life evolved based on silicate minerals instead of organic molecules.
The simplest organic molecule
would be a single carbon atom covalently bonded to other atoms. These are the methanes. We may chemically bond two methanes to each other, resulting in two carbon atoms
covalently bonded to each other and to other atoms. These are the ethanes,
which are essentially double methanes. We may chemically bond another methane to an
ethane (a double methane), resulting in three carbon atoms covalently bonded to
one another and to other atoms. These
are the propanes, which are essentially triple methanes. We may
continue this process until we have constructed long chains of carbon atoms
covalently bonded to one another and to other atoms. These are one-dimensional, single-chain
organic molecules. We may chemically bond
two single-chain organic molecules to each other, resulting in a double-chain
organic molecule. We may chemically bond
another single-chain organic molecule to a double-chain organic molecule,
resulting in a triple-chain organic molecule.
We may continue this process until we have constructed a
two-dimensional, single-sheet organic molecule.
We may chemically bond two single-sheet organic molecules to each other,
resulting in a double-sheet organic molecule.
We may chemically bond another single-sheet organic molecule to a
double-sheet organic molecule, resulting in a triple-sheet organic
molecule. We may continue this process
until we have constructed three-dimensional organic molecules. Remarkably, our discussion of inorganic
silicate minerals will be completely analogous to our discussion of organic
molecules. This further persuades us
that life could evolve on a hypothetical planet based on inorganic silicate
minerals instead of organic molecules.
The simplest silicate mineral
would be a single silicon atom covalently bonded to other atoms. These are the nesosilicates, such as the olivines and the garnets.
Topaz and kyanite are also nesosilicate
minerals. We may chemically bond two
nesosilicates to each other, resulting in two silicon atoms covalently bonded
to each other (with an oxygen atom between them of course) as well as to other
atoms. These are the sorosilicates,
such as the epidotes. The sorosilicates are essentially double nesosilicates. We may chemically bond another nesosilicate
to a sorosilicate (a double nesosilicate), resulting
in three silicon atoms covalently bonded to one another (with oxygen atoms
between them of course) as well as to other atoms. These are triple nesosilicates. We may continue this process until we have
constructed long chains of silicon atoms covalently bonded to one another (with
oxygen atoms between them of course) as well as to other atoms. These are one-dimensional, single-chain
inosilicates, such as the pyroxenes. We
may chemically bond two single-chain inosilicates to each other, resulting in a
double-chain inosilicate, such as the amphiboles. We may chemically bond another single-chain
inosilicate to a double-chain inosilicate, resulting in a triple-chain
inosilicate. We may continue this process
until we have constructed two-dimensional, single-sheet phyllosilicates, such
as the serpentines and the micas. We may
chemically bond two single-sheet phyllosilicates to each other, resulting in a
double-sheet phyllosilicate. We may
chemically bond another single-sheet phyllosilicate to a double-sheet
phyllosilicate, resulting in a triple-sheet phyllosilicate. We may continue this process until we have
constructed three-dimensional tectosilicates, such as the zeolites, the
feldspars, and quartz.
The nesosilicates have the
highest oxygen-to-silicon ratios as well as the most amount of metals, such as
iron and magnesium, chemically bonded with the silicon atoms. This is because a single silicon atom is free
to bond with four other atoms simultaneously.
However, as we progress from nesosilicates to sorosilicates
(double nesosilicates) to triple nesosilicates to single-chain inosilicates,
the oxygen-to-silicon ratios become smaller and smaller
and there are fewer and fewer metals, such as iron and magnesium, chemically
bonded with the silicon atoms. This is
because more and more bonding sites of the silicon atoms are
occupied by silicon-oxygen covalent bonds that hold the entire molecular
structure of the mineral together, leaving fewer and fewer sites where metals
may bond with the silicon atoms. This
progression continues from single-chain inosilicates to double-chain
inosilicates to triple-chain inosilicates to single-sheet phyllosilicates. As more and more bonding sites of the silicon atoms are occupied by silicon-oxygen covalent bonds
that hold the entire molecular structure of the mineral together, there are
fewer and fewer sites where metals may bond with the silicon atoms. This progression continues from single-sheet
phyllosilicates to double-sheet phyllosilicates to triple-sheet phyllosilicates and ultimately to tectosilicates, which have the
lowest oxygen-to-silicon ratios and the least amount of metals, such as
iron and magnesium, chemically bonded with the silicon atoms. In particular, the tectosilicate mineral
quartz is the only silicate mineral that is pure silicon and oxygen, with no
other atoms such as metals within the chemical structure of this mineral.
The abundance of metals in
nesosilicates and sorosilicates gives these minerals
a darker color. Consequently, these
silicate minerals are called the dark silicates. The scarcity of metals in tectosilicates
gives these minerals a lighter color.
Consequently, these silicate minerals are called
the light silicates. In between these
two extremes are the inosilicates and the phyllosilicates, which have intermediate
amounts of metals giving them an intermediate color. Consequently, these silicate minerals are called the intermediate silicates. The abundance of metals within the dark
silicates also makes these minerals the most dense
among all silicates. The scarcity of
metals within the light silicates also makes these minerals the least dense
among all silicates. The intermediate
silicates have intermediate densities between these two extremes.
Suppose we begin with
tectosilicates and warm the temperature by adding thermal energy (heat). The added thermal energy (heat) breaks
chemical bonds. As we continue to make
the minerals warmer and warmer by adding more and more thermal energy (heat),
we break more and more chemical bonds.
Eventually, we have broken so many chemical bonds that we have destroyed
the three-dimensional structures of the tectosilicates, leaving two-dimensional
molecular sheets that are no longer bonded with one
another. By warming the temperature, we
have changed the tectosilicate into a collection of phyllosilicates. If we continue to add thermal energy (heat),
we continue to break chemical bonds.
Eventually, we have broken so many chemical bonds that we have destroyed
the two-dimensional structure of the phyllosilicates, leaving one-dimensional
molecular chains that are no longer bonded with one
another. By warming the temperature, we
have changed the phyllosilicates into a collection of inosilicates. If we continue to add thermal energy (heat),
we continue to break chemical bonds. Ultimately,
we have broken so many chemical bonds that we have destroyed the
one-dimensional structure of the inosilicates, leaving individual silicon atoms
that are no longer bonded with one another. By warming the temperature, we have changed
the inosilicates into a collection of nesosilicates. We deduce that the dark silicates
(nesosilicates and sorosilicates) have the hottest
melting temperatures, the light silicates (tectosilicates) have the lowest
melting temperatures, and the intermediate silicates (inosilicates and
phyllosilicates) have intermediate melting temperatures. We may confirm this progression of melting
temperatures by beginning with nesosilicates and cooling the temperature by
extracting thermal energy (heat). The
extraction of thermal energy (heat) forms chemical bonds. As we continue to make the minerals cooler
and cooler by extracting more and more thermal energy (heat), we form more and
more chemical bonds. Eventually, we have
formed so many chemical bonds that we no longer have individual silicon atoms
that are separate from one another; we now have one-dimensional molecular
chains of silicon-oxygen bonds. By
cooling the temperature, we have changed the nesosilicates into inosilicates. If we continue to extract thermal energy (heat),
we continue to form chemical bonds.
Eventually, we have formed so many chemical bonds that we no longer have
inosilicates that are separate from one another; we now have two-dimensional
molecular sheets of silicon-oxygen bonds.
By cooling the temperature, we have changed the inosilicates into
phyllosilicates. If we continue to
extract thermal energy (heat), we continue to form chemical bonds. Ultimately, we have formed so many chemical
bonds that we no longer have phyllosilicates that are separate from one
another; we now have three-dimensional molecular structures of silicon-oxygen
bonds. By cooling the temperature, we
have changed the phyllosilicates into tectosilicates. Again, we deduce that the dark silicates
(nesosilicates and sorosilicates) have the hottest
melting temperatures, light silicates (tectosilicates) have the lowest melting
temperatures, and intermediate silicates (inosilicates and phyllosilicates)
have intermediate melting temperatures.
In summary, most silicate
minerals can be subdivided into three subcategories:
the dark silicates, the intermediate silicates, and the light silicates. At one extreme, the dark silicates have the
most amount of metals such as iron and magnesium chemically bonded with the
silicon atoms, which themselves bond to each other with oxygen atoms between
them. This abundance of metals give
these dark silicates a darker color, hence their name. This abundance of metals also makes the dark
silicates the most dense silicates. Dark silicates also have the warmest melting
temperatures and the highest oxygen-to-silicon ratios. Caution: dark silicates have the least complex chemical structure. The dark silicates include nesosilicates,
such as olivines and garnets, and sorosilicates,
such as epidotes. At the opposite
extreme, the light silicates have the least amount of metals chemically bonded
with the silicon atoms, which themselves bond to each other with oxygen atoms
between them. This scarcity of metals
gives these light silicates a lighter color, hence their name. This scarcity of metals also makes the light
silicates the least dense silicates.
Light silicates also have the coolest melting temperatures and the
lowest oxygen-to-silicon ratios.
Caution: light silicates have the most
complex chemical structure. The light
silicates include tectosilicates, such as zeolites, feldspars, and quartz. The intermediate silicates are in between
these two extremes, with an intermediate amount of metals, an intermediate
color, intermediate densities, intermediate melting temperatures, intermediate
oxygen-to-silicon ratios, and intermediate chemical complexity. The intermediate silicates include
inosilicates, such as pyroxenes and amphiboles, and phyllosilicates, such as
serpentines and micas. In brief, most
silicate minerals can be categorized into a
spectrum. At one extreme, the dark
silicates have the greatest abundance of metals, the darkest color, the highest
densities, the warmest melting temperatures, the highest oxygen-to-silicon
ratios, and the least complex
chemical structure. At the other
extreme, the light silicates have the least abundance of metals, the lightest
color, the lowest densities, the coolest melting temperatures, the lowest
oxygen-to-silicon ratios, and the most
complex chemical structure. The
intermediate silicates are in between these two extremes.
Consider an organic molecule
where a carbon atom covalently bonds to another carbon atom
which covalently bonds to another carbon atom which covalently bonds to
another carbon atom and so on and so forth, but ultimately the last carbon atom
covalently bonds back to the first carbon atom.
These rings of carbon-carbon covalent bonds (also bonded with other
atoms) are the cycloalkane organic molecules.
Once again, there are silicate minerals analogous to these organic
molecules, providing further evidence that life could hypothetically evolve
based on inorganic silicate minerals instead of organic molecules. Consider a silicate mineral
where a silicon atom covalently bonds to another silicon atom (with an oxygen
atom between them of course) which covalently bonds to another silicon atom
(with an oxygen atom between them of course) which covalently bonds to another
silicon atom (with an oxygen atom between them of course) and so on and so forth,
but ultimately the last silicon atom covalently bonds back to the first silicon
atom (with an oxygen atom between them of course). These rings of silicon-oxygen covalent bonds
(also bonded with other atoms) are the cyclosilicates. Examples of cyclosilicates
include three-silicon rings such as the benitoites,
four-silicon rings such as the axinites, and
six-silicon rings such as the beryls and the
tourmalines.
The vast majority of all
minerals are silicate minerals, but there are other mineral groups as well. The sulfates are the mineral group where the
sulfur-oxygen tetrahedral group SO42– bonds with metals.
Caution: the chemical symbol of silicon is Si, while the chemical symbol
of sulfur is S. Examples of sulfate
minerals include gypsum with chemical name calcium sulfate CaSO4,
anglesite with chemical name lead sulfate PbSO4,
and thenardite with chemical name sodium sulfate Na2SO4. Yet another sulfate mineral is epsomite with chemical name magnesium sulfate MgSO4.
The sulfate mineral epsomite has a low Mohs
scale hardness and hence can be easily crumbled into a powder that is commonly
known as epsom salt, often used as a bathing
salt. The carbonates are the mineral
group where the carbon-oxygen trigonal planar group CO32– bonds with metals.
Examples of carbonate minerals include calcite with chemical name
calcium carbonate CaCO3, magnesite with
chemical name magnesium carbonate MgCO3,
and dolomite with chemical name calcium magnesium carbonate CaMg(CO3)2. The carbonate mineral dolomite is named for the French geologist Déodat
de Dolomieu who discovered and studied this
mineral. Another carbonate mineral is smithsonite with chemical name zinc carbonate ZnCO3 and commonly known as zinc spar. The carbonate mineral smithsonite
is named for the British mineralogist James Smithson
who studied this mineral. James Smithson
was also the founding donor of the Smithsonian Institution, named for this
British mineralogist. Yet another
carbonate mineral is nahcolite with chemical name
sodium bicarbonate NaHCO3. This mineral is amusingly
named after its chemical formula.
Nahcolite has a low Mohs scale hardness and
hence can be easily crumbled into a powder that is
commonly known as baking soda. The
oxides are the mineral group where oxygen bonds with metals, such as iron
oxides, aluminum oxides, and copper oxides.
Examples of iron oxide minerals include hematite with chemical name
ferric oxide Fe2O3, magnetite
with chemical name ferrous-ferric oxide Fe3O4,
and wüstite with chemical name ferrous oxide FeO. Iron oxides are commonly known as rust, although this common designation
is often specifically used for hematite.
An example of an aluminum oxide mineral is corundum with chemical name dialuminium trioxide Al2O3,
and examples of copper oxide minerals include cuprite with chemical name
cuprous oxide Cu2O and tenorite
with chemical name cupric oxide CuO. Whereas iron oxide minerals are often red in
color, copper oxide minerals are often green in color. This is the reason the Statue of Liberty is
green. This giant statue in New York
Harbor is made of copper, and copper is actually goldish orange in color. Although the original color of the Statue of
Liberty was indeed goldish orange from the 1880s to
the 1890s, the outer layers of its copper gradually
oxidized. More and more green splotches
appeared on the Statue of Liberty until it was entirely green within twenty
years after it was first built. These surface layers of green copper oxide
actually protect the Statue of Liberty from corrosion. The halides are the mineral group where
halogens such as fluorine, chlorine, bromine, and iodine bond with metals. An important example of a halide mineral is
halite with chemical name sodium chloride NaCl and
commonly known as rock salt. This
mineral has a low Mohs scale hardness and hence can be easily
crumbled into a power that is commonly known as table salt. Other examples of halide minerals include
fluorite with chemical name calcium fluoride CaF2,
bromargyrite with chemical name silver bromide AgBr, marshite with chemical name
cuprous iodide CuI, and sylvite
with chemical name potassium chloride KCl. The halide mineral sylvite
is named for the Dutch scientist Franciscus
Sylvius. Yet
another halide mineral is villiaumite with chemical
name sodium fluoride NaF, often used as one of the
active ingredients in toothpaste. The
sulfides are the mineral group where sulfur bonds with metals. Caution: when the sulfur-oxygen tetrahedral
group SO42– bonds
with metals, the mineral is classified as a sulfate,
not as a sulfide. The most abundant
sulfide mineral is pyrite with chemical name iron disulfide FeS2
and commonly known as fool’s gold, since this mineral happens to have a similar
color and a similar luster as gold and hence pyrite is often mistaken for
gold. Other examples of sulfide minerals
include sphalerite with chemical name zinc sulfide ZnS, galena with chemical name lead sulfide PbS, and cinnabar with chemical
name mercury sulfide HgS. The native elements are the minerals composed
of a single type of metal. Examples of
native elements include pure aluminum, pure iron, pure nickel, pure copper,
pure zinc, pure silver, pure tin, pure platinum, pure gold, and pure lead. Caution: if a metal bonds with oxygen, the
mineral is classified as an oxide, not as a native
element. If a metal bonds with the
sulfur-oxygen tetrahedral group, the mineral is classified
as a sulfate, not as a native element.
If a metal bonds with the carbon-oxygen trigonal planar group, the
mineral is classified as a carbonate, not as a native
element. If a metal bonds with a
halogen, the mineral is classified as a halide, not as
a native element. If a metal bonds with
sulfur, the mineral is classified as a sulfide, not as
a native element, and so on and so forth.
The term gemstone (or gem for
short) does not have a strict scientific definition. We may casually define a gemstone (or gem) as
either a mineral or a rock that after cutting and polishing becomes
economically valuable due to its beautiful appearance. Historically, the most economically valuable
gemstones (or gems) have been pearls, amethysts, emeralds, rubies, sapphires,
and diamonds. Hence, these six gemstones
are called the primary (or cardinal) gems. Natural pearls are forms of the carbonate
mineral calcite made by shelled mollusks such as oysters, clams, and
mussels. After natural pearls are
polished, the corresponding gemstone is also called a
pearl. Amethysts are forms of the
tectosilicate mineral quartz. Although
quartz is strictly pure silicon and oxygen, small amounts of metallic
impurities within quartz may give it a beautiful violet color, which after
cutting and polishing becomes an amethyst.
Emeralds are forms of the cyclosilicate
mineral beryl. Small amounts of metallic
impurities within beryl may give it a beautiful green color, which after
cutting and polishing becomes an emerald.
Rubies and sapphires are forms of the aluminum oxide mineral
corundum. If small amounts of metallic
impurities within corundum give it a beautiful red color, then it becomes a ruby
after cutting and polishing. If small
amounts of metallic impurities within corundum give it a beautiful blue color,
then it becomes a sapphire after cutting and polishing. As we discussed, the mineral diamond is one
of the mineral forms of carbon and is the most hard
mineral on the Mohs scale. After the
mineral diamond is cut and polished, the corresponding
gemstone is also called a diamond.
Petrology
Petrology is the study of
rocks, and a petrologist is someone who studies rocks. These words are derived
from the Greek root petro- for rock. For
example, the name Peter means rock. A
rock is defined as a naturally occurring solid
inorganic object that is an aggregate (a mixture) of minerals. Since a rock is an aggregate (a mixture) of
many different minerals, a rock does not have a definite chemical
structure. This is the most important
difference between a rock and a mineral.
Both minerals and rocks are naturally occurring solid inorganic
objects. However, a mineral has a
definite chemical structure, while a rock does not have a definite chemical
structure, since a rock is an aggregate (a mixture) of minerals. Since a rock does not have a definite
chemical structure, there are significant variations in density, composition,
and other properties even for a particular type of rock. In other words, whereas a particular mineral
is unique, a particular rock is not unique.
Petrography is the classification of rocks, the study of different types
of rocks. Petrogenesis
is the study of how rocks form. Broadly speaking, there are three different ways that rocks can
form. Hence, there are three
broad categories of rocks: igneous rocks, sedimentary rocks, and metamorphic
rocks.
If we add sufficient heat to a
rock, it melts to become molten rock (liquid rock). If molten rock cools, it may crystallize
(solidify) back into solid rock. Any
rock that forms from the crystallization of molten rock is
called igneous rock, one of the three main types of rock. We can classify igneous rocks based on where
they form. Molten rock deep within the
Earth is called magma, while molten rock that has
extruded out of the Earth is called lava.
