Activity Based Costing
Is now receiving more attention because of need to meet pressure and prices due to increased competition.
What it does is
prorate overhead and support cost (indirect) incurred to produce a product or service ore
precisely. This allows obtaining a truer
cost.
Overhead costs
used to be a small component of the total cost (direct material and direct labor accounted
for the majority cost). To say the direct
labor cost % has shrunk while overhead cost % making it necessary to:
1. Understanding its composition
2. Determine it more precisely
3. Control it more effectively
4. Have a basis for managing it
By
allocating the cost of an overhead activity on the basis of direct consumption needed to
produce the product or service (for instance purchasing department cost)
would:
a) Charge a produce that involves a lot of
purchased parts with a higher cost.
b) Show excess capacity (i.e. cost) if say
the purchasing department costs were not 95% consumed as a consequence of purchasing
activity required.
c) Serve as the basis for overhead cost
justification Allow more precise valuation of cost of goods sold and inventories than one
that only used it minimally.
Activity
based costing is:
1) Expensive to set up
2) Expensive to maintain since it requires
updating
3) Requires estimate by management where
activity consumption cannot be measured
4) Not 100% accurate but is an improvement
over the average production level allocation method
5) Facilitated by computers. Could not be done cost wise without computer
6) Most effectively employed in
industries/organizations where:
a) There is need to control and reduce
cost in order to maintain profits
b) Where overhead costs are large
Activity
based costing like any cost accounting method does not deal well with complex cost
allocation to departments, products, divisions ect. of generic and administrative costs.
Definitions
Cost Pool. A group of individual costs that is allocated using a single cost driver. (Done to reduce accounting costs. There costs should be related to the cost drivers)
Customer
Driver- Output measure that motivates overhead activity cost.
(i.e. salaries of support personnel driver by hours required to service products)
A more detailed example contrasting traditional product costing and ABC Method of product costing for part 25 being produced in Dept A, of Plant X, of Company Y is shown (to keep things simple we are assuming the production is done in one department. In practice most likely a number of departments will be involved, each one adding cost)
Annual
production quantity projected to be produced is 100,000 units. Estimated direct cost for the 100,000 units of
Part A is:
Direct
Material Cost $ 300,000
Direct Labor
Cost $ 192,000
Dept A
Annual budgeted indirect cost and related activity
(It produces a variety of other parts in addition to Part A)
Estimated
total annual direct labor cost - $ 1,650,000
for Plant X
|
Annual Cost |
Total Annual Activity |
Unit Cost |
Quality |
1,600,000 |
10,000 pieces
scrapped |
$160 |
Set Up |
1,200,000 |
500 set ups |
$2,400 |
Shipping |
600,000 |
60,000 orders
shipped |
$10 |
Administrative |
200,000 |
1000 orders
processed |
$200 |
Indirect
Production |
3,000,000 |
20,000 machine
hours |
$150 |
Traditional
cost estimate to produce Part A
Direct Material |
300,000 |
Direct Labor |
192,000 |
Overhead 400%* (192,000) |
768,000 |
(Here based on
direct labor cost) |
1,260,000 |
Estimated
total overhead cost = 6,600,000
Estimated
total direct labor cost 1,650,000 = 400%*
Total Cost 1,260,000
No of units 100,000 = $126/unit
cost
Overhead
cost Part A using ABC Method
Activity in Dept A |
Utilized |
Unit Cost |
Total Cost |
|
|
|
|
Pieces scrapped |
1000 |
$ 160 |
16,000 |
Set ups |
12 |
$2,400 |
28,800 |
Orders shipped |
500 |
10 |
5,000 |
Orders
processed |
100 |
$ 200 |
20,000 |
Machine hours |
500 |
$ 150 |
75,000 |
|
|
|
$144,800 |
Total
estimated of Part A cost using ABC Method
Direct Material |
300,000 |
Direct labor |
192,000 |
Overhead |
144,800 |
|
$636,800 |
|
|
636,800 = $63.68unit cost
100,000