We will discuss shortly a significant difference between molten rock
deep within the Earth and molten rock that has extruded out of the Earth that
justifies using these two different terms, magma and lava. For now, we simply mention that different
names are often used for the same thing in colloquial
languages. While they are living animals,
chickens, turkeys, and ducks are called fowl, but
after they have been slaughtered and prepared as food they are called
poultry. While they are living animals,
bulls and cows are called cattle, but after they have
been slaughtered and prepared as food they are called beef. While they are living animals, pigs are
called swine, but after they have been slaughtered and prepared as food they are called pork.
While they are living animals, deer, elk, moose, and reindeer are called cervids, but after they
have been slaughtered and prepared as food they are called venison. The Spanish word for living fish is pez, but the Spanish word for fish that is
slaughtered and prepared as food is pescado. There are countless other examples in
colloquial languages. Magma that
crystallizes into solid rock is called intrusive
igneous rock, since it forms deep within the Earth. Lava that crystallizes into solid rock is called extrusive igneous rock, since it formed from lava
that extruded out of the Earth. Another term
for intrusive igneous rock is plutonic igneous rock, and another term for
extrusive igneous rock is volcanic igneous rock.
Since they form deep within
the Earth where it is hot, intrusive/plutonic igneous rocks typically take a
long time to cool and crystallize. This
slower, more gradual cooling builds large crystals throughout the rock. The result is a rock with a coarse-grained
texture, meaning that it feels more rough to the
touch. Since they form from lava that
has extruded out of the Earth, extrusive/volcanic igneous rocks typically take
a short time to cool and crystallize.
This faster, more rapid cooling only permits small crystals to be built throughout the rock. The result is a rock with a fine-grained
texture, meaning that it feels more smooth to the
touch. The term for the coarse-grained
texture of igneous rocks is phaneritic, since the
Greek root phanero- means visible, meaning that the
crystals in a phaneritic igneous rock are large
enough to be visible with the naked (unaided) eye. The term for the fine-grained texture of
igneous rocks is aphanitic, since again the Greek root phanero-
means visible and the Greek root a- means no or not in words such as apathy,
asynchronous, and asymmetrical for example.
In other words, the crystals in an aphanitic igneous rock are too small
to be visible with the naked (unaided) eye.
We require at least a magnifying glass, sometimes even a microscope, to
see the crystals in an igneous rock with an aphanitic texture. An igneous rock that takes an extremely long
time to cool and crystalize would have an extremely coarse-grained
texture. This extreme form of the phaneritic texture is called pegmatitic. An
igneous rock can take an extremely short time to cool and crystalize. This virtually instantaneous crystallization is called quenching.
In this case, the igneous rock has an extremely fine-grained
texture. This extreme form of the
aphanitic texture is called glassy, since the rock
feels as smooth as glass. The
extrusive/volcanic igneous rock obsidian has a glassy texture, since it forms
by quenching. Obsidian is often black in
color, which together with its glassy texture makes obsidian a beautiful
rock. After cutting and polishing,
obsidian is considered a type of gemstone (or
gem). The extrusive/volcanic igneous
rock pumice also has a glassy texture, since it forms by quenching. However, the abundance of vesicles (cavities)
within pumice causes this rock to feel rough to the touch, even though it has a
glassy texture. The abundance of vesicles
(cavities) within pumice also gives this rock a density that is usually less
than liquid water, permitting this rock to float in liquid water. In summary, igneous rocks
that take an extremely long time to cool and crystallize have a pegmatitic (extremely coarse-grained) texture, igneous
rocks that take a moderately long time to cool and crystallize have a phaneritic (moderately coarse-grained) texture, igneous
rocks that take a moderately short time to cool and crystallize have an
aphanitic (moderately fine-grained) texture, and igneous rocks that take an
extremely short time to cool and crystallize (quenching) have a glassy
(extremely fine-grained) texture.
Typically, extrusive/volcanic igneous rocks have an aphanitic texture,
perhaps even glassy in extreme cases, since they take a short amount of time to
cool and crystallize. Typically,
intrusive/plutonic igneous rocks have a phaneritic
texture, perhaps even pegmatitic in extreme cases,
since they take a long amount of time to cool and crystallize. In brief, we can calculate the cooling
history of an igneous rock (how long it took the rock to form) by simply
feeling its texture, whether it feels more rough to
the touch (coarse-grained texture) or more smooth to the touch (fine-grained
texture). Caution: some igneous rocks
have both large crystals and small crystals in the same rock. This occurs when there is an interruption in
the cooling history of the rock. This
unusual texture is called porphyritic. The large crystals in a porphyritic igneous
rock are called the phenocrysts,
while the small crystals in a porphyritic igneous rock are called the
groundmass.
We can also classify igneous
rocks based on their mineral composition.
Since the vast majority of all minerals are silicates, we classify igneous
rocks based on their silicate mineral composition. Igneous rocks that are
composed predominantly of dark silicates are called mafic igneous
rocks. The word mafic is a combination
of the words magnesium and ferrum, the Latin word for
iron. As we discussed, dark silicates
have the most amount of metals such as iron and magnesium. Igneous rocks that are
composed predominantly of light silicates are called felsic igneous
rocks. The word felsic is a combination
of the words feldspar and silica, the term for molten quartz. As we discussed, feldspar and quartz are two
examples of light silicates. Igneous
rocks that are composed predominantly of intermediate
silicates are simply called intermediate igneous rocks. Everything we have discussed about silicate
minerals therefore also applies to the igneous rocks that they compose. In particular, mafic igneous rocks have the
most amount of metals, are darkest in color, are most dense, and have the
hottest melting temperatures, while felsic igneous rocks have the least amount
of metals, are lightest in color, are least dense, and have the lowest melting
temperatures. Intermediate igneous rocks
are between these two extremes. The Bowen
reaction series quantifies the melting-temperature spectrum for igneous rocks,
named for the Canadian petrologist Norman L. Bowen who discovered this
progression of melting temperatures for igneous rocks in the early twentieth
century. According to the Bowen reaction
series, as we add more and more heat to igneous rocks, felsic rocks melt first,
intermediate rocks then melt at somewhat hotter temperatures, and finally mafic
rocks melt at the hottest temperatures.
Conversely, if we extract more and more heat from molten rock, mafic
rocks crystallize first, intermediate rocks then crystallize at somewhat lower
temperatures, and finally felsic igneous rocks crystallize at the lowest
temperatures.
The two most important mafic
igneous rocks are basalt and gabbro.
Both basalt and gabbro have large quantities of metals, are dark in color,
have high densities, and have hot melting temperatures. The only difference between basalt and gabbro
is where they form and thus their cooling histories and hence their textures. Gabbro forms intrusively/plutonically
deep within the Earth and therefore cools and crystallizes over a long period of time. Thus,
gabbro forms with large crystals resulting in a coarse-grained (rough)
texture. Basalt forms extrusively/volcanically on the surface of the Earth and
therefore cools and crystallizes over a short period of time. Thus, basalt forms small crystals resulting
in a fine-grained (smooth) texture. In
other words, gabbro is the intrusive/plutonic form of basalt, or basalt is the
extrusive/volcanic form of gabbro. The
two most important felsic igneous rocks are rhyolite and granite. Both rhyolite and granite have small
quantities of metals, are light in color, have low densities, and have low
melting temperatures. The only
difference between rhyolite and granite is where they form and thus their cooling
histories and hence their textures.
Granite forms intrusively/plutonically deep
within the Earth and therefore cools and crystallizes over a long period of time. Thus,
granite forms with large crystals resulting in a coarse-grained (rough)
texture. Rhyolite forms extrusively/volcanically on the surface of the Earth and
therefore cools and crystallizes over a short period of time. Thus, rhyolite forms small crystals resulting
in a fine-grained (smooth) texture. In
other words, granite is the intrusive/plutonic form of rhyolite, or rhyolite is
the extrusive/volcanic form of granite.
The two most important intermediate igneous rocks are andesite and
diorite. Both andesite and diorite have
intermediate quantities of metals, are intermediate in color, have intermediate
densities, and have intermediate melting temperatures. The only difference between andesite and
diorite is where they form and thus their cooling histories and hence their
textures. Diorite forms intrusively/plutonically deep within the Earth and therefore cools and
crystallizes over a long period of time. Thus, diorite forms with large crystals
resulting in a coarse-grained (rough) texture.
Andesite forms extrusively/volcanically on the
surface of the Earth and therefore cools and crystallizes over a short period of time. Thus,
andesite forms small crystals resulting in a fine-grained (smooth)
texture. In other words, diorite is the
intrusive/plutonic form of andesite, or andesite is the extrusive/volcanic form
of diorite.
Rocks on the surface of the
Earth are subjected to wind, rain, and other natural forces that degrade
(weaken and destroy) the rocks, ultimately breaking them into small pieces
called sediments. These natural forces
also move these sediments from one location to another. Layer upon layer of sediments may accumulate
at a particular location until the weight of the sediments begins to compress
the sediments. Chemical reactions may
cement the sediments together.
Eventually, the sediments become lithified,
meaning that they have become rock. Any
rock that forms from the lithification of sediment is called sedimentary rock, one of the three main types of
rock. Sedimentary rocks are classified into three subcategories: clastic sedimentary
rocks, chemical sedimentary rocks, and biogenic sedimentary rocks.
A clastic sedimentary rock
lithifies through the action of physical forces. If large sediments are
lithified to form a clastic sedimentary rock, then the rock will have a
coarse-grained texture, meaning that it will feel rough to the touch. If small sediments are
lithified to form a clastic sedimentary rock, then the rock will have a
fine-grained texture, meaning that it will feel smooth to the touch. The Wentworth scale is a sediment size scale,
named for the American geologist Chester K. Wentworth who defined this scale in
the year 1922. According to the
Wentworth scale, sediments are classified as gravels,
sands, silts, or clay/mud based on their size.
The largest sediments are gravels, which lithify into extremely
coarse-grained clastic sedimentary rocks, either conglomerate (if the
sediments are rounded) or breccia (if the sediments are angular). Sands are somewhat smaller sediments that
lithify into the moderately coarse-grained clastic sedimentary rock sandstone. Silts are even smaller sediments that lithify
into the moderately fine-grained clastic sedimentary rock siltstone. Finally, the smallest sediments are clay/mud,
which lithify into the extremely fine-grained clastic sedimentary rock shale.
Whenever natural forces degrade (weaken and destroy) rocks, the resulting sediments
always form with irregular, jagged shapes.
The technical term for this irregular, jagged shape is angular. If the sediments are eroded
(moved) over a far distance, the sediments collide with each other. These collisions tend to smooth out the
shapes of sediments. Liquid water and
even water vapor in the air will also contribute to the smoothing of the shapes
of the sediments if they are eroded (moved) over a far
distance. The technical term for this
smoothed shape is rounded. If the
sediments are eroded (moved) over a short distance,
the sediments do not have the opportunity to collide with each other
significantly, which would have smoothed out their shapes. Also, liquid water
as well as water vapor in the air will also not have much opportunity to smooth
out the shapes of the sediments if they are eroded (moved) over a short
distance. Thus, the sediments retain
their original angular shape. In
summary, we can calculate the distance (from how far away) sediments were
eroded (moved) from the shape of the sediments, whether the shape is angular
(more irregular or jagged) or rounded (more smooth). For example, the clastic sedimentary rock
conglomerate is lithified from gravels with more
rounded shapes, while the clastic sedimentary rock breccia is lithified from
gravels with more angular shapes.
Therefore, we conclude that the gravels that lithified to form
conglomerate were eroded (moved) over a far distance,
while the gravels that lithified to form breccia were eroded (moved) over a
short distance.
Some clastic sedimentary
rocks are lithified from poorly sorted sediments, meaning that the sediments
are all different sizes (some large and some small). Some clastic sedimentary rocks are lithified
from well sorted sediments, meaning that the sediments
are all roughly the same size (all small).
This sorting of sediments within a clastic sedimentary rock reveals the
energy of the natural forces that eroded (moved) the sediment. A major river has a large quantity of energy,
meaning that a major river is able to erode (move) large sediments and
certainly small sediments. Hence, the
resulting clastic sedimentary rocks will be poorly sorted. Conversely, a small stream has a small
quantity of energy, meaning that a small stream is only able to erode (move)
small sediments. Hence, the resulting
clastic sedimentary rocks will be well sorted. As we will discuss later in the course, a
glacier is a giant mass of ice with tremendous energy. Hence, a glacier is able to move giant
boulders in addition to small sediments.
Hence, the resulting clastic sedimentary rocks will be
poorly sorted if the sediments were eroded (moved) by a glacier. As we will discuss shortly, we can determine
the history of the Earth from rocks, in particular from sedimentary rocks. Our current discussion already reveals how
this is possible. By studying the
sorting of sediments within a clastic sedimentary rock, we can actually
determine the history of the surrounding landscape. For example, the sorting of sediments within
a clastic sedimentary rock may reveal that perhaps there was a small stream in
a particular landscape followed by perhaps an ice age with glaciers followed by
perhaps a major river, and so on and so forth.
A chemical sedimentary rock
lithifies through the process of chemical reactions. One example of a chemical sedimentary rock is
limestone, which is the lithification of the
carbonate mineral calcite. Another
example of a chemical sedimentary rock is dolostone,
which is the lithification of the carbonate mineral
dolomite. Yet another example of a
chemical sedimentary rock is chert, which is the lithification of the tectosilicate mineral quartz.
A biogenic sedimentary rock is lithified from organic materials (lifeforms) together
with inorganic sediments. Chalk,
coquina, and bituminous coal are three common examples of biogenic sedimentary
rocks. The biogenic sedimentary rock
chalk forms from the lithification of microscopic
ocean plankton. Caution: the chalk that is used to write on chalkboards is artificially manufactured
from the minerals gypsum and calcite.
The chalkboards themselves are manufactured
from slate, which is another type of rock that we will discuss shortly. Coquina is a gorgeous biogenic sedimentary
rock that is lithified from many different types of
shells from various invertebrate animals.
The formation of the biogenic sedimentary rock bituminous coal is as
follows. We begin with many layers of
dead plants that are compacted with clay/mud.
In addition to compacting the organic matter, the clay/mud also serves
to prevent the decomposition of the organic matter. Over thousands of years, the accumulation of
sediments over the organic matter compresses it to high densities until it is classified as peat.
As sedimentary rock continues to lithify over the peat, it is further compressed until it is classified as lignite (or
brown coal). If the lignite (or brown
coal) is compressed to even higher densities over
millions of years, it is eventually lithified to the biogenic sedimentary rock
bituminous coal. Note that if bituminous
coal continues to be subjected to high pressures, it may become anthracite,
which is another type of rock that we will discuss shortly. If anthracite is subjected
to further pressures, it may become graphite, one of the mineral forms of
carbon. Graphite is
used in writing utensils such as pencils. Note that the graphite in these writing
utensils is often incorrectly referred to as lead
because humans used to write with lead, which no one should do since lead is
poisonous! If the mineral graphite is
subjected to enormous pressures over millions of years, it is compressed to
diamond, another mineral form of carbon that is the most hard
mineral on the Mohs scale, as we discussed.
Lignite (or brown coal), bituminous coal, and anthracite are all
particular examples of fossil fuels. All
fossil fuels can be divided into three broad
categories: petroleum (crude oil), natural gas, and coal. Natural gas forms when particular
microorganisms that generate methane are compacted under modest pressures over
millions of years. As we discussed, coal
forms when plants are compacted under high pressures over millions of years. Geologists continue to debate how petroleum
(crude oil) forms. Older theories
claimed that petroleum (crude oil) forms over millions of years like coal and
natural gas, but some modern theories claim that petroleum (crude oil) can form
in only a few decades. One form of
petroleum is bitumen, which is also called
asphalt. However, the word asphalt is colloquially used for an artificially manufactured
substance that is a mixture of bitumen and various minerals. This manufactured substance should be called asphalt concrete (or asphalt cement) to
distinguish it from naturally occurring asphalt, which should itself be called
bitumen to avoid confusion with asphalt concrete (or asphalt cement).
Heat, pressure, and chemical
reactions can gradually change one rock into a completely new rock. Any rock that forms by changing a
pre-existing rock is called a metamorphic rock, one of
the three main types of rock. The
original rock is called the parent rock, while the new
metamorphic rock that formed from the parent rock is called the daughter rock. Contact metamorphism is the process by which
metamorphic rocks form primarily from heat, with pressure and chemical
reactions being less important processes.
Regional metamorphism is the process by which metamorphic rocks form
primarily from pressure, with heat and chemical reactions being less important
processes. Hydrothermal metamorphism is
the process by which metamorphic rocks form primarily from chemical reactions,
with heat and pressure being less important processes. The adjective hydrothermal is derived from
the Greek root hydro- meaning water, since the chemicals are almost
always dissolved within water.
Metamorphic rocks can be subclassified based on
their shape. Metamorphic rocks that have
a folded shape resulting from asymmetrical regional metamorphism (asymmetrical
pressures) are called foliated metamorphic rocks, while metamorphic rocks that
do not have a folded shape are called non-foliated metamorphic rocks. Non-foliated metamorphic rocks may form from
symmetrical regional metamorphism (symmetrical pressures), but non-foliated
metamorphic rocks may also form from contact metamorphism (heat) or from
hydrothermal metamorphism (chemical reactions).
If we begin with siltstone or shale as the parent rock and apply
asymmetrical pressures, the result is the daughter rock slate, a foliated
metamorphic rock. We can begin with
slate itself as the parent rock and apply further asymmetrical pressures to
yield the daughter rock phyllite, a more severely
foliated metamorphic rock. We can begin
with phyllite as the parent rock and apply even
further asymmetrical pressures to yield the daughter rock schist, an even more
severely foliated metamorphic rock. We
can begin with schist as the parent rock and continue to apply asymmetrical
pressures to yield the daughter rock gneiss, a severely foliated metamorphic
rock. If we begin with the biogenic
sedimentary rock bituminous coal as the parent rock and apply symmetrical
pressures, the result is the daughter rock anthracite, a non-foliated
metamorphic rock. Another non-foliated
metamorphic rock is marble, the daughter rock to the chemical sedimentary rocks
limestone and dolostone. Yet another non-foliated metamorphic rock is
quartzite, the daughter rock to the clastic sedimentary rock sandstone. Another non-foliated metamorphic rock is hornfels, the daughter rock to the clastic sedimentary rock
shale.
Metamorphic rocks that form
deep within the Earth may be subjected to sufficient
heat to melt them. That molten rock may
later cool and crystallize into an igneous rock. Metamorphic rocks may also
be thrust to the surface of the Earth by a violent event, such as an
earthquake. This metamorphic rock would
now be subjected to wind, rain, and other natural forces that will degrade
(weaken and destroy) the rock, ultimately breaking it into sediments, which may
later lithify into a sedimentary rock.
An intrusive/plutonic igneous rock that formed deep within the Earth is subjected to heat, pressure, and chemical reactions that
may gradually change the igneous rock into a metamorphic rock. Sedimentary rocks can be
thrust to the deep interior of the Earth by a violent event, such as an
earthquake. These sedimentary rocks could now be subjected to sufficient heat to melt them, and
that molten rock may later cool and crystallize into an igneous rock. In summary, rocks are continuously changing
from one type to another, and any rock can become any other type of rock. The principle that rocks are continuously
changing from one type to any other type is called the
rock cycle. It is difficult for us to
believe that the rock cycle actually occurs, since in most cases we do not
witness rocks change before our eyes.
Most rocks change very slowly over long periods of
time, although there are rare cases when we can witness before our very
eyes rocks forming in a short period of time, such as quenching resulting in
igneous rocks with a glassy texture.
Throughout this course, we will discuss innumerable manifestations of
our dynamic planet Earth. The word
dynamic means continuously changing. The
opposite of the word dynamic is the word static, meaning not changing. Our planet Earth is not static. Our planet Earth is dynamic since the Earth
is continuously changing, and the rock cycle is one of the many processes we
will discuss in this course that reveals that our planet Earth is dynamic.
If heat changes a parent rock
into a metamorphic daughter rock, that heat must not melt the rock. If the rock were to melt and recrystallize
into a solid rock, then we must classify the rock as an igneous rock, not as a
metamorphic rock. The rock migmatite forms from heat that melts some parts of the rock which then recrystallize into solid rock, but the heat
also changes other parts of the rock without melting those parts of the rock. Some petrologists classify migmatite as igneous, while other petrologists classify migmatite as metamorphic.
Still other petrologists classify migmatite as
both igneous and metamorphic, and yet other petrologists actually place migmatite in a unique category of rock that is intermediate
between igneous and metamorphic. There
will never be a consensus among petrologists on the classification of migmatite.
Therefore, migmatite is a rock that cannot be classified.
We now realize that not all rocks can be classified
as either igneous, sedimentary, or metamorphic.
As another example, the rock tuff partly forms from the crystallization
of molten rock and partly forms from the lithification
of sediment. Some petrologists classify
tuff as igneous, while other petrologists classify tuff as sedimentary. Still other petrologists classify tuff as
both igneous and sedimentary, and yet other petrologists actually place tuff in
a unique category of rock that is intermediate between igneous and
sedimentary. Again, there will never be
a consensus among petrologists on the classification of tuff. Therefore, tuff is another rock that cannot be classified.
A more subtle example is the sedimentary rock marlstone, which is
intermediate between the sedimentary rocks limestone and shale. Although both limestone and shale are
sedimentary rocks and therefore marlstone is also a
sedimentary rock, limestone is a chemical sedimentary rock while shale is a
clastic sedimentary rock. Therefore,
marlstone is a sedimentary rock that is intermediate between chemical
sedimentary and clastic sedimentary.
There will never be a consensus among petrologists on the precise
classification of marlstone. Therefore,
marlstone is yet another rock that cannot be classified.
The Structure and the Composition of the Geosphere
The Earth is
mostly covered with oceans, while a small fraction of the surface of the
Earth is continents. The continents are
composed of mostly felsic igneous rock, for reasons we will make clear shortly. On the surface of the continents is a thin
layer of sedimentary rock, having formed from the lithification
of sediments that themselves formed from natural forces degrading rocks into
sediments. Therefore, if we were to
drill into the continent, we would first drill through a layer of sedimentary
rock followed by rhyolite (extrusive/volcanic felsic rock, having crystallized
near the surface of the Earth) followed by granite (intrusive/plutonic felsic
rock, having crystallized deep within the Earth). The ocean basins (at the bottom of the ocean)
are composed of mostly mafic igneous rock, for reasons we will make clear
shortly. On the surface of the ocean
basins (at the bottom of the ocean) is a thin layer of sedimentary rock, having
formed from the lithification of sediments that
themselves formed from natural forces degrading rocks into sediments. Therefore, if we were to drill into the ocean
basins (at the bottom of the ocean), we would first drill through a layer of
sedimentary rock followed by basalt (extrusive/volcanic mafic rock, having
crystallized near the surface of the Earth) followed by gabbro
(intrusive/plutonic mafic rock, having crystallized deep within the Earth).
The geosphere (the solid part
of the Earth) is layered. The most dense layer
of the geosphere is the core at its center.
The core is composed primarily of metals, such as iron and nickel. The next layer of the geosphere surrounding
the core is the mantle, which is less dense than the core. The mantle is composed primarily of rock,
which is itself composed primarily of silicate minerals. There are also fair amounts of metals in the
mantle, such as iron. In summary, the
mantle is composed of iron-rich silicate rock.
The outermost layer of the geosphere surrounding the mantle is the
crust. The crust is the least dense
layer of the geosphere and the thinnest layer of the geosphere. The crust is also composed of silicate rock,
but there are fewer metals such as iron in the crust as compared with the
mantle. Therefore, the crust is composed
of iron-poor silicate rock.
The Earth’s core is itself
layered. At the very center of the
geosphere is the inner core, composed primarily of metals such as iron and
nickel. The temperature of the Earth’s core
is very hot, for reasons we will discuss shortly. These hot temperatures should be sufficient
to melt metals into the molten state.
However, the pressure of the inner core is so enormous that the metals are compressed into the solid state even though they are at
temperatures where they should be in the molten state. Since the inner core is composed of solid
metal, the inner core is also called the solid
core. The layer around the solid (inner)
core is the outer core, which is also composed primarily of metals such as iron
and nickel. Again, the temperature of
the outer core is sufficiently hot to melt metals into the molten state. Although the pressure of the outer core is
enormous by human standards, the pressure is nevertheless not as high as the
pressure of the inner core. Therefore,
the pressure of the outer core is not sufficient to compress metals into the
solid state. The outer core is therefore
molten, as metals should be at these hot temperatures. Since the outer core is composed of molten
metal, the outer core is also called the molten
core. Surrounding the molten (outer)
core is the first layer of the mantle: the mesosphere. The Greek root meso-
means middle. For example, Central
America is sometimes called Mesoamerica, as in Middle
America. Therefore, the word mesosphere
simply means middle sphere or middle layer.
The next layer of the mantle that surrounds the mesosphere is the
asthenosphere. This layer of the mantle
is composed of weak rock. Indeed, the
Greek root astheno- means weak. The asthenosphere is composed of weak rock
that is still mostly solid, although parts of the asthenosphere are composed of
rock that is partially molten. Finally, the rest of the mantle together with
the entire crust is called the lithosphere. The lithosphere is of varying thickness. Some parts of the lithosphere are so thick
that they protrude out of the oceans.
These thick parts of the lithosphere are called
continents. The parts of the lithosphere
that are thin are the ocean basins at the bottom of the ocean.
Since density is defined as mass divided by volume, density is inversely
proportional to volume. Therefore, more
dense rock must occupy a smaller volume, while less dense rock must occupy a
larger volume. Some parts of the
lithosphere are so thick that they protrude out of the oceans; these are the
continents. Since the continental parts
of the lithosphere are thick occupying a larger volume, they must be composed
of less dense rock. This reveals why the
continents are composed primarily of felsic rock, since felsic rock is the
least dense igneous rock. Other parts of
the lithosphere are so thin that they do not protrude out of the ocean; these
are the ocean basins at the bottom of the ocean. Since the oceanic parts of the lithosphere
are thin occupying a smaller volume, they must be composed of more dense
rock. This reveals why the ocean basins
are composed primarily of mafic rock, since mafic rock is the most dense igneous rock.
How have geophysicists
determined the layers of the geosphere, their thicknesses, their compositions
(metal or rock), and their physical states (solid or molten)? It is a common misconception that we have
drilled to the center of the Earth and directly studied the interior of the
Earth. This is false. We have come nowhere near drilling to the
center of the Earth. We have not even
drilled through the Earth’s crust, which is by far the thinnest layer of the
geosphere. We will never have technology
advanced enough to drill far beyond the crust, and reaching the core is out of
the question. Geophysicists have
determined the layers of the geosphere, their thicknesses, their compositions
(metal or rock), and their physical states (solid or molten) using seismic
waves. We will discuss earthquakes in
more detail shortly. For now, earthquakes
cause waves that propagate (travel) throughout the entire geosphere. These waves are called
seismic waves, and a seismometer is a device that detects seismic waves. There are millions of earthquakes on planet
Earth every day, as we will discuss shortly.
Most earthquakes are so weak that humans cannot feel them, but
seismometers sensitive (accurate) enough can detect incredibly weak seismic
waves. Geophysicists have placed thousands
of seismometers all over planet Earth to detect these seismic waves. Surface seismic waves propagate (travel) along
the surface of the geosphere, while body seismic waves propagate (travel)
throughout the interior of the geosphere.
There are two different types of body seismic waves: pressure waves and
shear-stress waves. A pressure is a
force exerted directly onto (perpendicularly onto) an area. Consequently, a pressure wave can propagate
(travel) through solids, liquids, and even gases, since all that is necessary
for a pressure wave to propagate is for atoms or molecules to collide with
other atoms or molecules in the direction of propagation. A shear-stress is a
force exerted along (parallel across) an area.
Consequently, a shear-stress wave can propagate (travel) through solids
but not through liquids or gases, since there must be strong chemical bonding
for atoms or molecules to pull other atoms or molecules along (parallel across)
an area. Also,
pressure waves propagate faster than shear-stress waves. Therefore, a seismometer will always detect
pressure waves first. For this reason,
pressure waves are also called primary waves. A seismometer will always detect shear-stress
waves second, since they propagate slower than pressure (primary) waves. For this reason, shear-stress waves are also called secondary waves. By an amazing coincidence, the words pressure
and primary both begin with the same letter.
Therefore, these waves are also called
P-waves. By another amazing coincidence,
the words shear, stress, and secondary also all begin with the same
letter! Therefore, these waves are also called S-waves.
We can calculate how distant an earthquake occurred from a seismometer
from the arrival times of the P-waves and the S-waves. If a seismometer detects the S-waves a long
duration of time after the P-waves, the earthquake must have occurred far from
the seismometer, since the P-waves had sufficient distance to propagate
(travel) far ahead of the S-waves, resulting in a long delay between them. If the seismometer detects the S-waves
immediately after the P-waves, the earthquake must have occurred near the
seismometer, since the P-waves did not have sufficient distance to propagate
(travel) that far ahead of the S-waves, resulting in a short delay between
them. In summary, we calculate the
distance the seismic waves propagated from the arrival times of the P-waves and
the S-waves. We now have the distance of
propagation, and we certainly know the time of propagation, since we know when
the earthquake occurred and when the seismometer detected the seismic waves. We can then calculate the speed of the seismic
waves, since the speed of anything equals its distance traveled divided by its
time of travel. Once we have the speed
of the seismic waves, we can determine the properties of the materials that
would cause that speed of propagation, whether the material was solid metal,
molten metal, solid rock, or molten rock.
We can program a computer with all of these data, and the computer can
calculate the layers of the geosphere, their thicknesses, their compositions (metal
or rock), and their physical states (solid or molten) from all of these
data. Also, we
are certain that the interior of the Earth is at least partially molten, since
seismometers on the opposite side of planet Earth from an earthquake do not
detect S-waves; these seismometers only detect P-waves. As we discussed, S-waves cannot propagate
through liquids; they can only propagate through solids. However, P-waves can propagate through either
solids or liquids, as we discussed. The
opposite side of planet Earth from any earthquake is called
the shadow zones of that particular earthquake.
This term comes from the idea that the molten (outer) core casts a
shadow, preventing those seismometers from detecting S-waves. In actuality, the S-waves cannot propagate
through the molten (outer) core, while the P-waves can propagate through the
molten (outer) core. Hence, seismometers
in the shadow zones only detect P-waves from earthquakes on the opposite side
of planet Earth. In summary, by using
thousands of seismometers all over planet Earth that detect seismic waves from
millions of earthquakes each day and by running computer simulations,
geophysicists have determined the layers of the geosphere, their thicknesses,
their compositions, and their physical states.
One of the earliest examples of the successful use of these techniques
was when the Croatian geophysicist Andrija Mohorovičić
discovered the boundary between the crust and the mantle in the year 1909 using
seismic waves. Consequently, the
boundary between the crust and the mantle is called
the Mohorovičić discontinuity in his honor.
It cannot be accidental or
coincidental that the geosphere (the solid part of the Earth) is layered according to density. Why are the inner layers more dense and the
outer layers less dense? To explain this
layering, we must discuss the formation of the Earth. The Earth, its Moon, the other planets and
their moons, the Sun, and the entire Solar System formed roughly 4.6 billion
years ago. The four planets closer to the
Sun (Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars) were born as small, dense planetesimals (baby planets) that grew larger through
accretion, which is the gaining of mass through sticky collisions. During a sticky collision, a significant
fraction of the kinetic energy (moving energy) of the colliding objects is converted into thermal energy (heat energy). Thus, objects that suffer from sticky
collisions become significantly warmer.
Therefore, as the Earth was forming and growing larger through
accretion, it became warmer. Eventually,
the Earth became so hot that it became almost entirely molten. While the Earth was almost
entirely molten, more dense materials were able to sink toward the
center of the planet while less dense materials were able to rise toward the
surface of the planet. Most metals are more dense than most rocks.
That is, most rocks are less dense than most metals. Therefore, most of the metals sank toward the
center of the planet, forming the core.
Most of the rocks rose toward the surface of the planet, forming the
mantle and the crust. The process by
which any planet separates materials according to density is
called differentiation, and the planet is said to be
differentiated. A planet larger than the
Earth would be more severely differentiated than the Earth, since it would have
more mass and therefore stronger gravity that would
pull the metals towards the center of the planet more strongly. A planet smaller than the Earth would be less
severely differentiated than the Earth, since it would have less mass and
therefore weaker gravity that would pull the metals toward the center of the
planet less strongly. For example,
planet Mars is smaller than the Earth.
Therefore, Mars has less mass and thus weaker
gravity as compared with the Earth.
Hence, Mars is less severely differentiated as
compared with the Earth. Of course,
planet Mars is still differentiated. It
has a dense core composed primarily of metals such as iron, and it has less
dense outer layers composed primarily of rock.
Nevertheless, Mars is less severely differentiated
as compared with the Earth, meaning that not all of the metals sank toward the
center of Mars to form its core. This is
also the case with the Earth. Although
most of the metals sank toward the center of the Earth to form its core, there
are still fair amounts of metals in the mantle and small amounts of metals in
the crust. Since Mars is
less severely differentiated as compared with the Earth, we find more
iron on the surface of Mars as compared with the amount of iron on the surface
of the Earth. The abundance of iron on
the surface of Mars has oxidized. As we
discussed, iron oxide is commonly known as rust, which
has a reddish color. This is why Mars is
red. In fact, the nickname of planet
Mars is the Red Planet. Mars even
appears red to the naked eye (without the aid of a telescope or even
binoculars) in our sky.
The Earth has a magnetic
field, but we do not completely understand how this magnetic field is generated.
According to older theories, the Earth’s magnetic
field is generated by its solid (inner) core. This theory may seem reasonable, since the
solid (inner) core is composed of ferromagnetic metals such as iron and
nickel. However, we now realize that
this old model is too simplistic. According
to more modern theories, the Earth’s magnetic field is
created by its molten (outer) core.
This more modern theory also seems reasonable, since the molten (outer)
core is also composed of ferromagnetic metals such as iron and nickel. These modern theories claim that the rotation
of the Earth causes circulating currents of molten metal in the outer
core. These circulating currents of
molten metal in turn generate the Earth’s magnetic field. These more modern theories seem reasonable, but nevertheless these theories are not fully
developed. If these models are correct,
then the two equally important variables that create a metallic-rocky planet’s
magnetic field is a metallic core that is at least partially
molten and reasonably rapid rotation.
Indeed, among the four planets closer to the Sun (Mercury, Venus, Earth,
and Mars), the Earth has the strongest magnetic field, since it is the only one
of these four planets that has both a partially molten metallic core and
reasonably rapid rotation. For example,
Venus probably has a partially molten metallic core,
but Venus has very slow rotation. Hence,
Venus has a very weak magnetic field. As
another example, Mars has reasonably rapid rotation, but Mars has a metallic core
that is no longer partially molten. Hence, Mars also has a very weak magnetic
field. Caution: we are only comparing
the magnetic fields of the four inner planets closer to the Sun. Although the Earth has the strongest magnetic
field among the inner planets, its magnetic field is still weak compared with
all four outer planets further from the Sun (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and
Neptune).
The overall structure of the
Earth’s magnetic field is very much similar to the magnetic field created by a
bar magnet, such as a refrigerator magnet.
In fact, the only difference between the Earth’s magnetic field and a
bar magnet’s magnetic field is strength.
The Earth’s magnetic field is thousands of times weaker than a bar
magnet’s magnetic field. That is, a bar
magnet’s magnetic field is thousands of times stronger than the Earth’s
magnetic field. Students often cannot
believe that a small refrigerator magnet could create a stronger magnetic field
than an entire planet, but this stands to reason actually. A refrigerator magnet’s magnetic field is
strong enough to lift paper clips for example, but the Earth’s magnetic field
is not this strong. The Earth’s magnetic
field is everywhere around us, yet we do not see paper clips floating around
us! A refrigerator magnet’s magnetic
field is strong enough to lift paper clips against planet Earth’s gravitational
field, but planet Earth’s magnetic field is not strong enough to lift paper
clips against its own gravitational field.
Hence, the Earth’s magnetic field is indeed thousands of times weaker than
a bar magnet’s magnetic field.
The Earth’s magnetic field
reverses itself once every few hundred thousand years. We do not understand how or why this
occurs. We do know that it does happen
from the magnetization of iron within rocks.
The uppermost layer of rock has its iron magnetized in the same
direction as the Earth’s magnetic field; this is called
normal polarity. However, a deeper layer
of rock has its iron magnetized in the opposite direction of the Earth’s
magnetic field; this is called reverse polarity. An even deeper layer of rock has normal
polarity again, and an even more deep layer of rock
has reverse polarity again. In other
words, the magnetization of iron within rock (the polarity) alternates from
normal to reverse and back again. The
reason for this is clear. When new rock
forms, the iron within that rock will become magnetized
in whichever direction the Earth’s magnetic field happens to point at the time
of that rock’s formation. The Earth’s
magnetic field must reverse itself periodically to cause the alternating
polarity of rock layers. Therefore, we
are certain that the Earth’s magnetic field reverses itself once every few
hundred thousand years, but again we do not understand how or why this occurs.
It is a common misconception
that the Earth’s magnetic field begins at the north pole
and ends at the south pole. This is
false for a couple of reasons. Firstly,
it is a basic law of physics that magnetic field lines are
not permitted to begin or end anywhere; magnetic field lines must form
closed loops. The magnetic field lines
of a bar magnet, such as a refrigerator magnet for example, do not begin at the
north pole of the magnet, nor do they end at the south pole of the magnet. The magnetic field lines of a bar magnet go
straight through the magnet, coming out of its north pole, circulating around
to go into its south pole, going straight through the magnet, and coming out
its north pole again. Similarly, the
magnetic field lines of planet Earth go straight through the planet, coming out
one end, circulating around to go into the opposite end, going straight through
the planet, and coming out again.
Moreover, the Earth’s magnetic field lines do not come out from nor do
they go into the geographical poles. The
Earth’s magnetic field lines come out from and go into the magnetic poles,
which are different from the geographical poles. Indeed, a magnetic compass does not point
toward geographical north as is commonly believed. A magnetic compass points toward magnetic
north, which again is different from geographical north. Admittedly, the Earth’s magnetic poles are
somewhat close to the planet’s geographical poles, but there is no reason to
expect that the magnetic poles should be the same or even close to the
geographical poles. The solid (inner)
core is literally floating within the molten (outer) core. Therefore, the solid (inner) core is actually
detached from the rest of the planet.
Consequently, there is no reason to expect that the solid (inner) core
is rotating in precisely the same direction as the rest of the planet. In addition, there are circulating currents
of molten metal within the molten (outer) core.
In brief, the rotation of the Earth is complicated; the entire planet
does not rotate together as one solid unit.
Therefore, there is no reason to expect that the magnetic poles should
be the same or even close to the geographical poles. To ask why the Earth’s magnetic poles are
different from the geographical poles is a wrong question to ask, since there
is no reason to expect that the magnetic poles should be the same as the
geographical poles. The correct question
to ask is why are the Earth’s magnetic poles even close to the Earth’s
geographical poles. We do not understand
why this is the case. Indeed, other
planets have magnetic poles that are completely different from their
geographical poles.
The solar wind is a stream of
charged particles from the Sun composed primarily of protons and
electrons. This solar wind is capable of
substantially ionizing the Earth’s atmosphere in a fairly
short amount of time.
Fortunately, the Earth’s magnetic field, although weak compared with the
magnetic field of bar magnets, is sufficiently strong to deflect most of the
Sun’s solar wind. Some of the charged
particles in the solar wind do however become trapped
within the Earth’s magnetic field. These
charged particles execute helical trajectories around the Earth’s magnetic
field lines. These regions of the
Earth’s magnetic field are called the Van Allen belts,
named for the American physicist James Van Allen who discovered these belts in
the year 1958. The charged particles
within the Van Allen belts execute helical trajectories while drifting along
the Earth’s magnetic field lines toward the magnetic poles. The charged particles eventually collide with
the molecules of the Earth’s atmosphere, surrendering their kinetic energy by
emitting light. The result is gorgeous
curtains of light or sheets of light across the sky near the Earth’s magnetic
poles. This is called
an aurora. Near the Earth’s north
magnetic pole it is called aurora borealis (or more commonly the northern
lights), and near the Earth’s south magnetic pole it is called aurora australis (or more commonly the southern lights). If the Sun happens to be less active, its
solar wind would be weaker, the resulting aurorae would appear less
spectacular, and we would only be able to enjoy them near the Earth’s magnetic
poles. If the Sun happens to be more
active, its solar wind would be stronger, the resulting aurorae would appear
more spectacular, and we would be able to enjoy them further from the Earth’s
magnetic poles. For example, the Battle
of Fredericksburg in December 1862 during the American Civil War was interrupted by the appearance of the aurora borealis in
the sky, even though Fredericksburg, Virginia is quite far from the Earth’s
north magnetic pole.
The interior of the geosphere
is hot due to geothermal energy. This
geothermal energy drives geologic activity, as we will discuss shortly. The source of this geothermal energy is
primarily radioactive decay. There are
certain atoms that have an unstable nucleus, since the nucleus has too much
energy. To stabilize itself, the nucleus
will emit particles to decrease its own energy.
These atoms are called radioactive atoms, and
the emission of these particles is called radioactive decay. A certain naturally occurring fraction
(percentage) of all the atoms in the universe are radioactive. A certain fraction (percentage) of the atoms
that compose the geosphere are radioactive.
When these atoms suffer from radioactive decay, the emitted particles
are themselves a source of energy. This
is the source of the Earth’s geothermal energy.
A planet larger than the Earth would have a longer geologic lifetime
than the Earth, since it would have more mass and therefore more radioactive
atoms and hence a greater supply of geothermal energy. A planet smaller than the Earth would have a
shorter geologic lifetime than the Earth, since it would have less mass and
therefore less radioactive atoms and hence a smaller supply of geothermal
energy. Billions of years from now, most
of the radioactive atoms of planet Earth will have decayed. With very little radioactive atoms remaining
to provide geothermal energy, geologic activity will end, and the Earth will
become a geologically dead planet. This
geologic death has already occurred for other planets smaller than the
Earth. The planets Mercury and Mars for
example are geologically dead planets, since they are significantly smaller
than the Earth. However, planet Venus
has almost the same size as the Earth.
Presumably, the geologic lifetime of Venus is roughly the same as the
geologic lifetime of the Earth. Indeed,
both Venus and the Earth are currently geologically alive.
The three mechanisms by which
heat (energy) is transported from one location to
another are conduction, convection, and radiation. Conduction is the transfer of heat (energy)
from one object to another because they are in direct contact with one
another. For example, our hand becomes
hot when we grab a hot object because our hand is in direct contact with the
hot object when we grab it. The heat
(energy) is transferred from the hot object to our
hand by conduction, since our hand is in direct contact with the hot
object. Convection is the transfer of
heat (energy) from one object to another by moving materials. It is commonly known
that hot air rises and cold air sinks.
This is not just the case for air; this is true for any gas and for any
liquid as well. In physics, gases and
liquids are both considered fluids.
Caution: in colloquial English, the word fluid refers to liquids only,
but in physics the word fluid may apply to both
liquids and gases. Convection is the
transfer of heat (energy) by moving fluids, since hot fluids rise and cool
fluids sink. For example, a heater on
the first floor of a house also warms the second floor by convection. The heater on the first floor warms the air
on the first floor; since hot fluids rise, the hot air rises to the second
floor and warms the second floor. When
the air that has risen to the second floor loses its heat and cools, it sinks
back to the first floor, where it is warmed again by the
heater. Radiation is the transfer
of heat (energy) without direct contact and without moving fluids. Radiation typically transports heat (energy)
using electromagnetic waves. For
example, heat (energy) is not transported from the Sun
to the Earth by conduction, since the Earth is not in direct contact with the
Sun, thank God! Heat (energy) is not transported from the Sun to the Earth by convection,
since there is no fluid in outer space that takes the Sun’s heat (energy) and
moves it to the Earth. The Sun’s heat
(energy) is transported to the Earth across outer
space by radiation, through electromagnetic waves.
The Theory of Plate Tectonics
Christopher Columbus
discovered America in the year 1492, more than five hundred years ago. Shortly thereafter, the Italian navigator Amerigo Vespucci further explored the American continents
and was the first to recognize that America was in fact a New World, and hence
this New World was named America in his honor. Over the following decades, other navigators
continued to explore the American continents.
As a result of all of their achievements, maps
of the entire world were eventually drawn for the first time in human
history. In these world maps,
cartographers noticed that the east coast of South America has a similar shape to
the west coast of Africa. Most
cartographers believed that this was only a coincidence, since the coastlines
appeared to have similar shapes but not precisely the same shape. The first person to
seriously investigate why these two coastlines share similar shapes was
the German meteorologist Alfred Wegener during the early twentieth
century. Although Wegener was not a
geologist, he discovered that the rocks on the east coast of South America and
the rocks on the west coast of Africa are similar to one another. He began to imagine that South America and
Africa were connected to each other in the distant
past and have moved apart from one another since that ancient time. He also imagined that North America and
Europe were connected to each other in the distant past and have
also moved apart from one another since that ancient time. When Wegener connected maps of North America
and Europe to each other like a jigsaw puzzle, he noticed that the Appalachian
Mountains in North America connect with the Scandinavian Mountains in
Europe. Although Wegener was not a
geologist, he then discovered that the rocks that compose the Appalachian
Mountains in North America are similar to the rocks that compose the
Scandinavian Mountains in Europe!
Wegener then discovered that South America and Africa were in the same
cold climate in the distant past, leading him to imagine that these continents
were not only connected to each other in the distant past but also further
south where it is cold. If South America
and Africa were connected to each other and further
south, Wegener imagined that North America and Europe were not only connected
to each other in the distant past but also further south, perhaps near the
equator where it is warm. Wegener then
discovered that during the same ancient cold climate in South America and
Africa, North America and Europe were indeed in the same ancient warm
climate! Finally, Wegener discovered
fossils of the same animals in South America and Africa; these
were fossils of land animals that could not swim across an ocean. Putting all of these observations together,
Alfred Wegener proposed the hypothesis of continental drift in his textbook The Origin of Continents and Oceans,
published in the year 1915. According to
his hypothesis, the continents were connected to one
another in the distant past and have drifted apart from one another since that
ancient time. Wegener’s hypothesis of
continental drift was rejected and ridiculed by the
geological community at the time.
Today, we realize that some of Alfred Wegener’s ideas were indeed
incorrect. For example, Wegener proposed
that gravitational forces from the Moon causes the continents to drift. Although gravitational forces from the Moon
(and the Sun) cause tides in the oceans as we will discuss later in the course,
these gravitational forces are not strong enough to push continents. Wegener also proposed that the continents cut
through the rock at the ocean floor as they drift. Today, we realize that this is incorrect as
well. Nevertheless, today we do realize
that Wegener’s basic idea that the continents are moving is in fact
correct. Alfred Wegener died in the year
1930, shortly after his fiftieth birthday while on an expedition surveying the
enormous ice sheet that covers the microcontinent Greenland. If he had lived a few decades longer, he
would have lived to see that his hypothesis of continental drift was
essentially correct, although not entirely correct. In the late 1920s,
the British geologist Arthur Holmes proposed that convection within the mantle may transfer thermal energy (heat) from the lower mantle
deep within the geosphere to the upper mantle near the surface of the
geosphere. He also proposed that this
thermal energy could be transferred to the continents,
pushing them as Alfred Wegener envisioned.
Unfortunately, it would take a few decades before the ideas of Alfred
Wegener and Arthur Holmes would be combined to
formulate the correct theory of the geology of planet Earth.
The Second World War occurred
from the year 1939 to the year 1945.
Before the Second World War, the United States maintained a small
standing army. Whenever the United
States needed to wage war, the federal government would assemble a massive army
that would fight and win the war. After
the war ended, the army was almost entirely disbanded. This occurred after the end of the American
Civil War and after the end of the First World War for example. However, the Axis Powers (Germany, Italy, and
Japan) almost succeeded in literal global domination during the Second World
War. Although the Axis Powers were
defeated, that threat was immediately replaced by
another threat. The Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics (the U.S.S.R. or the Soviet Union) had used the Second
World War as an opportunity to conquer half of the entire world. After the United States defeated three
nations that almost succeeded in literal global domination and upon realizing
the new global threat that it faced, the political leadership of the United
States decided against disbanding its army, and the United States continues to
maintain a large standing army to the present day. Enormous amounts of funds have
been invested in the armed forces of the United States since the end of
the Second World War. As a result, the
armed forces of the United States have pioneered many branches of scientific
research. In the context of this course,
the United States Navy founded the Office of Naval Research (ONR) in the year 1946.
The Office of Naval Research (ONR) discovered
the continental shelves, which are the parts of the continents that are submerged under the ocean. The true shape of a continent is only obtained when we include the continental shelves
together with the rest of the continent.
When we include the continental shelves, the east coast of South America
in fact fits perfectly into the west coast of Africa. This is no longer a
coincidence that we can simply ignore.
The Office of Naval Research (ONR) also
discovered oceanic ridges, which are mountain ranges at the bottom of the
ocean. In particular, the Mid-Atlantic
Ridge runs along the middle of the Atlantic Ocean and itself has the same shape
as the east coast of South America and the west coast of Africa. This is also not a
coincidence that we can simply ignore.
The Office of Naval Research (ONR) later
discovered a continuum of rock ages at the bottom of the ocean. The rocks that compose oceanic ridges are
youngest, and the rocks that compose the ocean basin are progressively older
and older further and further from the oceanic ridges, closer and closer to
continents. Indeed, the rocks that
compose the ocean basins nearest to continents are oldest. The Office of Naval Research (ONR) also discovered a continuum of sediment thickness at
the bottom of the ocean. The sediments
that cover the ocean floor are thinnest near the oceanic ridges, and the
sediments that cover the ocean floor are progressively thicker and thicker
further and further from the oceanic ridges, closer and closer to
continents. Indeed, the sediments that
cover the ocean floor nearest to continents are thickest. This continuum of sediment thickness is
consistent with the continuum of rock age.
If rock is older, then there has been more time for sediment to
accumulate, and so the sediment should be thicker; if rock is younger, then
there has been less time for sediment to accumulate, and so the sediment should
be thinner. The Office of Naval Research
(ONR) also mapped the global distribution of seismic
activity such as earthquakes and the global distribution of igneous activity
such as volcanic eruptions. These two
global distributions closely match each other.
Some locations on planet Earth have an abundance of both seismic and
igneous activity, while other locations on planet Earth have very little
seismic or igneous activity. Finally,
the Office of Naval Research (ONR) discovered
alternating magnetic polarities within rocks on the ocean floor. This alternating magnetic polarity is not
just vertically downward to deeper rock layers but also laterally (horizontally)
across neighboring rocks, providing the strongest evidence that the ocean floor
must be moving. All of these
observations led geologists to conclude that continents and ocean basins slowly
move over millions of years. During the 1960s, American geophysicists
Harry Hammond Hess, Robert S. Dietz, and Robert R. Coats, British geophysicists
Drummond Matthews and Frederick Vine, Canadian geophysicists Lawrence Morley
and John Tuzo Wilson, American geophysicist W. Jason
Morgan, British geophysicists Dan P. McKenzie and Robert L. Parker, French
geophysicist Xavier Le Pichon, and American
geophysicists Jack Oliver, Bryan Isacks, and Lynn R.
Sykes, together formulated the fundamental theory of the geology of planet
Earth: the Theory of Plate Tectonics.
Whereas Alfred Wegener and Arthur Holmes were the grandfathers of this
theory, these fourteen geophysicists were the true fathers of the Theory of
Plate Tectonics.
According to the Theory of
Plate Tectonics, the lithosphere is fractured (or broken)
into roughly twenty pieces called tectonic plates. The adjective tectonic is
derived from a Greek word meaning construction or building. In other words, the Theory of Plate Tectonics
states that the lithosphere is composed of (built from or constructed from)
pieces. These tectonic plates are
floating on the asthenosphere and are being pushed
very slowly by convection cells in the asthenosphere. Mostly solid but
nevertheless weak rock in the lower layers of the asthenosphere are
heated by the Earth’s geothermal energy.
Since hot fluids rise, this hot rock rises until it reaches a tectonic
plate of the lithosphere. The risen rock
then pushes the tectonic plate in a certain direction, since the thermal energy
(heat energy) of the rock is transformed into the
kinetic energy (moving energy) of the tectonic plate. Since the tectonic plate gains kinetic energy
at the expense of the thermal energy of the rock, the rock must become cooler
as it pushes the tectonic plate. Since
cool fluids sink, the now cooler rock sinks back into the asthenosphere, where
it is warmed again by the Earth’s geothermal
energy. In brief, there are circulating
currents of weak rock within the asthenosphere.
These are called convection cells. These convection cells push the tectonic
plates very slowly, a few centimeters per year on average. According to the Theory of Plate Tectonics,
much geologic activity occurs at the boundary between two tectonic plates. There are three different types of tectonic
plate boundaries: divergent plate boundaries, convergent plate boundaries, and
transform fault boundaries.
At a divergent plate
boundary, two tectonic plates are being pushed away
from each other. The verb to diverge
means to spread out. As the tectonic
plates are pushed away from each other, hot rock
within the asthenosphere can rise and deposit itself onto the tectonic
plates. As the rock cools, it may
crystallize into solid igneous rock.
Hence, this is the youngest part of a tectonic plate, since newborn rock
forms at divergent plate boundaries.
Entire mountain ranges can be built at
divergent plate boundaries. For example,
the Mid-Atlantic Ridge runs along the middle of the Atlantic Ocean and assumes
the same shape as the east coast of South America and the west coast of Africa. The South American continent is actually a
part of a much larger tectonic plate called the South American plate, and the
African continent is actually a part of a much larger tectonic plate called the
African plate. The South American plate
and the African plate are being pushed away from each
other, permitting hot rock to rise from out of the asthenosphere. The hot rock has deposited onto both plates,
has cooled, and has crystallized to form the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. This is why the shape of the east coast of South
America, the west coast of Africa, and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between them are all similar to each other.
South America and Africa were connected to each
other roughly two hundred million years ago, but they have been pushed apart
from one another, thus forming the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at the boundary between
these two tectonic plates. North America
and Europe were also connected to each other roughly
two hundred million years ago, and they are also being pushed apart from one
another. The Atlantic Ocean is
continuously becoming wider very slowly, only a few centimeters per year. The Red Sea between the Arabian peninsula and northeastern Africa is the result of another
divergent plate boundary. The Arabian peninsula was ripped off of the continent of Africa millions
of years ago, opening up the Red Sea.
The African continent is still being ripped
apart in southeastern Africa, forming the African Rift Valleys. If we wait millions of years, the African
Rift Valleys will rip open to become a narrow sea like the Red Sea. If we wait millions of more years, that narrow sea will open even wider to become a
growing ocean like the Atlantic Ocean.
At a convergent plate
boundary, two tectonic plates are being pushed toward
each other. The verb to converge means
to come together. As the tectonic plates
are pushed toward each other, they eventually
collide. The more dense tectonic plate
will sink into the asthenosphere, while the less dense tectonic plate will rise
out of the asthenosphere. Hence, the
more dense plate will sink underneath the less dense plate. As the more dense tectonic plate sinks into
the asthenosphere, it is heated by the Earth’s
geothermal energy. Eventually, the plate
becomes sufficiently hot that it melts.
Hence, this is the oldest part of a tectonic plate, since the tectonic
plate is being destroyed as it melts into molten
rock. Liquids are usually less dense
than solids. Hence, this less dense
molten rock may rise and collide underneath the other tectonic plate; the molten
rock may even push through the other tectonic plate, forming active
volcanoes. For example, the Nazca plate
at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean and the South American plate are being pushed toward each other. The Nazca plate is more
dense, since it is an oceanic plate composed primarily of mafic igneous
rock. The South American plate is less
dense, since it is a continental plate composed primarily of felsic igneous
rock. Thus, the Nazca plate is sinking
underneath the South American plate. As
the Nazca plate sinks, it is heated by the Earth’s
geothermal energy. The Nazca plate
melts, and the less dense molten rock rises.
The molten rock collides underneath and even pushes through the South
American plate, forming the Andes Mountains on the west coast of South
America. Indeed, many of the mountains
in the Andes are volcanically active.
The Nazca plate is an example of an oceanic plate, since it is at the
bottom of the Pacific Ocean. The South
American plate is an example of a continental plate, since it is mostly the
South American continent. Hence, the
Andes Mountains have formed at an oceanic-continental convergent plate
boundary. It is always
the oceanic plate that sinks underneath the continental plate at an
oceanic-continental convergent plate boundary, since oceanic plates are
composed primarily of more dense mafic igneous rock and continental plates are
composed primarily of less dense felsic igneous rock. These oceanic-continental convergent plate
boundaries form continental volcanic arcs, such as the Andes Mountains. At an oceanic-oceanic convergent plate
boundary, two oceanic plates collide.
Again, the more dense plate will sink underneath the less dense plate. The more dense plate is
heated and melts. The molten rock
rises and collides underneath and may even push through the other tectonic
plate, again forming active volcanoes.
These are volcanic island arcs, such as the Aleutian Islands in Alaska
or the Japanese Islands or the Philippine Islands. A subduction zone is wherever one tectonic plate
sinks underneath another tectonic plate.
There are two different types of subduction zones: oceanic-continental
convergence forming continental volcanic arcs such as the Andes Mountains and
oceanic-oceanic convergence forming volcanic island arcs such as the Aleutian
Islands, the Japanese Islands, or the Philippine Islands. However, continental-continental convergence
does not result in a subduction zone, since continental plates are too thick to
permit one plate to sink underneath the other plate. If two continental plates collide and if the
convection cells in the asthenosphere continue to push them toward each other,
the rock of both plates becomes folded. If we apply a large force to rock in a short duration of time, we will fault (break) the rock. However, if we apply a small force to rock
over a long duration of time, we will bend or deform
or warp the rock. The technical term for
this bending or deforming or warping is folding. If we apply a small force to rock over a long
duration of time, we will fold the rock.
Hence, two colliding continental plates become folded. The rocks are folded upward forming
non-volcanic mountains, since there is no subduction. The technical term for these non-volcanic
mountains is fold mountains. For example, millions of years ago the Indian
plate was near the South Pole. The
Indian plate was pushed northward and closed up an ancient
ocean that no longer exists. The
Indian plate eventually collided with the Eurasian plate. As the plates continue to be
pushed toward each other, they have folded upward forming the Himalayas,
the tallest mountains in the world. The
Himalayas continue to grow taller, although very slowly, as the Indian plate
and the Eurasian plate continue to be pushed toward each other. Mount Everest is in the Himalayas, is the
tallest mountain in the world, and is still growing taller, although only a few
centimeters per year. The Appalachian
Mountains are another example of fold mountains. Two hundred million years ago, the North
American plate and the Eurasian plate collided and folded upward, forming the
Appalachian Mountains. The Appalachian
Mountains were the tallest mountains in the world roughly two hundred million
years ago. However, over the past two
hundred million years, the North American plate and the Eurasian plate have
diverged from one another, and thus the Appalachian Mountains are no longer
growing taller. In fact, the Appalachian
Mountains are continuously becoming shorter as natural forces such as wind and
rain degrade (weaken and destroy) their rocks, ultimately breaking them down
into sediment and moving the sediment to other landscapes. The Ural Mountains are also fold mountains.
Hundreds of millions of years ago, Europe and Asia were two separate
continents. They collided, forming the
Ural Mountains. For hundreds of years,
humans believed that the Ural Mountains were an arbitrary geographical boundary
between Europe and Asia. The Theory of
Plate Tectonics has revealed that the Ural Mountains are not an arbitrary geographical
boundary between Europe and Asia. The
Theory of Plate Tectonics has revealed that the Ural Mountains are the actual
geological boundary between Europe and Asia!
In summary, there are three different types of convergent plate
boundaries: oceanic-continental convergence, oceanic-oceanic convergence, and
continental-continental convergence. At
oceanic-continental convergence, we have continental volcanic arcs such as the
Andes Mountains. At oceanic-oceanic
convergence, we have volcanic island arcs such as the Aleutian Islands, the
Japanese Islands, and the Philippine Islands.
These two cases are subduction zones.
However, at continental-continental convergence, we do not have
subduction; we have fold mountains such as the
Himalayas, the Appalachians, or the Urals.
The Wilson cycle describes
the evolution (the birth, growth, decline, and death) of ocean basins, named
for the Canadian geophysicist John Tuzo Wilson, one
of the fathers of the Theory of Plate Tectonics. According to the Wilson cycle, we begin with
no ocean basin at a continental rift valley, such as the African Rift
Valleys. After millions of years, the
continental rift valley will rip open to form a narrow widening sea, such as
the Red Sea. After millions of more
years, the narrow sea will gradually widen to form a growing ocean, such as the
Atlantic Ocean. After millions of more
years, the margins of that ocean basin may begin to subduct
beneath other tectonic plates. The
result is a dying ocean, such as the Pacific Ocean. Although the Pacific Ocean is much larger
than the Atlantic Ocean, the Pacific Ocean is a dying ocean that is gradually
closing up. After millions of more
years, the ocean basin has closed up so much that it is now a narrow closing
sea, such as the Mediterranean Sea.
Finally, that narrow sea will close entirely forming fold mountains,
such as the Himalayas, the Appalachians, or the Urals. In millions of years, fold
mountains will form when Africa collides with Europe thus closing up the
Mediterranean Sea. Geologists have given
these future mountains a name even though they have not yet been born; they are called the Mediterranean Mountains. The rock around the Mediterranean Sea has
already started folding, forming the Atlas Mountains in Africa and the Alps in
Europe.
At a transform fault
boundary, two tectonic plates slide across each other. Tectonic plates are not smooth, since they
are composed of rock. Hence, the sliding
of the tectonic plates across each other causes seismic activity, such as weak vibrations. On occasion, the two tectonic plates become
stuck, but the convection cells in the asthenosphere continue to try to push
the plates across each other. It may
take several years or even several decades, but eventually the plates become
unstuck and slide across each other by a tremendous amount, perhaps several
meters. An enormous amount of energy is liberated from years or even decades of accumulated
stored energy within the rock, thus causing intense vibrations. This powerful type of seismic activity is called an earthquake.
For example, the San Andreas Fault is the boundary between the North
American plate and the Pacific plate.
The North American plate is being pushed south,
while the Pacific plate is being pushed north.
The sliding of these two tectonic plates across each other causes
seismic activity, including earthquakes.
This explains why there is an abundance of seismic activity, including
earthquakes, in California, since it is on the west coast of North America at
the boundary between the North American plate and the Pacific plate. This also explains why the shape of Baja
California fits into the shape of Mexico.
Millions of years ago, Baja California was connected
to Mexico. As these two tectonic plates
were pushed in two opposite directions, Baja California was ripped off of the Mexican mainland, opening up the Sea of
Cortez. If we wait millions of years,
all of Baja California together with upper California
(the State of California) will be ripped off of the North American mainland
forming an enormous island off the west coast of North America. Geologists have given this future island a
name even though it has not yet been born; it is called
the Island of California. The Island of
California will then continue to move north as the Pacific plate continues to be pushed north.
Most geologic activity occurs
at ocean basins (at the bottom of the ocean), simply because most of the world
is covered with ocean. For example, most
seismic activity such as earthquakes occurs at the bottom of the ocean. Most igneous activity such as volcanic
eruptions occurs at the bottom of the ocean.
Most mountains are at the bottom of the ocean. Even most landslides occur at the bottom of
the ocean. The San Andreas Fault is
actually an example of a continental-continental transform fault boundary. The Queen Charlotte Fault off the west coast
of Canada is an example of an oceanic-oceanic transform fault boundary that
causes earthquakes at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean and near the west coast
of Canada. Just as it is
popularly known among many Americans that the San Andreas Fault
continually causes earthquakes near their west coast, it is popularly known
among many Canadians that the Queen Charlotte Fault continually causes
earthquakes near their west coast.
According to the Theory of
Plate Tectonics, geologic activity does not just occur at plate
boundaries. Geologic activity also
occurs at hotspots, which are caused by mantle
plumes. A mantle plume is a rising mass
of hot rock within the asthenosphere.
The rising mantle plume eventually collides underneath a tectonic
plate. This collision can occur anywhere
underneath the tectonic plate depending on the location of the mantle
plume. The collision need not be located
at a plate boundary; the collision could even occur in the middle of a tectonic
plate. After the collision, the hot rock
may push through the tectonic plate, causing geologic activity at this location
on the tectonic plate. This is called a hotspot.
For example, there is volcanic activity in the Hawaiian Islands, but the
Hawaiian Islands are nowhere near a plate boundary; the Hawaiian Islands are in
the middle of the Pacific plate. The
volcanic activity in the Hawaiian Islands is caused by
a hotspot, which is itself caused by a mantle plume. Molten rock pushes out of the Pacific plate
at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. The
extruding molten rock builds a volcano at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. More extruding molten rock grows the volcano
taller and taller until it protrudes out of the Pacific Ocean. It is now a volcanic island. We all learn in primary (elementary) school
that Mount Everest in the Himalayas is the tallest mountain in the world. Actually, if we measure the height of the
Hawaiian Islands above their true base, which is at the bottom of the Pacific
Ocean, then the Hawaiian Islands are in fact the tallest mountains in the
world. As measured from their true base
at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean, the Hawaiian Islands are much taller than
Mount Everest. It is however strictly
correct to state that Mount Everest has the highest elevation above sea level.
The rocks that compose the
westernmost Hawaiian island are oldest, while the rocks that compose the
Hawaiian Islands further and further east are younger and younger. The rocks that compose the easternmost
Hawaiian island (commonly known as the Big Hawaiian Island) are youngest, and
that is the only Hawaiian island with active volcanism. All the other volcanoes on all the other
Hawaiian Islands are extinct. This
suggests that the hotspot is moving east, but in actuality the Pacific plate is
moving west over the hotspot. As the
Pacific plate moves west, the hotspot pushes up a Hawaiian island with active
volcanism. As the Pacific
plate continues to move west, that Hawaiian island moves west and off of the
hotspot causing its volcanoes to become extinct, while the hotspot pushes up a
new Hawaiian island with active volcanism.
As the Pacific plate continues to move west,
that Hawaiian island moves west and off of the hotspot causing its volcanoes to
become extinct, while the hotspot pushes up a new Hawaiian island, and so on
and so forth. If we wait millions of
years, the Big Hawaiian Island will move off of the
hotspot, its volcanoes will become extinct, and the hotspot will push up a new
Hawaiian island to the east of the easternmost Big Hawaiian Island. This is already beginning to occur. To the east of the easternmost Big Hawaiian
Island, there is a small active volcano at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. If we wait millions of years, that active
volcano will grow to become a new Hawaiian island.
Although the Hawaiian Islands
are volcanic islands, we cannot classify the Hawaiian Islands as a volcanic
island arc, since we must reserve that term for volcanic islands that are caused by subduction, such as the Aleutian Islands, the
Japanese Islands, or the Philippine Islands.
The Hawaiian Islands are not caused by
subduction; the Hawaiian Islands are caused by a hotspot, which is itself
caused by a mantle plume. Geologists use
the term nematath to describe volcanic islands caused
by a hotspot caused by a mantle plume.
The word nematath literally means
string/trail/chain of dung/excrement/defecation/feces/turds. The vulgar word for dung/excrement/defecation/feces/turds
is sh!#$&*t. Just as a string/trail/chain of
dung/excrement/defecation/feces/turds, vulgarly known as sh!#$&*t,
left by geese reveals in which direction the geese have walked, a nematath such as the Hawaiian Islands reveals in which
direction a tectonic plate is moving. We
can even calculate the speed of the tectonic plate from the spacing of the
islands of the nematath and the ages of the rocks
that compose the islands of the nematath. This is why geologists use the term nematath for volcanic islands caused by a hotspot caused by
a mantle plume, since such a group of volcanic islands is rather like a
string/trail/chain of dung/excrement/defecation/feces/turds, vulgarly known as sh!#$&*t.
Imagine a globe that depicts
the shapes of the continents and the oceans.
The Theory of Plate Tectonics has revealed that the Earth has never
looked this way before and that the Earth will never look this way again. If the tectonic plates are slowly but
continuously being pushed by convection cells in the
asthenosphere, then the shapes of the continents and the oceans are slowly but
continuously changing. We do not notice
this occurring, but we would notice significant changes if we wait millions of
years. During some eras of Earth’s
history, the continents may have been more uniformly (evenly) distributed
around the planet. During other eras in
Earth’s history, the continents may have all been together as
one giant landmass called a supercontinent. A supercontinent is
surrounded by a superocean, the unity of all
the oceans around the supercontinent.
According to the supercontinent cycle, once every roughly five hundred
million years, all the continents are together as a supercontinent surrounded
by a superocean.
If planet Earth is roughly 4.6 billion years old and if there is a
supercontinent every roughly five hundred million years, then there have been
roughly nine or ten supercontinents thus far in Earth’s history. In roughly five billion years, the Sun will
swell to become a red giant, thus destroying all four of the inner planets,
including the Earth. If the Earth will
be destroyed in roughly five billion years and if there is a supercontinent
every roughly five hundred million years, then there will be roughly ten
supercontinents in the Earth’s future.
Therefore, over the entire history of planet Earth, there have been and
there will be very roughly twenty supercontinents. Many students believe that we happen to be alive
when the continents are uniformly (evenly) distributed around the planet, but
this is not the case. The continents are
presently crowded together on the opposite side of planet Earth from the
Pacific Ocean, which is by far the largest ocean in the entire world. The continents are also presently more
crowded toward the northern hemisphere as compared with the southern
hemisphere. Therefore, we happen to be
alive not when the continents are more uniformly (evenly) distributed; we
happen to be alive when the continents are rather crowded together. This is because rather recently, roughly two
hundred million years ago, all the continents were together in one giant
supercontinent called Pangaea surrounded by a superocean
called Panthalassa. It is a common
misconception that when the Earth formed, the continents were all together as
Pangaea and have been spreading apart ever since. This is false. Again, there have been roughly ten
supercontinents in Earth’s history thus far, and there will be another roughly
ten supercontinents in the Earth’s future.
Not only was Pangaea not the first supercontinent in Earth’s history,
Pangaea was in fact the most recent supercontinent in Earth’s history. There were several other supercontinents
before Pangea ever formed, and there will be several other supercontinents in
the Earth’s future.
The Theory of Plate Tectonics
has explained seismic activity, such as earthquakes in California. The Theory of Plate Tectonics has explained subductive igneous activity, such as the volcanic activity
in the Andes Mountains, the Aleutian Islands, the Japanese Islands, and the
Philippine Islands. The Theory of Plate
Tectonics has explained the formation of non-volcanic mountains, such as the
Himalayas, the Appalachians, and the Urals.
The Theory of Plate Tectonics has explained why the continents fit
together like a jigsaw puzzle, such as the east coast of South America fitting
into the west coast of Africa and the Arabian peninsula
fitting into northeastern Africa and Baja California fitting into Mexico. The Theory of Plate Tectonics has even
explained the igneous activity of the Hawaiian Islands. The Theory of Plate Tectonics is truly the
fundamental theory of the geology of planet Earth. Caution: the Theory of Plate Tectonics has
not explained all geologic phenomena on planet Earth; there are still many
examples of geologic activity that geologists do not completely
understand. Nevertheless, whenever a
geologist tries to understand any geologic activity on planet Earth, the
geologist does so within the context of the Theory of Plate Tectonics.
During eras of Earth’s
history when there was a supercontinent at the equator, the climate of the
entire planet would be warm, since the equator is warm throughout the entire
year. During other eras of Earth’s history
when there were continents and/or microcontinents that were relatively isolated
at one or both poles, the climate of the entire planet would be cold, since the
poles are cold throughout the entire year.
An ice age is a long period of time, lasting
millions of years, when the climate of the entire planet is cold. There have been several ice ages throughout
Earth’s history thus far. It is truly
remarkable how we have just applied the Theory of Plate Tectonics to climatology. The Theory of Plate Tectonics is the
fundamental theory of the Earth’s geology, the study of the geosphere (the
solid part of the Earth). We might
suspect that this theory therefore has nothing to do with meteorology and
climatology, which are the study of the Earth’s atmosphere. Nevertheless, we have just applied the Theory
of Plate Tectonics to explain ice ages, a climatological phenomenon. Therefore, the Theory of Plate Tectonics is
not just the fundamental theory of the geology of planet Earth; the Theory of
Plate Tectonics is one of the fundamental theories of all the Earth
Sciences. As another spectacular
application of the Theory of Plate Tectonics, consider the Great Australian
Desert. For reasons we will discuss
later in the course, the Great Australian Desert is the result of Australia’s
latitudinal location in the southern hemisphere. However, the Australian plate happens to be
moving north. In many millions of years,
Australia will be located north of its present location, perhaps at the
Equator. For reasons we will discuss
later in the course, continents located at the Equator have tropical
rainforests. Therefore, the Theory of
Plate Tectonics explains how the Great Australian Desert will
be transformed into the Great Australian Rainforest in many millions of
years. The Theory of Plate Tectonics
also explains the reverse, how tropical rainforests can be
transformed into deserts.
Evidence
for the Theory of Plate Tectonics includes the matching shapes of different
continents, similar rocks on different continents, matching mountain ranges on
different continents, similar ancient climates on different continents, fossils
of the same land animal on different continents, the continuum of rocks ages of
ocean-basin rocks, the continuum of sediment thickness on the ocean basins, the
magnetic reversals within ocean-basin rocks, seismic activity, and igneous
activity. There is also astronomical evidence for the
Theory of Plate Tectonics. Quasars are
the most distant galaxies in the universe from us. These quasars are so distant that they should
not appear to move. However,
astronomical observations of quasars using ground-based telescopes reveal that
they do appear to move slowly over periods of several years. We must conclude that it is
not the quasars that are moving; in fact, it is the telescope that is
itself moving in the opposite direction.
Since the ground-based telescope is upon a continent which is itself a
part of a tectonic plate, the apparent motion of quasars reveals that the
lithosphere is indeed fractured (broken) into tectonic plates that are all
moving in various directions. We can
even use the apparent motion of quasars to measure the actual motion of
tectonic plates. Furthermore, the global
positioning system (GPS) provides evidence for the Theory of Plate
Tectonics. The global positioning system
(GPS) is a collection of many artificial satellites that
humans have placed in orbit around the Earth that accurately measure the
motion of ground-based transceivers, such as mobile telephones for
example. However, the global positioning
system (GPS) has measured the motion of apparently stationary ground-based
transceivers. Once again, these
apparently stationary ground-based transceivers are upon continents which are
themselves part of tectonic plates.
Hence, the global positioning system (GPS) has further revealed that the
lithosphere of the Earth is fractured (broken) into tectonic plates that are
all moving in various directions. Before
the global positioning system (GPS), we were only able to measure the relative
motions of tectonic plates, the motions of tectonic plates relative to one
another. Using the global positioning
system (GPS), we are now able to measure the absolute motions of tectonic
plates, the motions of tectonic plates relative to the center of the Earth.
Although the Theory of Plate
Tectonics is the fundamental theory of the geology of planet Earth, the Theory
of Plate Tectonics is not a universal law of geology. In other words, the Theory of Plate Tectonics
does not apply to every metallic-rocky planet in the universe. The Theory of Plate Tectonics does not even
apply to every metallic-rocky planet in our Solar System. In particular, the Theory of Plate Tectonics
is not the correct theory to explain the geologic activity on planet Venus. Geophysicists continue to search for the
correct theory of the geology of planet Venus.
Orology
Orology is the study of
mountains, and an orologist is someone who studies
mountains. These words are derived from the Greek root oro-
for mountain. A collection of a few
mountains is called a mountain massif. A collection of a few mountain massifs, which
is therefore a large number of mountains, is called a
mountain range. A collection of a few
mountain ranges, which is therefore a large number of mountain massifs and thus
an enormous number of mountains, is called a
cordillera. Orography is the
classification of mountains, the study of different types of mountains. Orogenesis is the
study of how mountains form. Again,
these words are derived from the Greek root oro- for mountain.
In order to discuss orogenesis (the formation
of mountains), we must make a distinction between ductile deformation and
brittle deformation. If we apply a large
force to a rock in a short duration of time, we will
break the rock. This is brittle
deformation, and the technical term for a break within rock resulting from
brittle deformation is a fault. If we
apply a small force to a rock over a long duration of time, we will bend or deform or warp the rock. This is ductile deformation, and the
technical term for a bend or a deformation or a warp within rock resulting from
ductile deformation is a fold. In brief,
ductile deformation causes folds, while brittle deformation causes faults.
Small forces over long periods of time result in folded rock through ductile
deformation. Some parts of rock will be folded upward, while other parts of the rock will be
folded downward. Rocks that are folded
upward are called anticlines, which grow larger to become domes, which
eventually over millions of years grow to become fold
mountains. The rocks that are
folded downward are called synclines, which grow larger to become basins, which
eventually over millions of years grow to become valleys between fold mountains. Since
they do not form from subduction, fold mountains are
non-volcanic cordilleras. Examples of fold mountains include the Himalayas, the Appalachians, and
the Urals. The Atlas Mountains, the
Alps, and the Caucasus Mountains are also fold mountains
in the process of formation.
Large forces over short periods of time result in faulted rock through brittle
deformation. Vertical faults are called dip-slip faults, while horizontal faults are
called strike-slip faults. Note that
dip-slip faults need not be perfectly vertical. A fault that is slanted
in elevation would still be classified as a dip-slip fault. Caution: most faults are small breaks within
a tectonic plate. Some faults are
between different tectonic plates, but these are the largest faults in the
entire world. The largest dip-slip
faults in the world are called thrust faults, which is
simply another term for subduction zones.
The largest strike-slip faults in the world are called
transform faults. We need vertical
motion to create mountains and valleys.
Therefore, strike-slip faults do not form mountains and valleys; only
dip-slip faults form mountains and valleys.
With a dip-slip fault, some parts of the rock will be
faulted upward, while other parts of the rock will be faulted
downward. Rocks that are faulted upward
are called horsts, which eventually grow to become fault
mountains. Rocks that are faulted
downward are called grabens, which eventually grow to
become rift valleys between fault mountains. The term graben is derived from the German word for ditch. The steep cliff between a fault mountain and
a rift valley is called a fault scarp. The African Rift Valleys in southeastern
Africa is an example of fault mountains and rift
valleys. Thrust faults (subduction
zones) create volcanic arcs, either continental volcanic arcs such as the Andes
Mountains or volcanic island arcs such as the Aleutian Islands, the Japanese
Islands, and the Philippine Islands.
Most mountains are at the
bottom of the ocean, simply because most of the world is
covered with ocean. Some oceanic
mountains are volcanic island arcs that form from oceanic-oceanic subduction,
such as the Aleutian Islands, the Japanese Islands, and the Philippine
Islands. Other oceanic mountains are nemataths that form from hotspots caused by mantle plumes,
such as the Hawaiian Islands. Still
other oceanic mountains are oceanic ridges that form from oceanic-oceanic
divergent plate boundaries, such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
We have discussed the
formation of the Himalayas, the Appalachians, the Urals, the Atlas Mountains,
the Alps, the Caucasus Mountains, the African Rift Valleys, the Andes Mountains,
the Aleutian Islands, the Japanese Islands, the Philippine Islands, the
Hawaiian Islands, and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
However, there is one cordillera we have yet to
discuss: the Rocky Mountains. We
have avoided a discussion of these mountains because orologists
continue to debate how they formed. The
most popular theory to explain the formation of the Rocky Mountains is the
subduction of an oceanic plate underneath the western margin of the North
American plate. This theoretical oceanic
plate is called the Juan de Fuca plate. One argument in favor of this theory is the
three parallel mountain ranges near the west coast of North America: the Rocky
Mountains, the Cascade Range further west, and the Pacific Coastal Range
furthest west directly along the west coast of the North American
continent. As an oceanic plate subducts underneath a continental plate, some of the rock
that composes the subducting plate is heated and
melts into molten rock. This molten rock
rises and pushes itself through the overlying continental plate, forming a
mountain range. As the oceanic plate
continues to subduct deeper within the Earth, the
hotter temperatures melt more of its rock.
This molten rock rises and pushes itself through the overlying
continental plate, forming another mountain range parallel to the first
mountain range but toward the interior of the continent. As this process continues, the result is
mountain ranges on the continent that are parallel to one another and parallel
to the coastline where the oceanic plate is subducting. The same is true with the formation of the
Andes Mountains near the west coast of South America. As we discussed, the Nazca plate is currently
subducting underneath the western margin of the South
American plate, forming the Andes Mountains.
In actuality, the Andes Mountains are a collection of three parallel
mountain ranges: Cordillera Oriental furthest east, Cordillera Occidental to
the west, and the Chilean Coastal Range furthest west directly along the west
coast of the South American continent.
Further evidence that the
Rocky Mountains, the Cascade Range, and the Pacific Coastal Range formed from
the subduction of the Juan de Fuca plate underneath the North American plate is
the accretionary wedge along the west coast of North America. When an oceanic plate subducts
underneath a continental plate, the continental plate rips islands,
microcontinents, and entire island arcs off of the subducting oceanic plate.
These pieces stick to the continental plate, causing the continent to
grow larger and larger as the oceanic plate subducts
beneath it. This edge of the continent,
which is an amalgamation of islands, microcontinents, and island arcs that were
ripped off of a subducting
oceanic plate, is called an accretionary wedge, since accretion is the gaining
of mass through sticky collisions. Each
piece of an accretionary wedge has its own unique geology, different from the
geology of neighboring parts of the accretionary wedge. Each of these parts of an accretionary wedge with
its own unique geology is called a terrane. Caution: the common English word terrain is spelled differently.
The common English word terrain simply means a description of the
topography of a landscape, commonly known as the lay of the land. The western margin of North America is indeed
an accretionary wedge, since it is a collection of terranes, each with its own
unique geology, different from the geology of even neighboring terranes.
When the Earth first formed,
there were probably small accumulations of felsic igneous rock distributed
somewhat uniformly (evenly) throughout the lithosphere. These were the first microcontinents. As these ancient microcontinents were pushed by convection cells in the asthenosphere, some
of them collided with each other to form larger masses of felsic igneous
rock. These were the first small-sized
continents. These ancient small-sized
continents grew even larger as oceanic plates subducted
underneath them, since the continents ripped pieces off of
these oceanic plates as they subducted. Hence, the small-sized continents grew larger
by gaining accretionary wedges, eventually becoming medium-sized and even
large-sized continents. On occasion, all
the continents collided together to form an enormous landmass called a
supercontinent. We conclude that the
deep interior at the center of a modern-day continent was originally an ancient
microcontinent from when the Earth was much younger. Indeed, the oldest rocks in the entire world are found within the deep interiors at the centers of
modern-day continents. The ancient deep
interior at the center of a modern-day continent is called
the craton of the continent, originally an ancient microcontinent that first
formed billions of years ago when the Earth was young. As we will discuss shortly, these cratons are
composed of batholiths, enormous masses of intrusive/plutonic felsic igneous
rock.
If a tectonic plate becomes
heavier, it will sink into the asthenosphere.
If a tectonic plate becomes lighter, it will rise out of the
asthenosphere. This vertical motion of a
tectonic plate is called isostasy. For example, during the glacial period of an
ice age, water that evaporates from the oceans will form enormous ice sheets
upon continents. This extra weight will
push the continental plates downward into the asthenosphere. As another example of isostasy, at the end of
a glacial period of an ice age, the enormous ice sheets upon continents will
melt into liquid water that returns to the oceans. This removed weight permits the continental
plates to rise out of the asthenosphere.
As yet another example of isostasy, natural
forces degrade (weaken and destroy) mountains, breaking their rocks into
sediment. These same natural forces move
this sediment to other locations. Thus,
weight is removed from the mountains, causing that
particular part of the continental plate to become lighter. Hence, it will rise out of the
asthenosphere. In other words, as
mountains become shorter, they are buoyed upward to
become taller! The isostatic upward
motion of a continental plate is comparable to the shortening of mountains by
degradation. Hence, the actual elevation
of mountaintops above sea level only changes by small amounts as they are degraded by natural forces, since the shortened
mountain is compensated by the isostatic rising of the continental plate. A similar compensation occurs with
climatological effects upon sea level.
As we will discuss later in the course, we may naďvely predict sea level
to drop during the glacial period of an ice age, since water that has
evaporated from the oceans will form enormous ice sheets upon continents
instead of returning to the ocean through rivers. However, these enormous ice sheets also push
the continental plates into the asthenosphere, and hence we would predict that
sea level should rise relative to the sinking continents during the glacial
period of an ice age! The dropping sea
level from subtracted water is compensated by the
rising sea level relative to the isostatic sinking of the continental
plates. More plainly, continents and
oceans both drop together, and hence the actual change in sea level is
small. As we will also discuss later in
the course, we may naďvely predict sea level to rise at the end of a glacial
period of an ice age, since enormous ice sheets will now melt into liquid water
that will return to the oceans through rivers.
However, this removed weight permits the continental plates to rise out
of the asthenosphere, and hence we would predict that sea level should drop
relative to the rising continents at the end of a glacial period of an ice
age! The rising sea level from added
water is compensated by the dropping sea level
relative to the isostatic rising of the continental plates. More plainly, continents and oceans both rise
together, and hence the actual change in sea level is again small.
Seismology
Seismology is the study of
vibrations within the geosphere, and a seismologist is someone who studies
vibrations within the geosphere. These
words are derived from the Greek root seismo- for shake.
Any vibration in the geosphere is called
seismic activity, and earthquakes are the most powerful form of seismic
activity. Although seismic activity can
occur anywhere in the world, seismic activity is most clearly
understood at transform fault boundaries. At a transform fault boundary, tectonic
plates are pushed across each other. This slow, continuous motion of two tectonic
plates across each other at a transform fault boundary is
called fault creep. Since
tectonic plates are composed of rock, they are not smooth. Hence, fault creep results in frequent weak
vibrations as the tectonic plates scrape against each other. On occasion, the tectonic plates may become
stuck, but the convection cells within the asthenosphere continue to try to
push the tectonic plates across each other.
When there is active fault creep, the thermal energy (heat energy) of
the rock within the asthenosphere is being transformed
into the kinetic energy (moving energy) of the tectonic plates, as we
discussed. If there is not active creep,
the tectonic plates do not have kinetic energy (moving energy). Thus, the thermal energy (heat energy) of the
rock in the asthenosphere must be transformed instead
into elastic potential energy. Potential
energy is any form of stored energy, and elastic potential energy is
compressional stored energy. In other
words, if there is not active creep, the rock suffers from compression over
several years, perhaps several decades.
Eventually the rock rebounds to its original shape, releasing the stored
energy accumulated over several years or even several decades. The result is intense vibrations, an
earthquake. In other words, the mechanism
by which an earthquake occurs is the elastic rebound of compressed rock to its
original shape, liberating the potential (stored) energy. Note that all solids have elastic
properties. Just as
stretching an elastic band stores energy in the elastic band which can be
liberated by relaxing the elastic band, a rock or a table or a chair or a
mobile telephone can store energy by being compressed, and that stored energy
can be liberated by alleviating the applied pressure, thus causing the solid
object to elastically rebound to its original shape. If there is no active fault creep at a
transform fault boundary, then the transferred thermal energy of the rock
within the asthenosphere is being transformed into
elastic potential energy, thus compressing the rock. This stored energy is eventually liberated,
and hence a powerful earthquake is more likely to occur where there is no
active fault creep. If there is active
fault creep at a transform fault boundary, a significant fraction of the
thermal energy of the rock within the asthenosphere is being
transformed into kinetic energy, thus moving the tectonic plates. Hence, less energy is stored as elastic
potential energy, making a powerful earthquake less likely to occur where there
is active fault creep. In summary, a
powerful earthquake is less likely to occur at a transform fault boundary where
there is active creep, but a powerful earthquake is more likely to occur at a
transform fault boundary where there is no active creep!
As we discussed, seismic
waves propagate (travel) throughout the entire geosphere from any seismic
event. As we also discussed, there are
surface seismic waves that propagate (travel) along the surface of the
geosphere, and there are body seismic waves that propagate (travel) throughout
the interior of the geosphere. The two
types of body seismic waves are P-waves (pressure waves or primary waves) and
S-waves (shear-stress waves or secondary waves). A seismometer is a device that detects
seismic waves. The operation of a
seismometer is based on the principle of inertia, which states that it is more
difficult to change the motion of a more massive (heavier) object and it is
less difficult (easier) to change the motion of a less massive (lighter)
object. If an object is at rest, it has
a tendency to remain at rest, and a more massive (heavier) object has a greater
tendency to remain at rest. To build a
primitive seismometer, we suspend a very massive (very heavy) object from the
ceiling. This object is so massive
(heavy) that it will not move, even during intense vibrations. We attach writing utensils such as pencils to
the heavy object, and these writing utensils will make marks upon paper during
vibrations. The pencils make marks not
because the pencils move; the pencils are attached to
the massive (heavy) object, which does not move. The writing utensils make marks upon the
paper because the paper moves! We can
attach three mutually perpendicular writing utensils to the massive (heavy)
object to record vibrations in all three dimensions. The piece of paper with the pencil marks is
called a seismograph, the seismometer’s recording of
the detected seismic waves.
From the arrival times of the
P-waves and the S-waves, we can calculate the distance between the seismic
event and the seismometer, as we discussed.
However, this does not reveal precisely where the seismic event
occurred. For example, suppose we
calculate that a seismic event occurred one hundred kilometers from a
seismometer. Was the seismic event one
hundred kilometers to the north? Was the
seismic event one hundred kilometers to the west? Was the seismic event one hundred kilometers
to the southeast? We can draw a circle
with a radius of one hundred kilometers centered on the seismometer, and all we
can deduce is that the seismic event occurred somewhere on the circumference of
that circle. Suppose a second
seismometer at a different location, again using the arrival times of the
P-waves and the S-waves, reveals that the same seismic event occurred fifty
kilometers from that seismometer. We can
draw a circle with a radius of fifty kilometers centered on that seismometer,
and we can deduce that the seismic event occurred somewhere on the
circumference of that second circle.
However, if the seismic event occurred somewhere on the circumference of
the first circle and somewhere on the circumference of the second circle, then
the seismic event must have occurred somewhere on the intersection of these two
circles. In general, two circles
intersect at two different points. If we
had a third seismometer at a third location, we could construct a third circle
centered on that seismometer, and therefore the seismic event must have
occurred at the intersection of all three circles. In general, three circles intersect at a
single point. Therefore, to pinpoint the
precise location of a seismic event, we must use at least three
seismometers. The geometrical procedure
of finding the intersection of three circles is called
trilateration. Therefore, we determine
the precise location of a seismic event using trilateration.
The source of the seismic energy
from a seismic event is a point deep within the geosphere called the
focus. The seismic waves propagate
outward from the focus in all directions.
The point on the surface of the geosphere directly above the focus is called the epicenter, but the epicenter is not the source
of the seismic energy. Again, the focus
deep within the geosphere is the source of the seismic energy. However, while standing on the surface of the
geosphere, it appears as if the epicenter is the source of the seismic energy,
when in fact the source of the seismic energy is the focus deep within the
geosphere underneath the epicenter. As
seismic waves propagate outward, the total energy of the seismic event is spread over a larger and larger sphere. Hence, the seismic energy becomes
diluted, and seismometers further and further from the seismic event
will detect weaker and weaker vibrations.
Seismometers closer to the seismic event will detect stronger vibrations
from the same seismic event. The total
energy liberated from a seismic event is called the
magnitude of the seismic event, while the strength of vibrations detected by a
seismometer is called the local intensity of the vibrations. The local intensity measured by a seismometer
depends upon how near or how distant the seismometer is from the seismic
event. In other words, the local
intensity measured by a seismometer depends upon the distance of the
seismometer from the seismic event.
However, the magnitude of the seismic event is a fixed number, since it
is the total energy liberated by the seismic event. The Mercalli scale
is a local intensity scale, named for the Italian geologist and Catholic priest
Giuseppe Mercalli who formulated this scale in the
year 1902. Weaker vibrations measured by
a seismometer are lower numbers on the Mercalli
scale, while stronger vibrations measured by a seismometer are higher numbers
on the Mercalli scale. We can calculate the magnitude (the total
energy) liberated by the seismic event from the local intensity of the
vibrations measured by a seismometer together with the distance between the
seismic event and the seismometer, as determined from the arrival times of the
P-waves and the S-waves. The Richter
scale is a magnitude scale that measures the total energy liberated by seismic
events, named for the American seismologist Charles Francis Richter who
formulated this scale in the year 1935.
Less energetic seismic events have lower Richter magnitudes, while more energetic seismic events have higher Richter
magnitudes. The Richter scale is also a
logarithmic scale, meaning that higher Richter magnitudes are unimaginably more
powerful than lower Richter magnitudes, which are unimaginably weaker. In particular, every unit on the Richter
scale is roughly thirty times more powerful than the previous
unit on the Richter scale. For
example, a five on the Richter scale is roughly thirty times more powerful than
a four. A six on the Richter scale is
roughly thirty times more powerful than a five, which makes a six roughly nine
hundred (thirty times thirty) times more powerful than a four. A seven on the Richter scale is roughly
thirty times more powerful than a six, which makes a seven roughly nine hundred
(thirty times thirty) times more powerful than a five, which makes a seven
roughly twenty-seven thousand (thirty times thirty times thirty) times more
powerful than a four. This reveals that
higher Richter magnitudes are unimaginably more energetic than lower Richter
magnitudes, since we must multiply by a string of thirties to calculate their
relative energies. This also reveals
that lower Richter magnitudes are unimaginably less energetic than higher
Richter magnitudes, since we must divide by a string of thirties to calculate
their relative energies. Higher Richter
magnitude seismic events are much more rare, while
lower Richter magnitude seismic events are much more common. For example, there are roughly ten million
first-magnitude seismic events on planet Earth every year. This is roughly once every three
seconds! However, eighth-magnitude
earthquakes only occur roughly once a year on planet Earth. Ninth-magnitude earthquakes only occur
roughly once a decade on planet Earth, and tenth magnitude earthquakes only
occur roughly once a century on planet Earth.
Note that there is no upper limit to the Richter scale. Theoretically, an eleventh-magnitude
earthquake would only occur roughly once a millennium! There is also no lower limit to the Richter
scale. A zeroth-magnitude seismic event
is roughly thirty times weaker than a first-magnitude seismic event, and there
are roughly one hundred million zeroth-magnitude seismic events on planet Earth
every year. A negative-first-magnitude
seismic event is roughly thirty times weaker than a zeroth-magnitude seismic
event, and there are roughly one billion negative-first-magnitude seismic
events on planet Earth every year. A
negative-second-magnitude seismic event is roughly thirty times weaker than a
negative-first-magnitude seismic event, and there are roughly ten billion
negative-second-magnitude seismic events on planet Earth every year, and so on
and so forth.
Seismology was an inexact
science before the 1960s. In particular, all Richter magnitudes before
the 1960s were estimates, not exact
calculations. Seismology became an exact
science in the 1960s thanks to the underground
detonation of thermonuclear fusion bombs.
Throughout the 1950s, thermonuclear fusion
bombs were detonated above ground; entire islands in the Pacific Ocean were
obliterated during these above-ground tests. In the year 1963, the United States and the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (the U.S.S.R. or the Soviet Union) signed
the Limited Test Ban Treaty, banning the test-detonation of all nuclear weapons
underwater or above ground, including outer space. However, this treaty did not ban underground
detonations. Hence, when the United
States and the Soviet Union began test-detonating thermonuclear fusion bombs
underground, seismologists began detecting the resulting seismic waves. From knowing the precise location of the
detonated bomb and its precise energy yield, seismologists calibrated the
Richter scale into a precise energy scale.
For example, a Richter magnitude of 3.21 has an energy yield of one ton
of trinitrotoluene (one ton of TNT), a Richter magnitude of 5.21 has an energy
yield of one thousand tons of trinitrotoluene (one kiloton of TNT), and a
Richter magnitude of 7.21 has an energy yield of one million tons of
trinitrotoluene (one megaton of TNT).
Often, not all of the elastic
potential (stored) energy is liberated during an
earthquake. Several hours after the
earthquake, weaker vibrations may occur called aftershocks. Small amounts of energy may
also be liberated before the earthquake occurs. These are called
foreshocks. The word foreshock is derived from the word before. Our discussion of seismology may have given
the impression that earthquakes can only occur at transform fault boundaries
without active creep always following foreshocks. In actuality, we cannot predict when or where
an earthquake will occur. Firstly, an
earthquake may not be preceded by any foreshocks. Secondly, earthquakes not only occur at
transform fault boundaries without active creep; earthquakes may occur at
transform fault boundaries where there is active creep. Furthermore, earthquakes need not even occur
at transform fault boundaries.
Earthquakes also occur at convergent plate boundaries and at divergent
plate boundaries for example. Finally,
earthquakes need not even occur near plate boundaries. For example, it is a common
misconception that earthquakes in the United States can only occur near
its west coast due to the San Andreas Fault.
In actuality, earthquakes occur throughout the United States. The east coast of the United States is far
from any plate boundary, yet there are earthquakes near its east coast. Furthermore, these earthquakes are not
necessarily weak. In fact, some of the
most powerful earthquakes that have ever occurred in the United States have
occurred near its east coast. Geologists
do not yet understand how powerful earthquakes occur far from plate boundaries.
Vulcanology
Vulcanology is the study of igneous activity, and a vulcanologist is someone who studies igneous activity. These words are derived
from Vulcan, the ancient mythological Roman god of fire. The study of intrusive/plutonic igneous
activity deep within the Earth is simply called
intrusive/plutonic vulcanology, while the study of
extrusive/volcanic igneous activity near the surface of the Earth is simply
called extrusive/volcanic vulcanology. Not much is known
about intrusive/plutonic vulcanology, since we cannot
directly observe the deep interior of the geosphere. Therefore, most of our discussion will be
devoted to extrusive/volcanic vulcanology, although
we will briefly discuss our limited knowledge of intrusive/plutonic
volcanology.
Intrusive molten rock deep
within the geosphere is called magma, while extrusive
molten rock near the surface of the geosphere is called lava. Magma is not just molten rock; magma is actually
a mixture of molten rock, solid rocks, and gases. The molten (liquid) component of magma is called the melt.
The solid rocks mixed within the melt are called
the crystallized solids. The gases
trapped within magma are called the volatiles. The volatiles within magma are primarily
water vapor and secondarily carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen, and other gases.
We can classify molten rock,
both magma and lava, based on its mineral composition. Since the vast majority of all minerals are
silicate minerals, we therefore classify molten rock, both magma and lava,
based on its silicate composition. In
this course, we will refer to molten rock, either magma or lava, composed
predominantly of dark silicates as mafic molten rock, since such molten rock when
cooled will crystallize to form mafic igneous rock. In particular, mafic magma crystallizes to
form gabbro since gabbro is an intrusive/plutonic mafic igneous rock, while
mafic lava crystallizes to form basalt since basalt is an extrusive/volcanic mafic
igneous rock. In this course, we will
refer to molten rock, either magma or lava, composed predominantly of light
silicates as felsic molten rock, since such molten rock when cooled will
crystallize to form felsic igneous rock.
In particular, felsic magma crystallizes to form granite since granite
is an intrusive/plutonic felsic igneous rock, while felsic lava crystallizes to
form rhyolite since rhyolite is an extrusive/volcanic felsic igneous rock. In this course, we will refer to molten rock,
either magma or lava, composed predominantly of intermediate silicates as
intermediate molten rock, since such molten rock when cooled will crystallize
to form intermediate igneous rock. In
particular, intermediate magma crystallizes to form diorite since diorite is an
intrusive/plutonic intermediate igneous rock, while intermediate lava
crystallizes to form andesite since andesite is an extrusive/volcanic
intermediate igneous rock. Since
continental plates are composed predominantly of felsic rock, we find felsic
magma underneath these continental plates.
If this felsic magma extrudes out of the continent, it becomes felsic
lava. Since oceanic plates are composed
predominantly of mafic rock, we find mafic magma underneath oceanic plates,
which are themselves at the bottom of the ocean. If this mafic magma extrudes out of the ocean
basins at the ocean floor, it becomes mafic lava.
As we discussed, quartz is a
light silicate, and molten quartz is called
silica. Hence, we redefine felsic molten
rock as either magma or lava composed of the greatest quantity of silica. We also redefine mafic molten rock as either
magma or lava composed of the least quantity of silica. Finally, we redefine intermediate molten rock
as either magma or lava composed of intermediate quantities of silica. The quantity of silica within molten rock
determines the viscosity of the molten rock.
The viscosity of any fluid is a measure of the internal friction within
the fluid. A high viscosity fluid has much internal friction, thus making it difficult for the
high viscosity fluid to flow. A low
viscosity fluid has little internal friction, thus making it easier for the low
viscosity fluid to flow. For example,
honey and molasses have high viscosity, and indeed honey and molasses do not
flow easily. Liquid water by comparison
has a low viscosity, and indeed liquid water does flow much more easily than
honey or molasses. Since felsic molten
rock is composed of the most silica, felsic molten rock is most viscous. If high viscosity felsic lava extrudes out of
a continent, it will build a tall, steep volcano, since the high viscosity
felsic lava cannot flow far before it cools and crystallizes into
rhyolite. These tall, steep volcanoes on
continents are called stratovolcanoes. Since mafic molten rock is composed of the
least silica, mafic molten rock is least viscous. If low viscosity mafic lava extrudes out of
an ocean basin, it will build a wide, shallow volcano, since the low viscosity
mafic lava can flow far before it cools and crystallizes into basalt. These wide, shallow volcanoes in the ocean are called shield volcanoes, such as the Hawaiian Islands
for example.
When an oceanic plate subducts underneath a continental plate, the oceanic plate
melts into mafic magma with the least quantities of silica. Underneath the continental plate, there is
felsic magma with the greatest quantities of silica. Hence, the low-silica mafic magma mixes with
the high-silica felsic magma to form intermediate magma with intermediate
quantities of silica at these subduction zones.
This intermediate magma may extrude out of the overlying continent,
becoming intermediate lava. For example,
the Andes Mountains near the west coast of South America formed from the
subduction of the Nazca plate underneath the west coast of the South American
plate, as we discussed. The mixture of
the mafic magma from the melting Nazca plate and the felsic magma underneath
the South American plate forms intermediate magma, which extrudes out of the
South American plate as intermediate lava.
Therefore, the Andes Mountains are built from
intermediate igneous activity. Andesite
is an extrusive/volcanic intermediate igneous rock, and indeed andesite is named for the Andes Mountains, much of which is composed
of andesite.
When magma deep within the
geosphere extrudes out of the geosphere to become lava, the trapped volatiles are liberated from the molten rock. This is an important distinction between
magma and lava. Magma is not only
intrusive/plutonic molten rock deep within the geosphere; magma also has large
quantities of volatiles trapped within it.
Lava is not only extrusive/volcanic molten rock near the surface of the
geosphere; lava has also liberated most of its volatiles. This significant difference warrants these two
different terms for molten rock, magma for intrusive molten rock deep within
the geosphere and lava for extrusive molten rock near the surface of the
geosphere. The large quantities of
silica within felsic magma are able to trap an abundance of volatiles within
it. Hence, when felsic lava erupts from
a stratovolcano, an enormous amount of trapped volatiles are
liberated. Thus, stratovolcanoes have
the most violent eruptions. These
eruptions are often explosive; a stratovolcano can obliterate itself when it
erupts! The small quantities of silica
within mafic magma can only trap a small amount of volatiles within it. Hence, when mafic lava erupts from a shield
volcano, only small quantities of trapped volatiles are liberated. Thus, shield volcanoes have the most gentle eruptions.
For example, the active volcanoes on the easternmost Big Hawaiian Island
suffer from continuous but very gentle eruptions. These eruptions are so quiet that there are
actually vulcanologists living on the side of these
active volcanoes directly studying these gentle but continuous eruptions!
It is not
just lava that extrudes from igneous activity. Gases are also
liberated, primarily water vapor and secondarily carbon dioxide, methane,
nitrogen, and other gases. These gases
were formerly the trapped volatiles within the magma deep within the
geosphere. The liberation of gases from
igneous activity is called outgassing. Solids are also ejected
from igneous activity; these solids are called pyroclastic materials. The smallest type of pyroclastic material is
ash, which is small enough and therefore light enough to drift in the Earth’s
atmosphere. Other pyroclastic materials
are heavy enough that after ejecting from the eruption, the Earth’s gravity
pulls them back downward onto the side of the volcano or onto the surrounding
landscapes. With every eruption from a
volcano, pyroclastic materials are ejected, many of which land on the side of
the volcano. Eventually, many layers of
pyroclastic materials on the side of the volcano will slide down the
volcano. This landslide composed
primarily of pyroclastic materials is called a
lahar. With each lahar, pyroclastic
materials slide down the volcano and land at the base of the volcano. After many lahars, an accumulation of pyroclastic
materials builds a small volcano at the base of the major volcano. This small volcano is
called a cinder cone. These
cinder cones are the most common type of volcano. Caution: the definition of a volcano is not a
mountain with lava extruding out from it, as is commonly believed. The strict definition of a volcano is any
landform built from extrusive igneous activity.
Lava is not required to extrude out of a landform for it to satisfy this
definition and be classified as a volcano. Since cinder cones are indeed landforms built
from extrusive igneous activity, they are classified
as a type of volcano. Lava could still
extrude out of a cinder cone, since lava is not required to extrude out of a
major volcano or any volcano for that matter.
Lava may extrude out from any location on the surface of the
geosphere. In fact, on most occasions
lava does not extrude out of volcanoes.
Most extrusive igneous activity is from fissures, cracks on the surface
of the geosphere from which lava may erupt.
Any landform built from
extrusive igneous activity is called a volcano. Therefore, any landform built from intrusive
igneous activity should properly be called a plutano. However,
all vulcanologists call any landform built from
intrusive igneous activity a pluton. If
magma deep within the geosphere flows within a fault and cools, it may
crystalize into an intrusive/plutonic landform.
These plutons are called dikes. Two other types of plutons are sills and
laccoliths. Mafic molten rock flows
easily, since it has low viscosity.
Hence, when mafic magma deep within the geosphere cools, it may
crystallize to form wide and thin intrusive/plutonic landforms. These plutons are called
sills, since they are similar in shape to a windowsill. Felsic molten rock does not flow easily,
since it has high viscosity. Hence, when
felsic magma deep within the geosphere cools, it may crystallize to form bulged
intrusive/plutonic landforms. These
plutons are called laccoliths. The largest laccoliths in the world are called batholiths.
These batholiths compose cratons, the deep and ancient interiors of
continents. Not much more is known about plutons or intrusive igneous activity in
general, since it occurs deep within the geosphere.
The entire margin of the Pacific
Ocean is subduction zones, resulting in igneous activity nearly everywhere
along the margin of the Pacific Ocean.
This is called the Pacific Ring of Fire. The Andes Mountains on the west coast of
South America are volcanically active.
The Aleutian Islands in Alaska are volcanically active. There is igneous activity in the Japanese
Islands and the Philippine Islands.
There is also igneous activity near the west coast of North
America. For example, Mount Saint Helens
in the Cascade Range suffered from a violent eruption in the year 1980.
Every igneous eruption ejects
pyroclastic materials, and the smallest type of pyroclastic material is
ash. This ejected ash is small enough
and therefore light enough to drift in the Earth’s atmosphere. A single igneous eruption could be powerful
enough to eject enough ash into the atmosphere to surround the entire planet,
significantly reducing the amount of incoming sunlight to the Earth. The result is global cooling, significantly
cold temperatures across the entire planet.
For example, the eruption of Laki Fissure in
Iceland in June 1783 caused the winter of late 1783 to early 1784 to be
bitterly cold. Benjamin Franklin was the
first person to propose that the eruption of Laki
Fissure was responsible for that bitterly cold winter. Benjamin Franklin was one of the greatest
founding fathers of the United States; he signed both the Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution of the United States for example. Benjamin Franklin was also a brilliant scientist;
he discovered lightning is electricity and invented the lightning rod and
bifocal glasses for example. Benjamin
Franklin also mapped ocean currents in the North Atlantic Ocean, as we will
discuss later in the course. The
eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia in April 1815
caused the year 1816 to be so cold that that year is commonly known as the Year
Without a Summer; there was heavy snow in June and
frost in July and August of that year!
The eruption of Mount Krakatoa/Krakatau in Indonesia in August 1883
caused five years of global cooling. The
eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in June 1991 caused a measurable
cooling of planet Earth.
The Newhall-Self scale is a
volcanic explosivity scale, named for the American
geologists Christopher Newhall and Stephen Self who together formulated this
scale in the year 1982. Lower numbers on
the Newhall-Self scale are more gentle igneous eruptions that occur more
frequently, while higher numbers on the Newhall-Self scale are more violent
igneous eruptions that are more rare. The continuous but gentle eruptions of the
volcanoes on the easternmost Big Hawaiian Island rank zero, the lowest rank, on
the Newhall-Self scale. Eruptions of
rank one on the Newhall-Self scale occur roughly once per day, eruptions of
rank two on the Newhall-Self scale occur roughly once per week, and eruptions
of rank three on the Newhall-Self scale occur roughly once per month. The eruption of Laki
Fissure in the year 1783 ranks four on the Newhall-Self scale. Such eruptions occur roughly once per
year. The eruption of Mount Saint Helens
in the year 1980 and the eruption of Mount Vesuvius anno Domini 79, which
destroyed several ancient Roman cities such as Pompeii, both rank five on the
Newhall-Self scale. Such eruptions occur
roughly once per decade. The eruption of
Mount Krakatoa/Krakatau in the year 1883 and the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in
the year 1991 both rank six on the Newhall-Self scale. Such eruptions occur roughly once per
century. The eruption of Mount Tambora in the year 1815 ranks seven on the Newhall-Self
scale. Such eruptions occur roughly once
per millennium. The last eruption of the
underground supervolcano Yellowstone roughly 630,000
years ago ranks eight, the highest rank, on the Newhall-Self scale. Such eruptions occur roughly once every ten
thousand years. If the underground supervolcano Yellowstone were to erupt again, it would
cause a catastrophic loss of life across much of the North American continent.
Paleogeology
Paleogeology is the study of the ancient geosphere, and a paleogeologist is someone who studies the ancient
geosphere. These words are derived from the Greek root paleo- for ancient. The ultimate goal of paleogeology
is to determine the history of planet Earth, and all of the information about
the history of planet Earth that is recorded in rocks
is called the rock record. In
determining the history of planet Earth, we must make a distinction between
relative dating and absolute dating.
With relative dating, we can determine the events of Earth history and
even the correct ordering of these events, but we cannot determine how long ago
these events occurred. In other words,
relative dating reveals that event A was followed by event B which
was itself followed by event C for example, but relative dating does not reveal
how long ago these events occurred. Did
these events occur thousands of years ago?
Did they occur millions of years ago?
Did they occur billions of years ago?
Relative dating cannot answer these questions. Absolute dating does reveal how long ago
events in Earth history occurred. Paleogeologists have actually succeeded in determining the
events in Earth history and their proper order using relative dating. Therefore, most of our discussion on paleogeology will be in the context of relative
dating. We will however conclude our
discussion of paleogeology with a brief overview of
absolute dating.
As we discussed, sedimentary
rock lithifies from layers of sediments.
A layer of lithified sedimentary rock is called
a stratum. This word stratum is derived
from a Latin word meaning layer. The lower strata of sedimentary rock are
older since they were deposited first, and higher
strata of sedimentary rock are younger since they were deposited later on top
of the lower strata. This obvious truth
is the most fundamental technique of relative dating and is
called the Law of Superposition.
Another technique of relative dating is the Principle of Original
Horizontality, which states that a geologic event that folded sedimentary rock
for example must have occurred later (more recently) than the lithification of the sediments that initially formed the
sedimentary rock. More plainly,
sedimentary rock forms originally horizontally, hence the name of this
technique of relative dating. Another
technique of relative dating is the Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships,
which states that anything that cuts across strata of sedimentary rock such as
a fault for example must have occurred later (more recently) than the lithification of the sediments that initially formed the
sedimentary rock. A fossil is the
remains of any ancient organism that has been lithified
into rock. Fossils are found within
sedimentary rock in a certain particular order, the order of biological
evolution (from less evolved to more evolved).
This is called the Principle of Fossil
Succession, and it is another technique of relative dating. There are some species of organisms that only
existed on this planet for a brief period of time,
perhaps only a few million years.
Whenever we find such a fossil in one stratum in one rock formation, we
can be certain that that stratum corresponds with another stratum in another
rock formation with the same fossil.
These valuable fossils are called index
fossils, and they provide an essential technique of relative dating.
Roughly one century ago, the oldest rocks paleogeologists
discovered were roughly five hundred and fifty million years old. Therefore, paleogeologists
formerly believed that planet Earth is roughly that age. It was only later that much older rocks were discovered within cratons, the deep interiors at the
centers of modern-day continents. Paleogeologists eventually concluded that planet Earth is
nearly ten times older, roughly 4.6 billion years old. Nevertheless, paleogeologists
roughly a century ago took what they believed was the entire
history of planet Earth and divided it into three eras: the Paleozoic
Era, the Mesozoic Era, and the Cenozoic Era.
The Greek root paleo- means ancient, as we discussed, and the Greek root
zoo- means animal. For example, zoology
is the study of animals, a zoologist is someone who studies animals, and humans
visit animals in a zoo. Paleogeologists use the Greek root zoo- for life in general,
not just animal life. Therefore, the
term Paleozoic Era literally means the era of ancient life. The Greek root meso-
means middle, as we discussed, and again paleogeologists
use the Greek root zoo- for life in general.
Therefore, the term Mesozoic Era literally means the era of middle
life. The Greek root ceno-
means recent, and therefore the term Cenozoic Era literally means the era of
recent life. Today, paleogeologists
understand that these three eras together only constitute the most recent five
hundred and fifty million years of Earth history. The first four billion years of Earth history
is placed into an extremely long period of time called
the Precambrian. In summary, the first
four billion years of the history of planet Earth is the Precambrian followed
by the Paleozoic Era (the era of ancient life) followed by the Mesozoic Era
(the era of middle life) followed by the Cenozoic Era (the era of recent life).
Because of the rock cycle,
rocks are continuously changing from one type to another. Hence, it is more likely for an old rock to
have already changed into another younger rock; that is, it is less likely for
an old rock to remain the same type of rock to the present day. Therefore, young rocks are more common, while
old rocks are more rare. As a result, the rock record is more and more scarce as paleogeologists
attempt to push our understanding of the history of the Earth further and
further backward in time. Paleogeologists have determined recent Earth history, over
tens of millions of years, in detail. Paleogeologists are less certain about what occurred in
Earth history hundreds of millions of years ago, and paleogeologists
are most uncertain about what occurred in Earth history billions of years
ago. As we discussed, the Earth formed almost entirely molten.
Hence, there were virtually no rocks when the Earth first formed, and
therefore there is no rock record left from the actual formation of the
Earth. Without a rock record, paleogeologists will never know with certainty what occurred
during the earliest periods of Earth history.
We have deduced that the Earth formed almost entirely
molten and differentiated itself into a core, mantle, and crust from the
laws of physics, not from the rock record.
The Precambrian began when
the Earth formed roughly 4.6 billion years ago and ended roughly five hundred
and fifty million years ago. At the
beginning of the Precambrian, the Earth formed almost
entirely molten and differentiated itself into a most dense metallic
core, a less dense mantle composed of iron-rich silicate rock, and a least
dense crust composed of iron-poor silicate rock. The felsic parts of the lithosphere were the
first microcontinents, which collided with one another to form small-sized
continents. The small-sized continents
eventually became medium-sized and even large-sized continents as oceanic
plates subducted beneath them, as we discussed. We will discuss the formation of the Earth’s
atmosphere and the Earth’s oceans later in the course. Roughly one billion years after the Earth
formed (roughly 3.6 billion years ago), the most primitive lifeforms evolved in
the Earth’s oceans. These lifeforms were
unicellular microorganisms, such as bacteria and blue-green algae. Over billions of years, these primitive
lifeforms transformed the composition of the Earth’s atmosphere, as we will
discuss later in the course. Eventually,
some of these unicellular microorganisms evolved into multicellular
microorganisms. By the end of the
Precambrian, the most primitive macroscopic organisms had evolved, such as
invertebrate animals. All life that ever
existed throughout the entire Precambrian was entirely in the Earth’s oceans.
The Paleozoic Era began
roughly five hundred and fifty million years ago and ended roughly two hundred
and fifty million years ago. The
beginning of the Paleozoic Era is commonly known as
the age of invertebrates, since the most evolved organisms on this planet were
invertebrate animals, such as modern-day jellyfish. Over many millions of years, some invertebrate
animals evolved into vertebrate animals.
The most primitive vertebrate animals are fishes, which can only breathe
underwater with gills. The first fish
that evolved were the jawless fish, such as certain modern-day species of
eel. Over many millions of years, some
of the jawless fish evolved into cartilaginous fish, such as modern-day sharks
and rays. Over many more millions of
years, some of the cartilaginous fish evolved into bony fish, such as modern-day
tuna and salmon. Hence, the middle of
the Paleozoic Era is commonly known as the age of
fishes. By the end of the Paleozoic Era,
some of the fishes evolved into amphibians.
The strict definition of an amphibian is a vertebrate animal that spends
its infancy breathing underwater with gills, loses its gills during adolescence
and grows lungs, and spends its adulthood breathing air with lungs. Examples of modern-day amphibians include
frogs, toads, and salamanders. Hence,
the end of the Paleozoic Era is commonly known as the
age of amphibians. As some fish evolved
into amphibians, there must have been vertebrate animals that were intermediate
between fish (which can only breathe underwater with gills) and amphibians
(which as adults can only breathe air with lungs). These intermediate vertebrate animals may
have required both gills and lungs to breathe.
A modern-day example of such an intermediate vertebrate animal is the
lungfish, which has both gills and lungs.
Some species of lungfish must inhale air with their lungs and must
exhale underwater with their gills.
At the end of the Paleozoic
Era, some amphibians evolved further to become reptiles. The strict definition of a reptile is a
vertebrate animal that spends its entire life breathing air with lungs after
hatching from a hard-shelled egg.
Examples of modern-day reptiles include alligators, crocodiles, lizards,
turtles, tortoises, and snakes. The
entire Mesozoic Era is commonly known as the age of
reptiles. Since the dinosaurs were
particularly dominant during this era, the entire Mesozoic Era is also commonly known as the age of dinosaurs. The Mesozoic Era began roughly two hundred
and fifty million years ago and ended roughly sixty-six million years ago.
At the end of the Mesozoic
Era, most of the organisms on planet Earth suddenly became extinct, thus ending
the Mesozoic Era and beginning the Cenozoic Era. During the Cenozoic Era, the mammals are the
most evolved organisms on this planet.
Hence, the entire Cenozoic Era is commonly known
as the age of mammals. A mammal is a vertebrate
animal that spends its entire life breathing air with lungs after being born
live. The strict definition of a mammal
is a vertebrate animal where the females feed their young with mammary glands,
hence the term mammal. As mammals
evolved, there must have been vertebrate animals that were intermediate between
reptiles (which lay and hatch from eggs) and mammals (which are born
live). A modern-day example of such an
intermediate vertebrate is the platypus, which although it is a mammal
nevertheless lays and hatches from eggs.
Mammals are also endothermic, commonly known as warm-blooded, while all
the other vertebrate animals we have discussed are ectothermic, commonly known
as cold-blooded. The term endothermic
actually means able to maintain internal temperature with little dependence
upon the external (surrounding) environmental temperature. The Greek root endo- means inside or within,
and the Greek root thermo- means temperature in words such as thermometer for
example. Also,
the term ectothermic actually means unable to maintain internal temperature due
to strong dependence upon the external (surrounding) environmental
temperature. The Greek root ecto- means outside or without, and again the Greek root
thermo- means temperature. Ectothermic
animals are not particularly adaptable, since they can only regulate their body
temperatures within a narrow range of the external (surrounding) environmental
temperature. Mammals are endothermic;
they are able to regulate their body temperatures over a fairly
wide range of the external (surrounding) environmental temperature. As a result, mammals are extraordinarily
adaptable, and indeed mammals have adapted to live in every environment on
planet Earth. This makes the diversity
of mammals enormous. Examples
of modern-day mammals include rodents (mice, rats, hamsters, gerbils, lemmings,
muskrats, voles, guinea pigs, porcupines, gophers, beavers, squirrels,
chipmunks, groundhogs/woodchucks, and prairie dogs), lagomorphs (rabbits and
hares), moles, shrews, hedgehogs, bats, anteaters, sloths, hyenas, mongooses,
felids (cats, lions, tigers, leopards, jaguars, cheetahs, cougars/pumas, and
lynxes), canids (dogs, wolves, coyotes, jackals, and foxes), ursids (bears), raccoons, mustelids (weasels, badgers,
ferrets, minks, wolverines, and otters), skunks, aardvarks, pinnipeds (seals
and walruses), elephants, equids (horses, donkeys, and zebras), rhinoceroses,
tapirs, bovids (cattle, bison, buffaloes, antelopes,
yaks, sheep, and goats), suids (swine), giraffes,
camelids (camels and llamas), cervids (deer, elk,
moose, and reindeer), hippopotami, and cetaceans (whales, dolphins, and
porpoises). Late in the Cenozoic
Era, the most intelligent group of mammals evolved: the primates (lemurs,
monkeys, baboons, gibbons, orangutans, gorillas, and chimpanzees). Even later in the Cenozoic Era, the most
intelligent group of primates evolved, making them the most evolved mammals and
therefore the most evolved organisms on planet Earth: humans. The first species of humans evolved roughly
four million years ago, and the particular species Homo sapiens evolved much more recently, very roughly two hundred
thousand years ago. Homo sapiens are the most evolved organisms on Earth because they
are sentient, meaning that they are consciously aware of their own existence,
consciously aware of the existence of the world around them, and can express
abstract ideas with spoken language. The
Cenozoic Era (the age of mammals) began roughly sixty-six million years ago and
continues to the present day.
Note that there is a clear
evolutionary progression of vertebrate animals, from fish to
amphibians to reptiles to mammals.
We see this clear evolutionary progression when we study not just the
anatomy of vertebrate animals but also the physiology of vertebrate
animals. Consider the respiratory
systems of vertebrate animals for example.
Fish are only able to breathe underwater with gills. Amphibians spend their infancy breathing
underwater with gills and spend their adulthood breathing air with lungs. Reptiles spend their entire lives breathing
air with lungs after hatching from hard-shelled eggs. Mammals spend their entire lives breathing
air with lungs after being born live.
Note the clear evolutionary progression of the vertebrate respiratory
system from fish to amphibians to reptiles to mammals. Consider the cardiovascular/circulatory
systems of vertebrate animals as another example. Fish have a two-chambered heart. Amphibians have a three-chambered heart. Reptiles have a three-and-a-half chambered
heart. Mammals have a four-chambered
heart. Note the clear evolutionary
progression of the vertebrate cardiovascular/circulatory system from fish to
amphibians to reptiles to mammals.
Consider the nervous systems of vertebrate animals as
yet another example. The fish
brain has an enormous medulla oblongata, a medium-sized cerebellum, and a tiny
cerebrum. The amphibian brain has a
smaller medulla oblongata, and the reptile brain has an even smaller medulla
oblongata. Finally, the mammal brain has
a tiny medulla oblongata, a medium-sized cerebellum, and an enormous
cerebrum. Note the clear evolutionary
progression of the vertebrate nervous system from fish to amphibians to
reptiles to mammals. With each
physiological system, we see a clear evolutionary progression from fish to
amphibians to reptiles to mammals. Birds
are regarded as intermediate in evolution between
reptiles and mammals. For example, birds
hatch from hard-shelled eggs like reptiles, but birds are endothermic like
mammals. In the correct order from less
evolved to more evolved, the vertebrate animals include jawless fish,
cartilaginous fish, bony fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. There are also vertebrate animals that are
intermediate in evolution between these classes, such as the lungfish
(intermediate between bony fish and amphibians) and the platypus (intermediate
between birds and mammals).
Once every roughly one
hundred million years, almost all the organisms on planet Earth suddenly become
extinct. This is
called an extinction level event.
The most recent extinction level event ended the Mesozoic Era and began
the Cenozoic Era roughly sixty-six million years ago. One theory to explain extinction level events
is the asteroid-impact theory. An asteroid
is a large chunk of metal and rock in outer space. According to the asteroid-impact theory, once
every roughly one hundred million years, an asteroid falls from outer space
toward the Earth and collides with the surface of the Earth. It is not difficult to calculate that such a
collision would unleash roughly one thousand times the combined nuclear arsenal
of the entire world! This much liberated energy would completely obliterate all life
at and near the point of impact. In
addition, this much energy would shatter the asteroid into innumerable
extremely hot fragments that would shoot outward from the point of impact and
then rain back downward, igniting global forest fires and heating most of the
Earth’s atmosphere to inhospitable temperatures, eradicating life over an even
larger area. Most significantly, this
much energy would pulverize rock at the point of impact into dust and ash, and
the force of the collision would eject that dust and ash into the atmosphere,
surrounding the entire planet and blocking most sunlight for several months,
perhaps even a couple years. Without
sunlight, most plants would die, since plants require the energy of sunlight to
synthesize their own food (photosynthesis).
Most herbivorous animals would then die, since herbivores eat
plants. Most carnivorous animals would
then die, since carnivores eat herbivores.
The result is an extinction level event, when most of the organisms
across the entire planet suddenly become extinct. In the late 1970s,
a crater was discovered in Yucatán in Mexico, named
the Chicxulub crater. This crater is
roughly the correct size that would be caused by an
asteroid impact. The Chicxulub crater is
also the correct age, having formed at the stratum of sedimentary rock between
the end of the Mesozoic Era and the beginning of the Cenozoic Era. Finally, this stratum of rock is rich in
dense elemental metals such as iridium and osmium that are less abundant on the
surface of the Earth but more abundant in asteroids. Indeed, this stratum of rock between the end
of the Mesozoic Era and the beginning of the Cenozoic Era is rich in iridium
and osmium throughout the entire planet.
Hence, this asteroid-impact theory for extinction level events has been proven, at least for the most recent extinction level
event that ended the Mesozoic Era and began the Cenozoic Era. We are certain an extinction level event
occurs once every roughly one hundred million years from the sudden
disappearance of fossils within the rock record. From the observations of the orbits of
asteroids around the Sun relative to the Earth’s orbit around the Sun and
calculating probabilities, we estimate that an asteroid should collide with the
Earth once every roughly one hundred million years. This further supports the theory that all
extinction level events are caused by asteroid
impacts. There are other theories to
explain extinction level events however.
Another theory states that roughly once every one hundred million years,
there is an accumulation of poisonous gases within the oceans from a sudden
increase in submarine volcanic activity.
These poisonous gases would kill most life in the oceans. In addition, these poisonous gases would
bubble out of the oceans, also killing most life on the continents. Perhaps all of the poisonous gases in the
oceans accumulate at a certain location within the ocean and bubble out of the
ocean as a single burst, killing most life on the continents. To summarize this alternative theory, once
every roughly one hundred million years, the ocean flatulates
(farts), and the stink kills most life on Earth!
The most reliable method of
absolute dating is radioactive dating.
As we discussed, certain atoms in the universe are radioactive, meaning that
their nucleus is unstable because it has too much energy. A radioactive nucleus emits particles to
lower its own energy to achieve greater stability. The original radioactive atom is called the parent atom, and the new atom transmuted from
the original atom is called the daughter atom.
The radioactive half-life is the amount of time it takes for one-half of
the radioactive parent to transmute into a more stable daughter. This means that after two half-lives,
one-fourth of the radioactive parent remains, since one-half of one-half is
one-fourth. After three half-lives,
one-eighth of the radioactive parent remains, since one-half of one-half of
one-half is one-eighth. After four
half-lives, one-sixteenth of the radioactive parent remains, since one-half of
one-half of one-half of one-half is one-sixteenth. Hence, by measuring the quantity of
radioactive parent within a rock, we can determine how many half-lives have
passed since the formation of the rock.
The half-life of the radioactive carbon-fourteen isotope is roughly six thousand years. Hence, this radioactive isotope is used to date comparatively young rocks. The half-life of the radioactive uranium-235 isotope is roughly seven hundred million
years. Hence, this radioactive isotope is used to date comparatively
middle-aged rocks. The half-life of the
radioactive uranium-238 isotope is roughly 4.5 billion years. Hence, this radioactive isotope is used to date comparatively old rocks. Using radioactive dating, paleogeologists have determined that the Cenozoic Era began roughly
sixty-six million years ago, the Mesozoic Era began roughly two hundred and
fifty million years ago, and the Paleozoic Era began roughly five hundred and
fifty million years ago. The oldest
rocks that paleogeologists have ever dated are
roughly 4.5 billion years old. We assume
that planet Earth is slightly older than these oldest rocks, since the Earth
was born almost entirely molten when there were no
rocks, leaving no rock record available to us from the Earth’s initial
formation. Hence, a somewhat more
accurate estimate for the age of the Earth is roughly 4.6 billion years.
copyeditor: Michael Brzostek (Spring2023)
Libarid A. Maljian homepage at the Department of Physics at CSLA at NJIT
Libarid A. Maljian profile at the Department of Physics at CSLA at NJIT
Department of Physics at CSLA at NJIT
College of Science and Liberal Arts at NJIT
New Jersey Institute of Technology
This webpage was most recently modified on Wednesday, the sixteenth day of October, anno Domini MMXXIV, at 03:45 ante meridiem EDT.